Skip to main content
Log in

Physicians' Attitudes and the Use of Oral Anticoagulants: Surveying the Present and Envisioning Future

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation has the highest prevalence in the elderly. While the elderly are at the highest risk for stroke and would benefit the most from anticoagulation, they are also the least likely to receive anticoagulation. In a pooled analysis of the primary prevention trials, warfarin reduced stroke by 68% compared with placebo, and aspirin reduced stroke by 18%. Age, history of hypertension, diabetes, heart failure or reduced left ventricular function, and previous transient ischemic events and stroke are independent risk factors for stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Less than 50% of the elderly who have clear-cut indications and no contraindications for warfarin receive anticoagulant therapy. This low use of warfarin is driven by many factors, but physicians' fear of hemorrhage is among the most important. Better adherence to evidence-driven guidelines, better patient and physician education, point-of-care monitoring of INR and the future development of user friendly anticoagulant drugs are likely to result in higher rates of anticoagulation use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: The Framingham Study.Stroke 1991;22:983-988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Krahn AD, Manfreda J, Tate RB, Mathewson FA, Cuddy TE. The natural history of atrial fibrillation: Incidence, risk factors, and prognosis in the Manitoba Follow-Up Study. Am J Med 1995;98:476-484.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feinberg WM, Blackshear JL, Laupacis A, Kronmal R, Hart RG. Prevalence, age distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation. Analysis and implications.Arch Intern Med 1995;155(5):469-473.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: National implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: The Anticoagulation and Risk Factors In Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA 2001;285:2370-2375.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frost L, Engholm G, Johnsen S, Moller H, Husted S. Incident stroke after discharge from the hospital with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. Am J Med 2000;108:36-40.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Risk factors for stroke and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: Analysis of pooled data from five randomized controlled trials.Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1449-1457.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kopecky SL. Management decisions in lone atrial fibrillation.Hosp Pract 1992;27:135-150.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gajewski J, Singer RB. Mortality in an insured population with atrial fibrillation. JAMA 1981;245:1540-1544.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Laupacis A, Albers G, Dalen J, et al. Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Chest 1995;108(suppl4):352S-359S.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Boston Area Anticoagulation Trial for Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. The effect of low-dose warfarin on the risk of stroke in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation.N Engl J Med 1990;323(29):1505-1511.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Petersen P, Boysen G, Godtfredsen J, Andersen ED, Andersen B. Placebo-controlled, randomized trial of warfarin and aspirin for prevention of thromboembolic complications in chronic atrial fibrillation: The Copenhagen AFASAK study. Lancet 1989;1:175-179.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators.Design of a multicenter randomized trial for the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation study. Stroke 1990;21: 538-545.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Connolly SJ, Laupacis A, Gent M, et al. Canadian Atrial Fibrillation Anticoagulation (CAFA) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;18:349-355.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ezekowitz MD, Bridgers SL, James KE, et al. Warfarin in the prevention of stroke associated with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation: The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study.N Engl J Med 1992;327:1406-1412.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators.Adjusted-dose warfarin versus low intensity, fixed dose, warfarin plus aspirin for high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation III randomized clinical trials. Lancet 1996;348:633-638.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hart RG, Benavente O, McBride R, Pearce LA. Antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:492-501.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van Walraven C, Hart RG, Singer DE, et al. Oral anticoagulants vs aspirin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: An individual patient meta-analysis. JAMA 2002;288:2441- 2448.

    Google Scholar 

  18. European Atrial Fibrillation Trial Study Group. Secondary prevention in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation after transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. Lancet 1993;342:1255-1262.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hyleck EM, Skates SJ, Sheehan MA, et al. An analysis of the lowest dose of prophylactic anticoagulation for patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 1996;335:540-546.

    Google Scholar 

  20. European Atrial Fibrillation Trial Study Group. Secondary prevention in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation after transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. Lancet 1993;342:1255-1262.

    Google Scholar 

  21. He J, Whelton PK, Vu B, Klag MJ. Aspirin and risk of hemorrhagic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 1998;280:1930-1935.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Investigators. Risk factors for stroke and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Arch Internal Medicine 1994:154.

  23. Stafford R, Singer D. National patterns of warfarin use in atrial fibrillation. Arch Internal Medicine 1996;156:2537-2541.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bungard T, Ghali W, Teo K, et al. Why do patients with atrial fibrillation not receive warfarin? Arch Internal Medicine 2000;160:41-46.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hamby L, Weeks WB, Malikowski C. Complications of warfarin therapy: Causes, costs, and the role of the anticoagulation clinic. Effective Clinical Practice 2000;3:179-184.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hixson-Wallace JA, Dotson JB, Blakey SA. Effect of regimen complexity on patient satisfaction and compliance with warfarin therapy. Clinical Applied Thrombosis/ Hemostasis 2001;7:33-37.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lip GY, Kamath S, Jafri M, Mohammed A, Bareford D.Ethnic differences in patient perceptions of atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation therapy: The West Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Project. Stroke 2002;33:238-242.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Monette J, Gurwitz J, Rochon P, et al. Physician attitudes concerning warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Results of a survey of long term care practitioners.J AmGeriatr Soc 1997;45:1060-1065.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gross CP, Vogel EW, Dhondi AJ, et al. Factors influencing physicians' reported use of anticoagulation therapy in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A cross-sectional survey. Clinical Therapeutics 2003;25:1750-1764.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chang H, Bell J, Devoo D, Kirk J, Wasson J. Physician variation in anticoagulating patients with atrial fibrillation.Arch Intern Med 1990;150:81-84.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lee T, Pearson S, Johnson P, Garcia T, Weisberg M, Guadagnoli E. Failure of information as an intervention to modify clinical management. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:434-437.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Halperin JL. A long-term randomized trial comparing ximelagatran with warfarin for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. 2003 March. www.acc03online.acc.org/ ondemand/trials3.

  33. Blackshear JL, Odell JA. Appendage obliteration to reduce stroke in cardiac surgical patients with atrial fibrillation.Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:755-759.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Johnson WD, Ganjoo AK, Stone CD, et al. The left atrial appendage: Our most lethal human attachment! Surgical implications.European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2000;17:718-722.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Odell JA, Blackshear JL, Davies E, et al. Thoracoscopic obliteration of the left atrial appendage: Potential for stroke reduction? Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:565-567.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sieverti H, Lesh M, Trepels T, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion to prevent stroke in high risk patients with atrial fibrillation: Early clinical experience. Circulation 2002;105:1887-1889.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nakai T, Lesh M, Gerstenfeld E, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion for preventing cardioembolism: First experience in canine model. Circulation 2002;105:2217-2222.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Harris D, Leor J, Assaf Y, et al. Convergence and stabilization of cellular proliferation into cellular steady state over the permanent arterial filtration struts of the Diverter: A novel fpercutaneous device for protection against embolic stroke. J AmColl Cardiol 2003;41:300A-301A.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

York, M., Agarwal, A. & Ezekowitz, M. Physicians' Attitudes and the Use of Oral Anticoagulants: Surveying the Present and Envisioning Future. J Thromb Thrombolysis 16, 33–37 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:THRO.0000014590.83591.4c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:THRO.0000014590.83591.4c

Navigation