Skip to main content
Log in

Pre-Hospital Fibrinolysis Followed by Angioplasty or Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Long-Term Clinical Outcome

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Randomized trials comparing primary angioplasty and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have shown an advantage for primary angioplasty. The long-term follow-up of pre-hospital fibrinolysis followed by elective or rescue coronary angioplasty versus primary angioplasty is not well established after acute myocardial infarction. This study sought to assess the long-term clinical outcome of patients with AMI having either received pre-hospital fibrinolysis optimized by coronary angioplasty or primary angioplasty.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis involving 318 patients who either underwent primary angioplasty (n = 157) or received pre-hospital fibrinolysis followed by an angioplasty (rescue or elective) (n = 161) within 6 hours of the onset of chest pain.

Results: The groups were similar regarding their baseline characteristics except for the ages. No difference was noted for in-hospital mortality (primary PTCA group: 2.48%, combined group: 2.54%; p = ns) with no increased risk of hemorrhage. The 3-year mortality was not significantly different in the two groups (9.7% vs. 4.9%; p = 0.15). Regarding major adverse cardiac events (29.5% vs. 37.5%; p = 0.23), reintervention (22.5% vs. 23.2%; p = 0.99) or target lesion revascularization (16.1% vs. 14.7%; p = 0.68), the groups were statistically similar.

Conclusion: These data from real-life practice emphasize the safety and similar benefits on the long-term clinical outcome of AMI patients having undergone either pre-hospital fibrinolysis followed by angioplasty or primary angioplasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rentrop KP, Blanke H, Karsch KR, et al. Acute myocardial infarction: Intracoronary application of nitroglycerin and streptokinase. Clin Cardiol 1979;2(5):354-363.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Simoons ML, Serruys PW, van den Brand M, et al. Early thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: Limitation of infarct size and improved survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:717-728.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, et al. A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. For the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group.N Engl J Med 1993;328:673-679.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zijlstra F, De Boer MJ, Hoorntje JC, Reiffers S, Reiber JHC, Suryapranata H. A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med 1993;328:680-684.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weaver WD, Simes RJ, Betriu A, et al. Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: A quantitative review.JAMA 1997;278:2093-2098.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Every NR, Parsons LS, Hlatky M, Martin JS, Weaver WD. A comparison of thrombolytic therapy with primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention investigators (MITI).N Engl J Med 1996;335:1253-1260.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tiefenbrunn AJ, Chandra NC, French WJ, Gore JM, Rogers WJ. Clinical experience with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with alteplase (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator) in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A report from the Second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI-2). J AmColl Cardiol 1998;31(6):1240-1245.

    Google Scholar 

  8. The Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO IIb) Angioplasty Substudy Investigators. A clinical trial comparing primary coronary angioplasty with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med 1997;336(23):1621-1628.

  9. Zijlstra F, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, et al. Long-term bene-fit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med 1999;341:1413-1419.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gilon D, Leitersdorf I, Gotsman MS, Zahger D, Sapoznikov D, Weiss AT. Reduction of congestive heart failure symptoms by very early fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: A long-term follow-up.Am Heart J 2000;139:1096-1100.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boersma E, Mass AC, Deckers JW, Simoons ML. Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: Reappraisal of the golden hour.Lancet 1996;348:771-775.

    Google Scholar 

  12. GREAT Group. Feasibility, safety and efficacy of domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners. Grampian Region Early Anistreplase Trial.BMJ 1992;305:548-553.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rawles JM. Quantification of the benefit of earlier thrombolytic therapy: Five years of results of the Grampian Region Early Anistreplase Trial (GREAT).J AmColl Cardiol 1997;30:1181-1186.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Juliard JM, Himbert D, Cristofini P, et al. A matched comparison of the combination of pre-hospital thrombolysis and stand by rescue angioplasty with primary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:305-310.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bonnefoy E, Lapostolle F, Leizorovicz A, et al. On behalf of the Comparison of Angioplasty and Pre-hospital Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAPTIM) study group. Primary angioplasty versus pre-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: A randomised study.Lancet 2002;360:825-829.

    Google Scholar 

  16. The GUSTO investigators. An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med 1993;329(10):673-682.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Waldecker B, Waas W, Haberbosch W, Voss R, Heizmann H, Tillmanns H. Longterm follow-up after direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.J AmColl Cardiol 1998;32:1320-1325.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Arani DT, Ryan TJ, Walford G, McCallister BD. Short-and long-term mortality for patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.J AmColl Cardiol 2000;36(4):1194-1201.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weaver WD, Cerqueira M, Hallstrom AP, et al. Pre-hospital initiated versus hospital initiated thrombolytic therapy.For the myocardial infarction triage and intervention project group (MITI).JAMA 1993;270:1211-1216.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Loubeyre C, Lefevre T, Louvard Y, et al. Outcome after combined reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction, combining pre-hospital thrombolysis with immediate percutaneous coronary intervention and stent.Eur Heart J 2001;22(13):1128-1135.

    Google Scholar 

  21. McFadden EP. Fibrinolysis and stenting in acute myocardial infarction: Newlyweds destined for a 'menage a trois'? Eur Heart J 2001;22(13):1067-1069.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nunn CM, O'Neill WW, Rothbaum D, et al. Long-term outcome after primary angioplasty: Report from the primary angioplasty in, myocardial infarction (PAMI-1) Trial.JAm Coll Cardiol 1999;33:640-646.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Williams DO, Ruocco NA, Forman S, and the TIMI Investigators. Coronary angioplasty after recombinant tissuetype plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: A report from the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial.J AmColl Cardiol 1987;10:45B-50B.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Topol EJ, Eha JE, Brin KP, et al.Applicability of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty to patients with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator mediated thrombolysis.Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1985;11:337-348.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Topol EJ, Califf RM, George BS, et al. A randomized trial of immediate versus delayed elective angioplasty after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction (TAMI-1).N Engl J Med 1987;317:581-588.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Simoons ML, Arnold AE, Betriu A, et al. Thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: No additional benefit from immediate percutaneous coronary angioplasty. ECSG.Lancet 1988;1:197-203.

    Google Scholar 

  27. The TIMI Study Group. Comparison of invasive and conservative strategies after treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction.Results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) phase II trial.N Engl J Med 1989;320:618-628.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vermeer F, Oude Ophuis AJ, vd Berg EJ, et al. Prospective randomised comparison between thrombolysis, rescue PTCA, and primary PTCA in patients with extensive myocardial infarction admitted to a hospital without PTCA facilities: A safety and feasibility study.Heart 1999;82:426-431.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ross AM, Coyne KS, Reiner JS, et al. A randomized trial comparing primary angioplasty with a strategy of shortacting thrombolysis and immediate planned rescue angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: The PACT trial.PACT investigators. Plasminogen-activator Angioplasty Compatibility Trial.J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1954- 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  30. De Lemos JA, Antman EM, Giugliano RP, et al. For the TIMI 14 investigators. ST-Segment resolution and infarctrelated artery patency and flow after thrombolytic therapy.Am J Cardiol 2000;85:299-304.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zijlstra F. Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty compared to thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (editorial).Eur Heart J 2000;21:1478-1488.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roncalli, J., Brunelle, F., Galinier, M. et al. Pre-Hospital Fibrinolysis Followed by Angioplasty or Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Long-Term Clinical Outcome. J Thromb Thrombolysis 15, 181–188 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:THRO.0000011373.44451.8b

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:THRO.0000011373.44451.8b

Navigation