Abstract
Teaching quality emerged as asignificant issue in higher education duringthe 90s. This led to the implementation ofnumerous quality control, assurance andenhancement schemes as institutions attemptedto stay abreast of demands from variousstakeholders in a rapidly changing educationalenvironment. More recently, with theestablishment of the Australian UniversityQuality Agency (AUQA) in 2000, there is nowfurther impetus to review quality schemes inAustralian universities. This paper describeshow a teaching award programme may impact onplanning and review processes within universitydepartments and highlights how the alignment ofteaching award criteria with external qualityaudit requirements can lead tocross-institutional benefits for enhancing thequality of teaching.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anderson, E. (1993). Campus Use of the Teaching Portfolio: Twenty-five Profiles. Washington DC: American Association for Higher Education.
Ashcroft, K. (1995). The Lecturer's Guide to Quality and Standards in Colleges and Universities. London: Falmer Press.
Baker, R.G. (1993). Valuing University Teaching and Learning: Academic Staff Perceptions: A Report Prepared for the University Academic Board Teaching Learning Advisory Committee. Faculty of Education, Curtin University of Technology.
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Suffolk: St Edmundsbury Press.
Boileau, D.M. (1993). Scholarship Reconsidered: A Challenge to Use Teaching Portfolios to Document the Scholarship of Teaching. Paper presented at the The Changing Role of the American Professoriate, New Haven Connecticut.
Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Braskamp, L.A. & Ory, J.C. (1994). Assessing Faculty Work: Enhancing Individual and Institutional Performance. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.
Brennan, J. & Shah, T. (2000). Managing Quality in Higher Education: An International Perspective on Institutional Assessment and Change. Buckingham: Open University.
Carroll, M. Does Auditing HE Against Standards Encourage Masterpieces or Paint-by-Numbers? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 28(3), 297-307.
Cashin, W.E. (1990). Assessing Teacher Effectiveness. In P. Seldin and Associates (eds), How Administrators Can Improve Teaching: Moving from Talk to Action in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 89-103.
Coaldrake, P. & Stedman, L. (1999). Academic Work in the Twenty-first Century: Changing roles and policies. Canberra ACT: Higher Education Division. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
Dotolo, L.G. (1999). Faculty Development: Working Together to Improve Teaching and learning, New Directions for Higher Education 27(2), 51-57.
Dunstan, R. et al. (2001). The Teaching Excellence Award: Was it Worth the Effort? In A. Herrmann & M.M. Kulski (eds), Expanding Horizons in Teaching and Learning. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 7-9 February. Perth: Curtin University of Technology. http://cea.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2001/dunstan.htmlb.
Edgerton, R. et al. (1991). The Teaching Portfolio: Capturing the Scholarship in Teaching. Washington DC: American Association for Higher Education.
Elton, L. (1992). Quality Enhancement and Academic Professionalism. The New Academic 1, 3-5.
Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (1992). Challenging Conceptions of Teaching: Some Prompts for Good Practice. HERDSA.
Kember, D. (2000). Action Learning and Action Research. London: Kogan Page.
Kulski, M.M. & Groombridge, B. (2001). Valuing University Teaching: Matching Rhetoric with Corporate Action. In M. Kulski & A. Herrmann (eds), New Horizons in University Teaching and Learning: Responding to Change. Perth, Western Australia: Centre for Educational Advancement, 83-96.
Lally, M. & Myhill, M. (1994). Teaching Quality: The Development of Valid Instruments of Assessment. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education and Training, AGPS.
Loder, C. et al. (1989). Teaching Quality in Higher Education: A Review of Research and Literature. Institute of Education University of London: Polytechnic and Colleges Funding Council Committee of Enquiry into Teaching Quality.
McKinnon, K.R. et al. (2000). Benchmarking: A Manual for Australian Universities. Caberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Higher Education Division.
Mullins, G.P. & Cannon, R.A. (1992). Judging the Quality of Teaching. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education and Training: AGPS.
Neumann, R. (1994). Valuing Quality Teaching Through Recognition of Context Specific Skills. The Australian Universities' Review 37(1), 8-13.
Nightingale, P. & O'Neil, M. (1994). Achieving Quality Learning in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page.
Ramsden, P. (1998). Learning to Lead in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
Ramsden, P. et al. (1995). Recognising and Rewarding Good Teaching in Australian Higher Education (Final report). Australian Government Publishing Office Canberra: Project commissioned by the Committee for the Advancement of University Teaching.
Ramsden, P. & Martin, E. (1996). Recognition of Good University Teaching: Policies from an Australian Study. Studies in Higher Education 21(3), 299-315.
develop/EIT/itp.html#acp}.
Shulman, L.S. (1987). Assessment for Teaching: an Initiative for the Profession. Phi Delta Kappan 69(1), 38-44.
Woodhouse, D. (July, 2001). Australian Universities Quality Agency: Audit Manual. Draft Edition. Melbourne: AUQA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kulski, M., Groombridge, B. Aligning Teaching Quality Indicators with University Reward Mechanisms. Tertiary Education and Management 10, 45–59 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TEAM.0000012236.63005.a2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TEAM.0000012236.63005.a2