Skip to main content
Log in

Aligning Teaching Quality Indicators with University Reward Mechanisms

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teaching quality emerged as asignificant issue in higher education duringthe 90s. This led to the implementation ofnumerous quality control, assurance andenhancement schemes as institutions attemptedto stay abreast of demands from variousstakeholders in a rapidly changing educationalenvironment. More recently, with theestablishment of the Australian UniversityQuality Agency (AUQA) in 2000, there is nowfurther impetus to review quality schemes inAustralian universities. This paper describeshow a teaching award programme may impact onplanning and review processes within universitydepartments and highlights how the alignment ofteaching award criteria with external qualityaudit requirements can lead tocross-institutional benefits for enhancing thequality of teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, E. (1993). Campus Use of the Teaching Portfolio: Twenty-five Profiles. Washington DC: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashcroft, K. (1995). The Lecturer's Guide to Quality and Standards in Colleges and Universities. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R.G. (1993). Valuing University Teaching and Learning: Academic Staff Perceptions: A Report Prepared for the University Academic Board Teaching Learning Advisory Committee. Faculty of Education, Curtin University of Technology.

  • Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Suffolk: St Edmundsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boileau, D.M. (1993). Scholarship Reconsidered: A Challenge to Use Teaching Portfolios to Document the Scholarship of Teaching. Paper presented at the The Changing Role of the American Professoriate, New Haven Connecticut.

  • Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braskamp, L.A. & Ory, J.C. (1994). Assessing Faculty Work: Enhancing Individual and Institutional Performance. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J. & Shah, T. (2000). Managing Quality in Higher Education: An International Perspective on Institutional Assessment and Change. Buckingham: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, M. Does Auditing HE Against Standards Encourage Masterpieces or Paint-by-Numbers? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 28(3), 297-307.

  • Cashin, W.E. (1990). Assessing Teacher Effectiveness. In P. Seldin and Associates (eds), How Administrators Can Improve Teaching: Moving from Talk to Action in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 89-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coaldrake, P. & Stedman, L. (1999). Academic Work in the Twenty-first Century: Changing roles and policies. Canberra ACT: Higher Education Division. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotolo, L.G. (1999). Faculty Development: Working Together to Improve Teaching and learning, New Directions for Higher Education 27(2), 51-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunstan, R. et al. (2001). The Teaching Excellence Award: Was it Worth the Effort? In A. Herrmann & M.M. Kulski (eds), Expanding Horizons in Teaching and Learning. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 7-9 February. Perth: Curtin University of Technology. http://cea.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2001/dunstan.htmlb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, R. et al. (1991). The Teaching Portfolio: Capturing the Scholarship in Teaching. Washington DC: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, L. (1992). Quality Enhancement and Academic Professionalism. The New Academic 1, 3-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (1992). Challenging Conceptions of Teaching: Some Prompts for Good Practice. HERDSA.

  • Kember, D. (2000). Action Learning and Action Research. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulski, M.M. & Groombridge, B. (2001). Valuing University Teaching: Matching Rhetoric with Corporate Action. In M. Kulski & A. Herrmann (eds), New Horizons in University Teaching and Learning: Responding to Change. Perth, Western Australia: Centre for Educational Advancement, 83-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lally, M. & Myhill, M. (1994). Teaching Quality: The Development of Valid Instruments of Assessment. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education and Training, AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loder, C. et al. (1989). Teaching Quality in Higher Education: A Review of Research and Literature. Institute of Education University of London: Polytechnic and Colleges Funding Council Committee of Enquiry into Teaching Quality.

  • McKinnon, K.R. et al. (2000). Benchmarking: A Manual for Australian Universities. Caberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Higher Education Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, G.P. & Cannon, R.A. (1992). Judging the Quality of Teaching. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education and Training: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R. (1994). Valuing Quality Teaching Through Recognition of Context Specific Skills. The Australian Universities' Review 37(1), 8-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale, P. & O'Neil, M. (1994). Achieving Quality Learning in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1998). Learning to Lead in Higher Education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. et al. (1995). Recognising and Rewarding Good Teaching in Australian Higher Education (Final report). Australian Government Publishing Office Canberra: Project commissioned by the Committee for the Advancement of University Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. & Martin, E. (1996). Recognition of Good University Teaching: Policies from an Australian Study. Studies in Higher Education 21(3), 299-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • develop/EIT/itp.html#acp}.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L.S. (1987). Assessment for Teaching: an Initiative for the Profession. Phi Delta Kappan 69(1), 38-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, D. (July, 2001). Australian Universities Quality Agency: Audit Manual. Draft Edition. Melbourne: AUQA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kulski, M., Groombridge, B. Aligning Teaching Quality Indicators with University Reward Mechanisms. Tertiary Education and Management 10, 45–59 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TEAM.0000012236.63005.a2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TEAM.0000012236.63005.a2

Keywords

Navigation