Skip to main content
Log in

A Puzzle Concerning Time Perception

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to a plausible and influential account of perceptual knowledge, the truth-makers of beliefs that constitute perceptual knowledge must feature in the causal explanation of how we acquire those beliefs. However, this account runs into difficulties when it tries to accommodate time perception – specifically perception of order and duration – since the features we are apparently tracking in such perception are (it is argued) not causal. The central aim of the paper is to solve this epistemological puzzle. Two strategies are examined. The first strategy locates the causal truth-makers within the psychological mechanism underlying time perception, thus treating facts about time order and duration as mind-dependent. This strategy, however, is problematic. The second strategy modifies the causal account of perceptual knowledge to include a non-causal component in the explanation of belief-acquisition, namely chronometric explanation. Applying this much more satisfactory approach to perceptual knowledge of time, we can preserve the mind-independence of order and duration, but not that of time's flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Augustine, St.: 397, Confessions, trans. R. S. Pinecoffin, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, A. J.: 1940, The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binkofski, F. and R. A. Block: 1996, 'Accelerated Time after Left Frontal Cortex Lesion', Neurocase 2, 485–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, Richard and Dan Zakay: 2001, 'Retrospective and Prospective Timing: Memory, Attention, and Consciousness', in Hoerl and McCormack, pp. 59–76

  • Church, R. M. and H. Broadbent: 1990, 'Alternative Representations of Time, Number, and Rate', Cognition 37, 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald: 1967, 'Causal Relations', in Essays on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel: 1991, Consciousness Explained, Allen Lane, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, William J.: 1990, About Time: Inventing the Fourth Dimension, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbon, J., R. M. Church, and W. Meck: 1984, 'Scalar Timing in Memory', in J. Gibbon and L.Allan (eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 432: Timing and Time Perception, New York Academy of Sciences, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Alvin: 1967, 'A Causal Theory of Knowing', Journal of Philosophy 64, 357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Alvin: 1976, 'Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge', Journal of Philosophy 73, 771–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P.: 1961, 'The Causal Theory of Perception', Aristotelian Society Supplementary 35, 121–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Bob: 1987, Abstract Objects, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, I. J. and J. E. Sherrick: 1961) 'Perceived Order in Different Sense Modalities', Journal of Experimental Psychology 62, 423–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, Christoph and Teresa McCormack (eds.): 2001, Time and Memory: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Frank: 1977, Perception, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, William: 1890, The Principles of Psychology, Henry Holt, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Le Poidevin, Robin: 1992, 'On the Acausality of Time, Space, and Space-Time', Analysis 52, 146–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Poidevin, Robin: 1999, 'Can Beliefs Be Caused By Their Truth-Makers?', Analysis 59, 148–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Poidevin, Robin: 2003, Travels in Four Dimensions: The Enigmas of Space and Time, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libet, Benjamin: 1981, 'The Experimental Evidence for Subjective Referral of a Sensory Experience Backwards in Time: Reply to P. S. Churchland', Philosophy of Science 48, 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L.: 1977, Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh, N. J.: 1983, Conditioning and Associative Learning, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, J. E.: 1908, 'The Unreality of Time', Mind 17, 457–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, J. E.: 1927, The Nature of Existence, Vol. II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Part of Chapter 33 reprinted under the title 'The Unreality of Time', in Robin Le Poidevin and Murray MacBeath (eds.), The Philosophy of Time, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993, pp. 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, D. H.: 1995, The Facts of Causation, Routledge, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, D. H.: 1998, Real Time II, Routledge, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moore: 2001, 'Apperception and the Unreality of Tense', in Hoerl and McCormack, pp. 375–391.

  • Newton-Smith, W. H.: 1980, The Structure of Time, Routledge, London.

  • Nerlich, Graham: 1994, What Spacetime Explains, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, Robert: 1972, The Psychology of Consciousness, Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, Christopher: 1979, Holistic Explanation: Action, Space, Interpretation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöppel, Ernst: 1978, 'Time Perception', in Richard Held et al. (eds.), Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. VIII: Perception, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 713–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, Hans: 1958, The Philosophy of Space and Time, Dover, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand: 1912, The Problems of Philosophy, OPUS edn., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1959.

  • Strawson, P. F.: 1974, 'Causation in Perception', in Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, Marshall: 1979, Reasons and Knowledge, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooley, Michael: 1997, Time, Tense, and Causation, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, Michel: 1999, 'The Perception of Time: Philosophical Views and Psychological Evidence', in Jeremy Butterfield (ed.), The Arguments of Time, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 217–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wearden, J. H.: 2001, 'Internal Clocks and the Representation of Time', in Hoerl and McCormack, pp. 37–58.

  • Woodrow, H.: 1951, 'Time Perception', in S. S. Stevens (ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 1224–1236.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poidevin, R.L. A Puzzle Concerning Time Perception. Synthese 142, 109–142 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000047710.71824.b1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000047710.71824.b1

Keywords

Navigation