Abstract
A briefing workshop was run in an effort to involve its participants in choosing a strategic direction, and eventual form, for a proposed facility. The workshop was an action research, participative process that sought to improve final design by preconsultation with some relevant stakeholders. This paper will specifically focus on our attempt to use strategic planning software at an early stage of such a workshop. It discusses and illustrates the difficulties of importing a new technique into an established, professional setting where activities and roles may be expressed, or assumed, on the basis of previous experience. More exactly, although we hoped to use our software to analyze and explore participants' design styles, and so predict their likely choice of design option, the architects present undermined such analyzes by playing a role rather than telling the software what they really thought about the various strategic choices. Hence it was, in some ways, a waste of time using our software. We speculate below whether such undermining might be symptomatic of deep philosophical differences between the workshop organizers, planners, and architects. We also examine whether such differences bode ill for the future of architecture.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beed, C., and Kane, O. (1991). What is the critique of the mathematization of economics? Kylos 44(4), 581-682.
Burle de Figueiredo, J., and Kaya, K. (1972). Effort satisfaction analysis. Futures 4(4), 314-324.
Cherniak, C. (1986). Minimal Rationality, Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.
Eden, C. (1989). Using cognitive mapping for strategic options development and analysis (SODA). In Rosenhead, J. (ed.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World, Wiley, London, pp. 21-42.
Mintzberg, H. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, Prentice-Hall, London.
Nuttin, J. (1984). Motivation, Planning and Action, Hillsdale, NJ: Leuven University Press/Erlbaum.
Oppenshaw, S. (1997). Artificial Intelligence in Geography, Wiley, London.
Rosenhead, J. (1989). Introduction: Old and new paradigms of analysis. In Rosenhead, J. (ed.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World, Wiley, London, pp. 1-20.
Smith, J., Kenley, R., and Wyatt, R. (1998). The client briefing problem: An exploratory study. Eng. Construct. Architect. Manage. 5(4), 378-386.
Smith, J., and Wyatt, R. (1998). Criteria for strategic decision-making at the pre-briefing stage. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Association of Researchers in Construction Management, September 9–11 1998, ARCOM, University of Reading, UK, Vol. 1, pp. 300-309.
Von Winterfedt, D., and Edwards, W. (1986). Decision Analysis and Behavioural Research, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.
Wyatt, R. (1997). Consistency of planning style. In Sikdar, P. K., Dhingra, S. L., and Krishna Rao, K. V. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Narosa Publishing, Mumbai, Vol. 1, pp. 181-192.
Wyatt, R. (1999). Computer Aided Policy Making: Lessons From Strategic Planning Software, E and F N Spon, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wyatt, R., Smith, J. & Love, P.E.D. Philosophical Differences: The Case of Architects' Reluctance to Use Strategic Planning Software. Systemic Practice and Action Research 17, 127–142 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPAA.0000018907.88310.c3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPAA.0000018907.88310.c3