Studies in East European Thought

, Volume 56, Issue 2–3, pp 143–160 | Cite as

Minding the Gap: Detachment and Understanding in Aleksej Losev's Dialektika mifa

  • Robert Bird
Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Aleksej Losev's definition of myth centres onthe concept of detachment. In modern timesdetachment has most often figured in thecontext of philosophical aesthetics, where itis a cognitive category akin to Kant's``disinterestedness'' or the Russian formalists'``estrangement.'' However Losev's usage alsomakes reference to the ontological sense ofdetachment as contemplativeascent (cf. Meister Eckhardt'sAbgeschiedenheit). Thus, Losev's concept ofmyth combines both senses of detachment,binding perceptual attitude and being togetherin a double movement of resignation from theworld and union with meaning; this movementliterally makes sense out of reality. Ittherefore bears comparison to the treatment ofdistanciation in contemporary hermeneutics,where detachment is a key condition ofunderstanding. By investigating Losev'sconnections to other Russian thinkers, theauthor makes a case for a distinct Russiantradition of hermeneutic philosophy (V. Ivanov,G. Shpet, A. Bakshy, A. Losev).

aesthetics aesthetic distance Alexander Bakshy detachment distanciation Gustav Shpet hermeneutics Vjacheslav Ivanov 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Adorno, Theodor W. Ästhetische Theorie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1970.Google Scholar
  2. Bakshy, Alexander. The Path of the Modern Russian Stage and Other Essays, John W. Luce & Company, Boston, 1918.Google Scholar
  3. Cassirer, Ernst. Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen. Zweiter Teil: Das Mythische Denken, Bruno Cassirer, Oxford, 1954.Google Scholar
  4. Dilthey, Wilhelm. Selected Works. Volume V. Poetry and Experience, Rudolf A. Makkreel and Frithjof Rodi (eds.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1985.Google Scholar
  5. Giesz, Ludwig. Die Phänomenologie des Kitsches, 2nd edn., Fink, Munich, 1971.Google Scholar
  6. Guyer, Paul. “Disinterestedness and Desire in Kant's Aesthetics,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36(4) (1978), pp. 449-460.Google Scholar
  7. Harries, Karsten. The Meaning of Modern Art, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, 1968.Google Scholar
  8. Hegel, G.W.F. Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, T.M. Knox (trans.), Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975.Google Scholar
  9. Ivanov, Vjacheslav. Sobranie sochinenij, 4 vols, Foyer oriental chrétien, Brussels, 1971–1986.Google Scholar
  10. Ivanov, Viacheslav. Selected Essays, Robert Bird (trans.), Michael Wachtel (ed.), Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, 2001.Google Scholar
  11. Jauss, Hans Robert. Aesthetic Experience and Literary Hermeneutics, Michael Shaw (trans.), Introduction by Wlad Godzich, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1982.Google Scholar
  12. John Climacus. The Ladder of Divine Ascent, Colm Luibheid and Norman Russell (trans.), Introduction by Kallistos Ware, Preface by Colm Luibheid, Paulist Press, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
  13. Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Judgement, James Creed Meredith (trans.), Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1952.Google Scholar
  14. Losev, A.F. Bytie. Imja. Kosmos, Mysl', Rossijskij otkrytyj universitet, Moscow, 1993.Google Scholar
  15. Losev, Aleksej Fedorovich. Dialektika mifa: Dopolnenie k “Dialektike mifa”, Mysl', Moscow, 2001.Google Scholar
  16. Meister Eckhardt. Meister Eckhart. A Modern Translation, Raymond Bernard Blakney (trans.), Harper & Brothers, New York, 1941.Google Scholar
  17. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Sense and Non-Sense, Hubert L. Dreyfus and Patricia Allen Dreyfus (trans.), Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, 1964.Google Scholar
  18. Merleu-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception, Colin Smith (trans.), Routledge, London/New York, 2002.Google Scholar
  19. Odin, Steve. Artistic Detachment in Japan and the West: Psychic Distance in Comparative Aesthetics, University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, 2001.Google Scholar
  20. Ricoeur, Paul. “The Hermeneutical Function of Distanciation,” From Text to Action. Essays on Hermeneutics, II, Kathleen Blamey and John B. Thompson (trans.), Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, 1991, pp. 75-88.Google Scholar
  21. Shklovskij, Viktor. O teorii prozy, Sovetskij pisatel', Moscow, 1983.Google Scholar
  22. Shpet, G.G. “Germenevtika i ee problemy,” in E.V. Pasternak (ed.), Kontekst-1991. Literaturno-teoreticheskie issledovaniia, Nauka, Moscow, 1993, pp. 215-255.Google Scholar
  23. Shpet, G.G. “Germenevtika i ee problemy,” in E.V. Pasternak (ed.), Kontekst-1992. Literaturno-teoreticheskie issledovaniia, Nauka, Moscow, 1993.Google Scholar
  24. Shpet, G.G. Psikhologiia sotsial'nogo bytiia, Voronezh, Moscow, 1996.Google Scholar
  25. Shpet, G.G. Istoriia kak predmet logiki, Moscow, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Bird
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Slavic Languages and LiteraturesThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations