Abstract
Within the past decade, restorative justice has emerged as a truly global phenomenon. Although retributive justice has dominated the penal landscape, more recently, restorative principles at sentencing have attracted increased attention. Restorative sentencing emphasizes the importance of compensation and reconciliation between victims and offenders and pays less attention to establishing proportionality between the seriousness of the offense and the severity of the sentence imposed. Although voluminous (and proliferating), the scholarly literature on restorative justice has to date neglected one critical issue: public opinion with respect to this justice paradigm. Public opinion researchers too, have generally overlooked this topic. The goal of this paper is to determine which elements of the new paradigm generate public approval, and which features are likely to encounter or provoke public opposition, drawing upon related international research published in English over the past 20 years (1982–2002). The review reveals widespread support for “restorative” sentencing options, such as community service, compensation, and restitution, particularly when applied to young offenders. However, it also seems clear that public support for these alternatives to punitive sentencing options declines as the seriousness of the offence increases, suggesting strong public adherence to the retributive principle of proportionality in sentencing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Angus Reid (1997). Attitudes to Crime, Angus Reid Group, Ottawa.
Applegate, B. (1997). Penal austerity: Perceived utility, desert, and public attitudes toward prison amenities. Am. J. Crim. Justice 25: 253–268.
Bae, I. (1992). A survey on public acceptance of restitution as an alternative to incarceration for property offenders in Hennepin County, U.S.A. In Messmer, H., and Otto, H.-U. (eds.), Restorative Justice on Trial: Pitfalls and Potentials of Victim–Offender Mediation—International Research Perspective. Kluwer Academic, Boston.
Belgrave, J. (1995). Public attitudes towards restorative justice, Chap. 4. In Restorative Justice: A Discussion Paper, Ministry of Justice, Wellington, NZ.
Bilz, K. (2002). Restorative Justice and Victim Offender Mediation (VOM): A New Area for Social Psychological Inquiry, Available at: www.princeton.edu/ ~kbliz/V
Boers, K., and Sessar, K. (1989). Do people really want punishment? On the relationship between acceptance of restitution, punishment, and fear of crime. In Sessar, K., and Kerner, H.-J. (eds.), Developments in Crime and Crime Control Research, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Bowers, W. J. (1993). Capital punishment and contemporary values: People's misgivings and the court's misperceptions. Law Soc. Rev. 27: 157–175.
Braithwaite, J. (1989) Crime, Shame and Reintegration, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, Australia.
Braithwaite, J. (1999). Restorative justice: Assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts. In Tonry, M. (ed.), Crime and Justice, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Carroll, J. S. (1978). Causal attributions in expert parole decisions. J. Pers. 36: 1501–1511.
Carroll, J. S., and Payne, J. W. (1977). Crime seriousness recidivism risk, and causal attributions in judgments of prison terms by students and experts. J. Appl. Psychol. 62: 595–602.
Chapman, B., Mirrlees-Black, C., and Brawn, C. (2002). Improving Public Attitudes to the Criminal Justice System: The Impact of Information, Home Office, London.
Cullen, F., Fisher, B., and Applegate, B. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. In Tonry, M. (ed.), Crime and Justice, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Daly, K.(2000). Revisiting the relationship between retributive and restorative justice. In Strang, H. and Braithwaite, J. (eds.), Restorative Justice: From Philosophy to Practice, Dartmouth, Aldershot, England UK.
Darby, B. W., and Schlenker, B. R. (1989). Children's reactions to transgressions: Effects of the actor's apology, reputation and remorse. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 28: 353–364.
Darley, J., Carlsmith, K., and Robinson, P. (2000). Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment. Law Hum. Behav. 24: 659–683.
Doble, J. (1994). Crime and Corrections: The Views of the People of Vermont, John Doble Research Associates, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Doble, J. (1998). Crime and Corrections: The Views of the People of New Hampshire, John Doble Research Associates, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Doble, J., and Greene, J. (2000). Attitudes Towards Crime and Punishment in Vermont: Public Opinion About an Experiment With Restorative Justice, John Doble Research Associates, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Doob, A. N. (2000). Transforming the punishment environment: Understanding public views of what should be accomplished at sentencing. Can. J. Criminol. 42: 323–340.
Doob. A. N., and Marinos, V. (1995). Reconceptualizing punishment: Understanding the limita-tions on the use of intermediate punishments. Univ. Chicago Law Sch. Roundtable 2: 413–433.
Doob, A. N., and Roberts, J. V. (1988) Public punitiveness and public knowledge of the facts: Some canadian surveys. In Walker, N., and Hough, M. (eds.), Public Attitudes to Sentencing, Cambridge Studies in Criminology, LIX, Gower, Aldershot, England, UK.
Doob, A. N., Sprott, J., Marinos, V., and Varma, K. (1998) An Exploration of Ontario Residents' Views of Crime and the Criminal Justice System, Center of Criminology, Toronto.
Finchman, F. D., and Jaspars, J. M. (1980). Attribution of responsibility: From man-the-scientist to man-as-lawyer. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York.
Finkel, N. J. (2000). But it's not fair: Commonsense notions of unfairness. Psychol. Public Policy Law 6: 898–952.
Flanagan, T. (1996). Community corrections in the public mind. Federal Probation 6: 3–9.
Galaway, B. (1984). A survey of public acceptance of restitution as an alternative to imprisonment for property offenders. Aust.N.Z.J.Criminol.17: 108–116.
Gandy, J. (1978). Attitudes toward the use of restitution. In Hudson, J., and Galaway, B. (eds.), Offender Restitution in Theory and Action, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
Gandy, J., and Galaway, B. (1980). Restitution as a sanction for offenders: A public's view. In Hudson, J., and Galaway, B. (eds.), Victims, Offenders, and Alternative Sanctions, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
Gebotys, R., and Roberts, J. (1987). Public views of sentencing: The role of offender characteristics.Can. J. Behav. Sci. 19: 479–488.
Gorczyk, J., and Perry, J. (1997). What the public wants. Market research finds support for restorative justice. Corrections Today 59: 78–83.
Harrel, W. A. (1981). The effects of alcohol use and offender remorsefulness on sentencing decisions.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 11: 83–91.
Hart, H. L. A., and Honore, A. M. (1959). Causation in the Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
Heider, E. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations,Wiley, New York.
Hommers, W. (1988). The effects of apology and third-party compensation on punishments imposed for two kinds of damages. Z. Sozialpsychol. 19: 139–151.
Hommers, W., and Endres, J. (1991). The effects of apology on interrelated judgments concerning restitution and punishment. Z. Exp. Andgewandte Psychol. 36: 433–452.
Hough, M., and Roberts, J. V. (1998). Attitudes to Punishment: Findings From the British Crime Survey, Home Office Research Study 179, Home Office, London.
Hough, M., and Roberts, J. V. (2004a). Youth Crime and Justice: An Analysis of Public Opinion in Great Britain, Kings College, Institute for Criminal Policy Research, London.
Hough, M., and Roberts, J. V. (2004b). Public Confidence in Criminal Justice: An International Review, King's College, Institute for Criminal Policy Research, London.
Hudson, J. (1992). A review of research dealing with views on financial restitution. In Messmer, H., and Otto, H. (eds), Restorative Justice on Trial: Pitfalls and Potentials of Victim-Offender Mediation—International Research Perspectives, Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA.
Justice 1 Committee (2002). Public Attitudes Towards Sentencing and Alternatives to Imprisonment, Available at: www.scottish.parliament.uk/official report/cttee/
Karp, D. R. (2001). Harm and repair: Observing restorative justice in Vermont. Justice Q. 18: 727–757.
Kleinke, C. L., Wallis, R., and Stalder, K. (1992). Evaluation of a rapist as a function of expressed intent and remorse. J. Soc. Psychol. 132: 525–537.
Landy, D., and Aronson, E. (1969). The influence of the character of the criminal and his victim on the decisions of simulated jurors. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 5: 141–152.
Lee, A. (1996). Public attitudes toward restorative justice. In Galaway, B., and Hudson, J. (eds.), Restorative Justice: International Perspectives, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, NY.
Lind, E. A. (1995). Social Conflict and Social Justice: Lessons From the Social Psychology of Justice Judgments, Available at: http://www.duke.edu/ ~alind/INAUG.html
Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York.
Lurigio, A. J., Carroll, J. S., and Stalans, L. J. (1994). Understanding judges' sentencing decisions: Attributions of responsibility and story construction. In Heath, L., Tindale, S., Edwards, J., Posavac, E., Bryant, F., Henderson-King, E., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., and Myers, J., (eds.), Applications of Heuristics and Biases to Social Issues, Vol. 3, Plenum Press, New York.
Lussier, R., Perlman, D., and Breen, L. (1977). Causal attributions, attitude similarity, and the punish-ment of drug offenders. Br. J. Addict. 72: 357–364.
Maguire, K., and Pastore, A. L. (1997). Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
Mattinson, J., and Mirrlees-Black, C. (2000). Attitudes to Crime and Criminal Justice: Findings From the 1998 British Crime Survey, Home Office, London.
McCold, P. (1996). Restorative Justice and the role of the community. In Galaway, B., and Hudson, J. (eds.), Restorative Justice: International Perspectives, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, NY.
McFatter, R. (1978). Sentencing strategies and justice: Effects of punishment philosophy on sentencing decisions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 36: 1490–1500.
McGarrell, E. F., and Sandys, M. (1996). The misperception of public opinion toward capital pun-ishment: Examining the spuriousness explanation of death penalty support. Am.Behav.Sci.39: 500–513.
McGillis, D. (1978). Attribution and the law: Convergence between legal psychological concepts. Law Hum. Behav. 2: 289–300.
Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M., and Agarie, N. (1989). Apology as aggression control: Its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 56: 219–227.
Pranis, K., and Umbreit, M. (1992). Public Opinion Research Challenges Perception of Widespread Public Demand for Harsh Punishment, Citizens' Council, Minneapolis.
Roberts, J. V. (1988). Public Opinion and Sentencing: The Surveys of the Canadian Sentencing Commission, Department of Justice Canada, Ottawa.
Roberts, J. V. (2003). Public opinion and mandatory sentences of imprisonment: A review of international findings. Crim. Justice Behav. 20: 1–26.
Roberts, J. V., and Stalans, L. (1997). Public Opinion, Crime, and Criminal Justice, Westview Press, Boulder.
Roberts, J. V., Stalans, L. S., Indermaur, D., and Hough, M. (2003). Penal Populism and Public Opinion.Lessons from Five Countries, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Robinson, D. T., Smith-Lovin, L., and Tsoudis, O. (1994). Heinous crime or unfortunate accident? The effects of remorse on responses to mock criminal confessions. Soc. Forces 73: 175–190.
Rossi, P., Simpson, J., and Miller, J. (1985). Beyond Crime Seriousness: Fitting the punishment to the crime. J. Quant. Criminol. 1: 59–90.
Russell, N., and Morgan, R. (2001). Sentencing of Domestic Burglary, Sentencing Advisory Panel, Available at: www.sentencing-advisory-panel.gov.uk/research/page 01.html
Scher, S. J., and Darley, J. M. (1997). How effective are the things people say to apologize? Effects of the realization of the apology speech act. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 26: 127–140.
Scottish Office (1996). Detailed Analysis of the 1996 Scottish Crime Survey Published Today, Available at: www.scotland.gov.uk/news/release98 2/pr1841.htm
Sessar, K. (1999). Punitive attitudes of the public: Reality and myth. In Bazemore, G., and Walgrave, L. (eds.), Restorative Juvenile Justice: Repairing the Harm of Youth Crime, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, NY.
Shaw, S. (1982). The People's Justice: A Major Poll of Public Attitudes on Crime and Punishment, Prison Reform Trust, London.
Sherman, L. (2002). Trust and confidence in criminal justice. Natl. Inst. Justice J. 248: 22–31.
Sita, N., and Edanyu, G. (1999). Awareness and Attitude of the Public Towards Community Service, Interim National Committee on Community Service, Available at: www.restorativejustice.org
Tonry, M. (2001). Symbol, substance, and severity in western penal policies. Punishment Soc. 3: 517–536.
Tufts, J., and Roberts, J. V. (2002). Sentencing juvenile offenders: Comparing public preferences and judicial practice. Crim. Just. Policy Rev. 13: 46–64.
Van Ness, D, and Strong, K. (2002). Restoring Justice, Anderson Publishing, Cincinnati, OH.
von Hirsch, A. (1993). Censure and Sanctions, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
von Hirsch, A., Roberts, J. V., Bottoms, A. E., Roach, K., and Schiff, M. (eds.) (2003). Restorative and Criminal Justice, Hart Publishing, Oxford.
Walgrave, L. (ed.) (2002). Restorative Justice and the Law, Willan Publishing, Cullompton.
Walgrave, L., and Geudens, H. (1997). The restorative proportionality of community service for juveniles. Eur. J. Crime Crim. Law Crim Justice 4: 361–380.
Wright, M. (1989). What the public wants. In Wright, M., and Galaway, B. (eds.), Mediation and Criminal Justice. Victims, Offenders and Community, Sage, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roberts, J.V., Stalans, L.J. Restorative Sentencing: Exploring the Views of the Public. Social Justice Research 17, 315–334 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SORE.0000041296.99271.52
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SORE.0000041296.99271.52