Abstract
This paper argues that self-interest and concern for others influence behavior through different cognitive systems. Self-interest is automatic, viscerally compelling, and often unconscious. Understanding one's ethical and professional obligations to others, in contrast, often involves a more thoughtful process. The automatic nature of self-interest gives it a primal power to influence judgment and make it difficult for people to understand its influence on their judgment, let alone eradicate its influence. This dual-process view offers new insights into how conflict of interest operate and it suggests some new avenues for addressing them or limiting some of their greatest dangers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., Issacharoff, S., and Camerer, C. (1995). Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining. Am. Econ. Rev. 85(5): 1337-1343.
Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In Uleman, J. S., and Bargh, J. A. (eds.), Unintended Thought, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 3-51.
Bargh, J. A., and Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. Am. Psychol. 54(7): 462-479.
Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., and Troetschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81(6): 1014-1027.
Bazerman, M. H., Loewenstein, G., and Moore, D. A. (2002). Why good accountants do bad audits. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(1): 87-102.
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 6. Academic Press, New York, pp. 1-62.
Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. Am. Psychol. 36: 129-148.
Burger, W. (1984). United States v. Arthur Young and Co. (Vol. 82–687): Supreme Court of the United States.
Chaiken, S., and Trope, Y. (eds.). (1999). Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, Guilford Press, New York.
Chartrand, T. L., and Bargh, J. A. (1996). Automatic activation of impression formation and memorization goals: Nonconscious goal priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71(3): 464-478.
Chen, S., Shechter, D., and Chaiken, S. (1996). Getting at the truth or getting along: Accuracy-versus impression-motivated heuristic and systematic processing. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71(2): 262-275.
Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., and Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 34(3): 366-375.
Dana, J., and Loewenstein, G. (2003). A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industry. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 290(2): 252-255.
Denes-Raj, V., and Epstein, S. (1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 66(5): 819-829.
Dugan, I. J., Berman, D., and Barrioneuvo, A. (2002, April 15). On camera, people at Andersen, Enron tell how close they were. Wall Street Journal, pp. 1-A.
Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In Pervin, L. A. (ed.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 165-192.
Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. Am. Psychol. 49(8): 709-724.
Epstein, S., Lipson, A., Holstein, C., and Huh, E. (1992). Irrational reactions to negative outcomes: Evidence for two conceptual systems. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 62(2): 328-339.
Frank, R., Gilovich, T., and Regan, D. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? J. Econ. Perspect. 7: 159-171.
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., and O'Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J. Econ. Literature 40(2): 351-401.
Freedman, J. L., and Fraser, S. C. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 4(2): 195-202.
Gilbert, D. T., Krull, D. S., and Malone, P. S. (1990). Unbelieving the unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59(4): 601-613.
Gilbert, D. T., Krull, D. S., and Pelham, B. W. (1988a). Of thoughts unspoken: Social inference and the self-regulation of behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 55(5): 685-694.
Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., and Krull, D. S. (1988b). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54(5): 733-740.
Gilovich, T. (1991). How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life, Free Press, New York.
Glover, Jonathan (2000). Humanity: A moral history of the twentieth century. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Gneezy, Uri, and Rustichini, Aldo (2000). A fine is a price. J. Leg. Stud. 29: 1-17
Gobet, F., and Simon, H. A. (1996). Recall of random and distorted chess positions: Implications for the theory of expertise. Mem. Cognit. 24(4): 493-503.
Grant, S. (2000, September 20). SEC Hearing on Auditor Independence [Web page]. Retrieved October 20, 2001, from http://www.sec.gov/rules/extra/hear0920.htm
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol. Rev. 108(4): 814-834.
Haney, C., Banks, C., and Zimbardo, P. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. Int. J. Criminol. Penol. 1: 69-97.
Hastie, R. (1984). Causes and effects of causal attribution. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46(1): 44-56.
Hastorf, A. H., and Cantril, H. (1954). They saw a game: A case study. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 49: 129-134.
Houston, W. (2000, April 18). Greatest Hits. Arista.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 108(3): 480-498.
Latane, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. Am. Psychol. 36(4): 343-356.
LeDoux, J. (1996). The Emotional Brain, Simon and Schuster, New York.
Lepper, M. R. (1973). Dissonance, self-perception, and honesty in children. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 25(1): 65-74.
Lieberman, M. D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D. T., and Trope, Y. (2002). Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 34, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 199-249.
Lifton, R. J. (2000). The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide, Basic, New York.
Loewenstein, G., and Lerner, J. (2002). The role of emotion in decision making. In. Davidson, R. J., Goldsmith, H. H., and Scherer, K. R. (eds.), Handbook of Affective Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 619-642.
Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., and Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychol. Bull. 127(2): 267-286.
McFatter, R. M. (1982). Purposes of punishment: Effects of utilities of criminal sanctions on perceived appropriateness. J. Appl. Psychol. 67(3): 255-267.
McRoberts, F. (2002, September 1). The fall of Andersen. Chicago Tribune, pp. 1–A.
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to Authority, Harper and Row, New York.
Monin, B., and Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81(1): 33-43.
Most, S. B., Simons, D. J., Scholl, B. J., Jimenez, R., Clifford, E., and Chabris, C. F. (2001). How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychol. Sci. 12(1): 9-17.
Robbins, A. (1986). Unlimited Power, Fawcett Columbine, New York.
Schneider, W., and Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: Detection, search, and attention. Psychol. Rev. 84(1): 1-66.
Schuetze, W. (1994). A mountain or a molehill? Account. Horiz. 8(1): 69-75.
Shiv, B., and Fedorikhin, A. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. J. Consum. Res. 26(3): 278-292.
Small, D. A., and Loewenstein, G. (2003). Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiably. J. Risk Uncertainty 26: 5-16.
Sontag, D. (2001, May 31). Sharon Scolds his Nation Over Calamity. New York Times, p. A8.
Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 16(1): 27-44.
Staw, B. M., and Ross, J. (1989). Understanding behavior in escalation situations. Science 246(4927): 216-220.
Stock, H. (2003, February 24). Companies reported record restatements last year. Investor Relat. Bus. 1.
Tenbrunsel, A. E., and Messick, D. M. (1999). Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Adm. Sci. Q. 44(4): 684-707.
Thompson, L., and Loewenstein, G. (1992). Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 51(2): 176-197.
van Knippenberg, A., Dijksterhuis, A., and Vermeulen, D. (1999). Judgment and memory of a criminal act: The effects of stereotypes and cognitive load. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 29(2): 191-201.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moore, D.A., Loewenstein, G. Self-Interest, Automaticity, and the Psychology of Conflict of Interest. Social Justice Research 17, 189–202 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SORE.0000027409.88372.b4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SORE.0000027409.88372.b4