Social Justice Research

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 171–187 | Cite as

Egocentric Ethics

  • Nicholas Epley
  • Eugene M. Caruso


Ethical judgments are often egocentrically biased, such that moral reasoners tend to conclude that self-interested outcomes are not only desirable but morally justifiable. Although such egocentric ethics can arise from deliberate self-interested reasoning, we suggest that they may also arise through unconscious and automatic psychological mechanisms. People automatically interpret their perceptions egocentrically, automatically evaluate stimuli on a semantic differential as positive or negative, and base their moral judgments on affective reactions to stimuli. These three automatic and unconscious features of human judgment can help to explain not only why ethical judgments are egocentrically biased, but also why such subjective perceptions can appear objective and unbiased to moral reasoners themselves.

egocentrism automaticity fairness ethics moral judgment moral reasoning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ambady, N., Bernieri, F., and Richeson, J. A. (2000). Towards a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of behavior. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 32, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 201-271.Google Scholar
  2. Babcock, L., and Loewenstein, G. (1997). Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases. J. Econ. Perspect. 11: 109-126.Google Scholar
  3. Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., and Issacharoff, S. (1996). Debiasing Litigation Impasse. Unpublished manuscript, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  4. Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., Issacharoff, S., and Camerer, C. (1995). Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining. Am. Econ. Rev. 85: 1337-1343.Google Scholar
  5. Banse, R. (1999). Automatic evaluation of self and significant others: Affective priming in close relationships. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 16: 803-821.Google Scholar
  6. Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, efficiency, intention, and control in social cognition. In Wyer, R. S., and Srull, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of Social Cognition, 2nd ed., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 1-40.Google Scholar
  7. Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Govender, R., and Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 62: 893-912.Google Scholar
  8. Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Raymond, P., and Hymes, C. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditional automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 32: 185-210.Google Scholar
  9. Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 20, Academic Press, New York, pp. 65-122.Google Scholar
  10. Batson, C. D., Klein, T. R., Highberger, L., and Shaw, L. L. (1995). Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: When compassion and justice conflict. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68: 1042-1054.Google Scholar
  11. Batson, C. D., O'Quinn, K., Fulty, J., Vanderplass, M., and Isen, A. M. (1983). Influence of self-reported distress and empathy on egoistic versus altruistic motivation to help. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45: 706-718.Google Scholar
  12. Brinol, P., and Petty, R. E. (2003). Overt head movements and persuasion: A self-validation analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84: 1123-1139.Google Scholar
  13. Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., and Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65: 5-17.Google Scholar
  14. Cain, D., Moore, D., and Loewenstein, G. (2003, September). The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Paper Presented at the Conference on Conflicts of Interest, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  15. Chartrand, T. L., and Bargh, J. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76: 893-910.Google Scholar
  16. Chen, M., and Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 25: 215-224.Google Scholar
  17. Cleckley, H. (1955). The Mask of Insanity. C.V. Mosby, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  18. Corey, S. M. (1937). Professed attitudes and actual behavior. J. Educ. Psychol. 28: 271-280.Google Scholar
  19. Dasgupta, N., and Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81: 800-814.Google Scholar
  20. De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., and Spruyt, A. (2001). Affective priming of pronunciation responses: Effects of target degradation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 37: 85-91.Google Scholar
  21. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 56: 5-18.Google Scholar
  22. Dijksterhuis, A., and van Knippenberg, A. (1998). The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of Trivial Pursuit. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74: 865-877.Google Scholar
  23. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., and Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 24: 207-213.Google Scholar
  24. Duckworth, K. L., Bargh, J. A., Garcia, M., and Chaiken, S. (2002). The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli. Psychol. Sci. 13: 513-519.Google Scholar
  25. Dunning, D. (1999). A newer look: Motivated social cognition and the schematic representation of social concepts. Psychol. Inq: 10: 1-11.Google Scholar
  26. Edwards, K., and von Hippel, W. (1995). Hearts and minds: The priority of affective versus cognitive factors in person perception. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 21: 996-1011.Google Scholar
  27. Epley, N. (2001). Mental Correction as Serial, Effortful, Confirmatory, and Insufficient Adjustment, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  28. Epley, N., Caruso, E. M., and Bazerman, M. H. (2004). Effects of perspective taking on judgments of fairness and actual behavior. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  29. Epley, N., and Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Divergent processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychol. Sci. 12: 391-396.Google Scholar
  30. Epley, N., and Gilovich, T. (in press). Are adjustments insufficient? Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. Google Scholar
  31. Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., and Gilovich, T. (in press a). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Google Scholar
  32. Epley, N., Morewedge, C., and Keysar, B. (in press b). Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. Google Scholar
  33. Fabrigar, L. R., and Petty, R. E. (1999). The role of the affective and cognitive bases of attitudes in susceptibility to affectively and cognitively based persuasion. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 25: 363-381.Google Scholar
  34. Fazio, R. H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility. In Pratkanis, A. R., Breckler, S. J., and Greenwald, A. G. (eds.), Attitude Structure and Function, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 153-179.Google Scholar
  35. Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., and Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 229-238.Google Scholar
  36. Ferguson, M. J., and Bargh, J. A. (2004). Liking is for Doing: Effects of Goal-Pursuit on Automatic Evaluation. Unpublished manuscript, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  37. Gilbert, D. T. (1989). Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. In Uleman, J. S., and Bargh, J. A. (eds.), Unintended Thought, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 189-211.Google Scholar
  38. Gilbert, D. T., Giesler, R. B., and Morris, K. A. (1995). When comparisons arise. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69: 227-236.Google Scholar
  39. Gilbert, D. T., and Gill, M. J. (2000). The momentary realist. Psychol. Sci. 11: 394-398.Google Scholar
  40. Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., and Savitsky, K. (2000). The spotlight effect in social judgment: An egocentric bias in estimates of the salience of one's own actions and appearance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78: 211-222.Google Scholar
  41. Gilovich, T., and Savitsky, K. (1999). The spotlight effect and the illusion of transparency: Egocentric assessments of how we're seen by others. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sc. 8: 165-168.Google Scholar
  42. Greenwald, A. G., and Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition. Psychol. Rev. 102: 4-27.Google Scholar
  43. Greenwald, A. G., Klinger, M. R., and Schuh, E. S. (1995). Activation by marginally perceptible (“subliminal”) stimuli: Dissociation of unconscious from conscious cognition. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 124: 22-42.Google Scholar
  44. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol. Rev. 108: 814-835.Google Scholar
  45. Haidt, J., and Hersh, M. (2001). Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 31: 191-221.Google Scholar
  46. Haidt, J., Koller, S., and Dias, M. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65: 613-628.Google Scholar
  47. Hare, R. D. (1993). Without Conscience, Pocket Books, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Hartshorn, H., and May, M. (1932). Studies in the Nature of Character: Studies in the Organization of Character, Vol. 3, MacMillan, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Hermans, D., Baeyens, F., and Eelen, P. (1998). Odors as affective processing context for word evaluation: A case of cross-modal affective priming. Cogn. Emotion 12: 601-613.Google Scholar
  50. Hermans, D., Spruyt, A., and Eelen, P. (2003). Automatic affective priming of recently acquired stimulus valence: Priming at SOA 300 but not at SOA 1000. Cogn. Emotion 17: 83-99.Google Scholar
  51. Higgins, T. E., Rholes, W. S., and Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 13: 141-154.Google Scholar
  52. How U.S., North Korea turned broken deals into a standoff (2003, March 5). The Wall Street J. pp. A1, A10.Google Scholar
  53. Kagan, J. (1984). The Nature of the Child, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Kant, I. (1964). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Paton, H. J. (trans.), Harper and Row, New York. (Original work published in 1785.)Google Scholar
  55. Keysar, B., and Barr, D. J. (2002). Self-anchoring in conversation: Why language users don't do what they “should.” In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., and Kahneman, D. (eds.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 150-166.Google Scholar
  56. Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., and Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychol. Sci. 11: 32-38.Google Scholar
  57. Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., and Horton, W. S. (1998). The egocentric basis of language use: Insights from a processing approach. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 7: 46-50.Google Scholar
  58. Klar, Y., and Giladi, E. E. (1997). No one in my group can be below the group's average: A robust positivity bias in favor of anonymous peers. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73: 885-901.Google Scholar
  59. Klar, Y., and Giladi, E. E. (1999). Are most people happier than their peers, or are they just happy? Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 25: 585-594.Google Scholar
  60. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In Goslin, D. A. (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, Rand McNally, Chicago, pp. 347-480.Google Scholar
  61. Krosnick, J. A., Betz, A. L., Jussim, L. J., and Lynn, A. R. (1992). Subliminal conditioning of attitudes. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 18: 152-162.Google Scholar
  62. Kruger, J. (1999). Lake Wobegon be gone! The “below-average effect” and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77: 221-232.Google Scholar
  63. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 108: 480-498.Google Scholar
  64. Lakin, J. S., and Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychol. Sci. 14: 334-339.Google Scholar
  65. Loewenstein, G., Issacharoff, S., Camerer, C., and Babcock, L. (1993). Self-serving assessments of fairness and pretrial bargaining. J. Leg. Stud. 22: 135-159.Google Scholar
  66. Lord, C. G., Ross, L., and Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37: 2098-2109.Google Scholar
  67. Luksa, F. (2003, June 14). Auction can't heal wounds for Bonds home run ball. The Mercury News. Retrieved July 27, 2003, from Scholar
  68. Messick, D. M., and Sentis, K. (1983). Fairness, preference, and fairness biases. In Messick, D. M., and Cook, S. (eds.), Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives, Praeger, New York, pp. 61-94.Google Scholar
  69. Murphy, S., Haidt, J., and Björklund, F. (2000). Moral Dumbfounding: When Intuition Finds No Reason. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
  70. Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 106: 226-254.Google Scholar
  71. Nickerson, R. S. (1999). How we know—and sometimes misjudge—what others know: Imputing one's own knowledge to others. Psychol. Bull. 125: 737-759.Google Scholar
  72. Nisbett, R. E., and Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol. Rev. 84: 231-259.Google Scholar
  73. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., and Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
  74. Pelham, B. W., Mirenberg, M. C., and Jones, J. T. (2002). Why Susie sells seashells by the seashore: Implicit egotism and major life decisions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82: 469-487.Google Scholar
  75. Piaget, J. (1965). The Moral Judgment of the Child, Gabain, M. (trans.), Free Press, New York. (Original work published 1932.)Google Scholar
  76. Prentice, D. A., and Miller, D. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 64: 243-256.Google Scholar
  77. Pronin, E., Puccio, C., and Ross, L. (2002). Understanding misunderstanding: Social psychological perspectives. In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., and Kahneman, D. (eds.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 636-665.Google Scholar
  78. Robinson, R., Keltner, D., Ward, A., and Ross, L. (1995). Actual versus assumed differences in construal: “Naïve realism” in intergroup perceptions and conflict. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68: 404-417.Google Scholar
  79. Ross, L., Green, D., and House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 13: 279-301.Google Scholar
  80. Schneirla, T. (1959). An evolutionary and developmental theory of biphasic processes underlying approach and withdrawal. In Jones, M. (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp. 27-58.Google Scholar
  81. Sollberger, B., Reber, R., and Eckstein, D. (2003). Musical chords as affective priming context in a word-evaluation task. Music Percept. 20: 263-282.Google Scholar
  82. Thompson, L., and Loewenstein, G. (1992). Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 51: 176-197.Google Scholar
  83. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124-1131.Google Scholar
  84. Uleman, J. S., Newman, L. S., and Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). People as flexible interpreters: Evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 28, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 211-279.Google Scholar
  85. Van den Bos, K. (2003). On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85: 482-498.Google Scholar
  86. Vorauer, J., and Ross, M. (1999). Self-awareness and feeling transparent: Failing to suppress one's self. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35: 415-440.Google Scholar
  87. Watercutter, A. (2002, October 18). Fighting over Bonds' baseballs. CBS News. Retrieved July 27, 2003, from Scholar
  88. Wegner, D. M., and Bargh, J. A. (1998). Control and automaticity in social life. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S. T., and Lindzey, G. (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 446-496.Google Scholar
  89. Wells, G. L., and Petty, R. E. (1980). The effects of overt head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1: 219-230.Google Scholar
  90. Wilensky, A. E., Schafe, G. E., and LeDoux, J. E. (2000). The amygdala modulates memory consolidation of fear-motivated inhibitory avoidance learning but not classical fear conditioning. J. Neurosci. 20: 7059-7066.Google Scholar
  91. Wilson, T. D., and Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychol. Bull. 116: 117-142.Google Scholar
  92. Wilson, T. D., and LaFleur, S. J. (1995). Knowing what you'll do: Effects of analyzing reasons on self-prediction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68: 21-35.Google Scholar
  93. Wilson, T. D., and Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 60: 181-192.Google Scholar
  94. Wilson, T. D., and Stone, J. (1985). Limitations of self-knowledge: More on telling more than we can know. In Shaver, P. (ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 6, Sage, New York, pp. 167-183.Google Scholar
  95. Wilstein, S. (2003, June 26). Bonds' No. 73 ball: A story of greed. NBC Sports. Retrieved July 27, 2003, from Scholar
  96. Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., and Park, B. (2001). Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81: 815-827.Google Scholar
  97. Zajonc, R. B. (1998). Emotions. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., and Lindzey, G. (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 591-632.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harvard UniversityCambridge

Personalised recommendations