Social Justice Research

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 129–142 | Cite as

Social Justice in Our Minds, Homes, and Society: The Nature, Causes, and Consequences of Implicit Bias

Abstract

Social injustice is disruptive both personally and collectively, and the ordinariness of implicit prejudice plays a role in this process. In this report, I discuss the correspondence between implicit and explicit biases, and factors that moderate their association. In addition, I differentiate between declarative and procedural definitions of implicit bias, which have implications for their nonconscious nature. To underscore their conceptual distinction, I also present evidence that points to different origins for implicit and explicit biases. Finally, actions for confronting implicit bias are prescribed.

implicit social cognition prejudice stereotypes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice, Addison-Wesley, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, E., and Massey, D. S. (2001). Problem of the Century: Racial Stratification in the United States, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Ashburn-Nardo, L., Knowles, M. L., and Monteith, M. J. (2003). Black Americans' implicit racial associations and their implications for intergroup judgment. Soc. Cogn. 21: 61-87.Google Scholar
  4. Ashburn-Nardo, L., Voils, C. I., and Monteith, M. J. (2001). Implicit associations as the seeds of intergroup bias: How easily do they take root? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81: 789-799.Google Scholar
  5. Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitudes can be measured. In Roediger, H. L., Nairne, J. S., Neath, I., and Surprenant, A. M. (eds.), The Nature of Remembering: Essays in Honor of Robert G. Crowder, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 117-150.Google Scholar
  6. Banse, R., Seise, J., and Zerbes, N. (2001). Implicit attitudes toward homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Z. Exp. Psychol. 48: 1145-1160.Google Scholar
  7. Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In Uleman, J. S., and Bargh, J. A. (eds.), Unintended Thought, Guilford, New York, pp. 3-51.Google Scholar
  8. Blair, I. V. (2001). Implicit stereotypes and prejudice. In Moskowitz, G. B. (ed.), Cognitive Social Psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 359-374.Google Scholar
  9. Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 6: 242-261.Google Scholar
  10. Boniecki, K. A., and Jacks, J. Z. (2002). The elusive relationship between measures of implicit and explicit prejudice. Representative Res. Soc. Psychol. 26: 1-14.Google Scholar
  11. Cokerinos, L. (2003). The Assault on Diversity: An Organized Challenge to Racial and Gender Justice, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
  12. Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., and Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, reliability, and convergent validity. Psychol. Sci. 121: 163-170.Google Scholar
  13. Dasgupta, N. (2004). Implicit ingroup favoritism, outgroup favoritism, and their behavioral manifestations. Soc. Justice Res. 17(2): 143-168.Google Scholar
  14. Dasgupta, N., and Asgari, S. (2003). Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping and self-stereotyping. Manuscript submitted for review.Google Scholar
  15. Dasgupta, N., and Asgari, S. (in press). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. Google Scholar
  16. Dasgupta, N., and Rivera, L. (2003). The road sometimes taken: How negative affect, perceiver sex, and target sex influence the path from implicit sexual prejudice to behavior. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  17. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 56: 5-18.Google Scholar
  18. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., and Beach, K. R. (2001). Implicit and explicit attitudes: Examination of the relationship between measures of intergroup bias. In Brown, R., and Gaertner, S. L. (eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 4: Intergroup Relations, Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp. 175-197.Google Scholar
  19. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., and Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interactions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82: 62-68.Google Scholar
  20. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., and Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 33: 510-540.Google Scholar
  21. Dunton, B. C., and Fazio, R. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 23: 316-326.Google Scholar
  22. Eagly, A. H., and Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychol. Rev. 109: 573-598.Google Scholar
  23. Egloff, B., and Schmukle, S. C. (2002). Predictive validity of the Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83: 1441-1455.Google Scholar
  24. Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 23, Academic Press, New York, pp. 75-109.Google Scholar
  25. Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., and Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes. A bona fide pipeline? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69: 1013-1027.Google Scholar
  26. Fazio, R. H., and Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 54: 297-327.Google Scholar
  27. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Row, Peterson and Company, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  28. Florack, A., Scarabis, M., and Bless, H. (2001). When do associations matter? The use of associations toward ethnic groups in person judgments. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 37: 518-524.Google Scholar
  29. Gaertner, S. L., and Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In Dovidio, J. F., and Gaertner, S. L. (eds.), Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 61-90.Google Scholar
  30. Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. Am. Psychol. 35: 603-618.Google Scholar
  31. Greenwald, A. G., and Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol. Rev. 102: 4-27.Google Scholar
  32. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., and Mellott, D. S. (2002a). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychol. Rev. 109: 3-25.Google Scholar
  33. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D., and Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74: 1464-1480.Google Scholar
  34. Greenwald, A. G., and Nosek, B. A. (2001). The health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. Z. Exp. Psychol. 48: 85-93.Google Scholar
  35. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., and Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: An improved scoring algorithm. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85: 197-216.Google Scholar
  36. Greenwald, A. G., Pickrell, J. E., and Farnham, S. D. (2002b). Implicit partisanship: Taking sides for no reason. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83: 367-379.Google Scholar
  37. Jost, J. T., and Banaji, M R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false-consciousness. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 33: 1-27.Google Scholar
  38. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., and Carvallo, M. R. (2002). Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38: 586-602.Google Scholar
  39. Judd, C. M., Park, B., Ryan, C. S., Brauer, M., and Kraus, S. (1995). Stereotypes and ethnocentricism: Interethnic perceptions of African American and White American college samples. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69: 460-481.Google Scholar
  40. Karpinski, A., and Hilton, J. L. (2001). Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81: 774-788.Google Scholar
  41. Livingston, R. W. (2002). The role of perceived negativity in the moderation of African Americans' implicit and explicit racial attitudes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38: 405-413.Google Scholar
  42. McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In Dovidio, J. F., and Gaertner, S. L. (eds.), Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 91-126.Google Scholar
  43. McConnell, A. R., and Leibold, J. M. (2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, explicit attitudes, and discriminatory behavior. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 37: 435-442.Google Scholar
  44. Monteith, M. J., Voils, C. I., and Ashburn-Nardo, L. (2001). Taking a look underground: Detecting, interpreting, and reacting to implicit biases. Soc. Cogn. 19: 395-417.Google Scholar
  45. Moody, J. (2001). Race, school integration, and friendship segregation in America. Am. J. Soc. 107: 679-716.Google Scholar
  46. Nosek, B. A., and Banaji, M. R. (2002). (At least) two factors moderate the relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes. In Ohme, R. K., and Jarymowicz, M. (eds.), Natura Automatyzmow, WIP PAN and SWPS, Warszawa, pp. 49-56.Google Scholar
  47. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., and Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dyn. Theory Res. Pract. 6: 101-115.Google Scholar
  48. Olson, M. A., and Fazio, R. H. (2002). Implicit acquisition and manifestation of classically conditioned attitudes. Soc. Cogn. 20: 89-104.Google Scholar
  49. Phelps, E. A., O'Connor, K. J., Cunningham, W. A., Funayama, E. S., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., and Banaji, M. R. (2000). Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12: 729-738.Google Scholar
  50. Plant, E. A., and Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75: 811-832.Google Scholar
  51. Rudman, L. A. (2004). Sources of implicit attitudes. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 13(2): 80-83.Google Scholar
  52. Rudman, L. A., Ashmore, R. D., and Gary, M. L. (2001). “Unlearning” automatic biases: The malleability of implicit stereotypes and prejudice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81: 856-868.Google Scholar
  53. Rudman, L. A., and Borgida, E. (1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 31: 493-517.Google Scholar
  54. Rudman, L. A., Feinberg, J. M., and Fairchild, K. (2002). Minority members' implicit attitudes: Ingroup bias as a function of group status. Soc. Cogn. 20: 294-320.Google Scholar
  55. Rudman, L. A., and Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. J. Soc. Issues 57: 743-762.Google Scholar
  56. Rudman, L. A., and Goodwin, S. A. (2003). [Priming male violence increases implicit pro-female bias]. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  57. Rudman, L. A., and Goodwin, S. A. (in press). Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: Why do women like women more than men like men? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Google Scholar
  58. Rudman, L. A., and Heppen, J. (2003). Implicit romantic fantasies and women's interest in personal power: A glass slipper effect? Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29: 1357-1370.Google Scholar
  59. Rudman, L. A., and Kilianski, S. E. (2000). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 26: 1315-1328.Google Scholar
  60. Rudman, L. A., and Lee, M. R. (2002). Implicit and explicit consequences of exposure to violent and misogynous rap music. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 5: 133-150.Google Scholar
  61. Schuman, H., Steeh, C., Bobo, L., and Krysan, M. (1997). Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  62. Towles-Schwen, T., and Fazio, R. H. (2003). Choosing social situations: The relation between automatically activated racial attitudes and anticipated comfort interacting with African Americans. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29: 170-182.Google Scholar
  63. Wilson, T. D., and Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychol. Bull. 116: 117-142.Google Scholar
  64. Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., and Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychol. Rev. 107: 101-126.Google Scholar
  65. Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., and Park, B. (1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72: 262-274.Google Scholar
  66. Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., and Park, B. (2001). Evaluative versus conceptual judgments in automatic stereotyping and prejudice. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 37: 244-252.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Tillett HallRutgers UniversityPiscataway

Personalised recommendations