Social Justice Research

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 25–46 | Cite as

The Aversive Racism Paradigm and Responses Favoring African Americans: Meta-Analytic Evidence of Two Types of Favoritism

Article

Abstract

This research examined conditions promoting favoritism for White targets and conditions promoting favoritism for African American (AA) targets. We extended research on the aversive racism paradigm through examination of reactions to AAs and Whites when normative behaviors or expressions of attitude clearly favored egalitarian responses and when evaluative criteria were ambiguous. We conducted a meta-analysis of 31 studies including more than 5000 participants. When norms were ambiguous, AA targets received worse treatment than Whites, supporting the presence of aversive racism. AA targets were treated even more positively than Whites when norms clearly favored positive reactions to all targets. We discuss results in terms of the aversive bias perspective, motivations to appear nonprejudiced, the flexible correction model, self-categorization theory, and shifting standards.

meta-analysis prejudice African American-favoring responses aversive racism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrams, D. (1999). Social identity, social cognition, and the self: The flexibility and stability of self-categorization. In Abrams, D., and Hogg, M. A. (eds.), Social Identity and Social Cognition, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 47-92.Google Scholar
  2. *Beers, M. J. (1998). Race of source and the elaboration likelihood model: Source attributions as potential mediators of message processing. Diss. Abtr. Int. 58: 11B(UMI no. 9815962).Google Scholar
  3. Begg, C. B. (1994). Publication bias. In Cooper, H., and Hedges, L. (eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 47-92.Google Scholar
  4. *Bettencourt, B. A., Dill, K. E., Greathouse, S. A., Charlton, K., and Mulholland, A. (1997). Evaluations of ingroup and outgroup members: The role of category-based expectancy violation. J. Exp. Psychol. 33: 244-275.Google Scholar
  5. Biernat, M., and Manis, M. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 66: 5-20.Google Scholar
  6. Biernat, M., Manis, M., and Nelson, T. E. (1991). Stereotypes and standards of judgment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 60: 485-499.Google Scholar
  7. *Biernat, M., Vescio, T. K., and Billings, L. S. (1999). Black sheep and expectancy violation: Integrating two models of social judgment. Eur. J Soc. Psychol. 29: 523-542.Google Scholar
  8. *Billings, L. S., Vescio, T. K., and Biernat, M. (2000). Race-based social judgments by minority perceivers. J. App. Soc. Psychol. 30: 221-240.Google Scholar
  9. *Carver, C. S., Glass, D. C., Snyder, M. L., and Katz, I. (1977). Favorable evaluations of stigmatized others. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 3: 232-235.Google Scholar
  10. *Castrianno Galante, L. M. (1999). Subtle racism and child welfare decision-making. Diss. Abtr. Int. 61, 01B. (UMI No. 9958390).Google Scholar
  11. *Chase, C. I. (1986). Essay test scoring: Interaction of relevant variables. J. Educ. Meas. 23: 33-41.Google Scholar
  12. Crandall, C. S., and Eshleman, A. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychol. Bull. 129: 414-446.Google Scholar
  13. *Dienstbier, R. A. (1970). Positive and negative prejudice: Interactions of prejudice with race and social desirability. J. Pers. 38: 198-215.Google Scholar
  14. Dovidio, J. F., and Gaertner, S. L. (1991). Changes in the expression and assessment of racial prejudice. In Knopke, H. J., Norrell, R. J., and Rogers, R. W. (eds.), Opening Doors: Perspectives on Race Relations in Contemporary America, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL, pp. 47-92.Google Scholar
  15. *Dovidio, J. F., and Gaertner, S. L. (2000). Aversive racism in selection decisions: 1989 and 1999. Psychol. Sci. 11: 315-319.Google Scholar
  16. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Kawakami, K., and Hodson, G. (2002). Why can't we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust. Cult. Divers. Ethnic. Minor. Psychol. 8: 88-102.Google Scholar
  17. Dunton, B. C., and Fazio, R. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 23: 316-326.Google Scholar
  18. *Fajardo, D. M. (1985). Author race, essay quality, and reverse discrimination. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 15: 255-268.Google Scholar
  19. *Frey, D. L., and Gaertner, S. L. (1986). Helping and the avoidance of inappropriate interracial behavior: A strategy that perpetuates a nonprejudiced self-image. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 1083-1090.Google Scholar
  20. *Gaertner, S. L. (1975). The role of racial attitudes in helping behavior. J. Soc. Psychol. 97: 95-101.Google Scholar
  21. *Gaertner, S. L., and Dovidio, J. F. (1977). The subtlety of white racism, arousal, and helping behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 35: 691-707.Google Scholar
  22. Gaertner, S. L., and Dovidio, J. F. (1981). Racism among the well-intentioned. In Clausen, E. G., and Bermingham, J. (eds.), Pluralism, Racism, and Public Policy: The Search for Equality, G. K. Hall and Co., Boston, MA, pp. 47-92.Google Scholar
  23. Gaertner, S. L., and Dovidio, J. F. (1986). Prejudice, discrimination, and racism: Historical trends and contemporary approaches. In Dovidio, J. F., and Gaertner, S. L. (eds.), Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 47-92.Google Scholar
  24. *Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., and Johnson, G. (1982). Race of victim, nonresponsive bystanders, and helping behavior. J. Soc. Psychol. 117: 69-77.Google Scholar
  25. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., and Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta Analysis in Social Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  26. *Hansen, J. J., and Harber, K. D. (2003). Quality of work moderates positive feedback bias to minorities. Poster session presented at Annual Meeting of Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  27. Harber, K. D. (1998). Feedback to minorities: Evidence for positive feedback. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73: 622-628.Google Scholar
  28. *Hass, R. G., Katz, I., Rizzo, N., Bailey, J., and Eisenstadt, D. (1991). Cross-racial appraisal as related to attitude ambivalence and cognitive complexity. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 17: 83-92.Google Scholar
  29. *Hodson, G., Dovidio, J. F., and Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Processes in racial discrimination: Differential weighting of conflicting information. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28: 460-471.Google Scholar
  30. *Jackson, L. A., Sullivan, L. A., and Hodge, C. N. (1993). Stereotype effects on attributions, predictions, and evaluations: No two social judgments are quite alike. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65: 69-84.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, B. T. (1989). DSTAT: Software for the Meta-Analytic Review of Research Literatures, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  32. *Johnson, J. D., Whitestone, E., Jackson, L. A., and Gatto, L. (1995). Justice is still not colorblind: Differential racial effects of exposure to inadmissible evidence. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 21: 893-888.Google Scholar
  33. *Kernahan, C., Barholow, B. D., and Bettencourt, B. A. (2000). Effects of category-based expectancy violation on affect-related evaluations: Toward a comprehensive model. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 22: 85-100.Google Scholar
  34. *Knight, J. L., Giuliano, T. A., and Sanchez-Ross, M. G. (2001). Famous or infamous? The influence of celebrity status and race on perceptions to responsibility for rape. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 23: 183-190.Google Scholar
  35. *Linville, P. W., and Jones, E. E. (1980). Polarized appraisals of out-group members. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38: 689-703.Google Scholar
  36. Lipsey, M. W., and Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical Meta-Analysis, Sage, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  37. Mackie, D. (1986). Social identification effects in group polarization. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 720-728.Google Scholar
  38. *Murphy-Berman, V. A., Berman, J. J., and Campbell, E. (1998). Factors affecting health-care allocation decision: A case of aversive racism? J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28: 2239-2253.Google Scholar
  39. Murrell, A. J., Dietz-Uhler, B. L., Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., and Drout, C. (1994). Aversive racism and resistance to affirmative action: Perceptions of justice are not necessarily colorblind. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 15: 71-86.Google Scholar
  40. *Norton, M. I., Vandello, J. A., and Darley, J. M. (2003). Moral Casuistry: Justifying and Rationalizing Social Category Bias. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  41. Olson, M. A., and Fazio, R. H. in press). Trait inferences as a function of automatically-activated racial attitudes and motivations to control prejudiced reactions. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. Google Scholar
  42. *Petty, R. E., Fleming, M. A., and White, P. H. (1999). Stigmatized sources and persuasion: Prejudice as a determinant of argument scrutiny. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76: 19-34.Google Scholar
  43. Plant, E. A., and Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75: 811-832.Google Scholar
  44. Plant, E. A., and Devine, P. G. (2001). Responses to other-imposed pro-Black pressure: Acceptance or backlash? J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 37: 486-501.Google Scholar
  45. *Rieger, B. P. (1996). Client race and achievment, therapist cognitive complexity and egalitarianism, and white therapist's attitudes. Diss. Abtr. Int. 57, 10B(UMI no. 9708256).Google Scholar
  46. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The “file-drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychol. Bull. 86: 638-641.Google Scholar
  47. Shadish, W. R., and Haddock, C. K. (1994). Combining estimates of effect size. In Cooper, H., and Hedges, L. (eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 47-92.Google Scholar
  48. *Skolnick, P., and Shaw, J. I. (1997). The O. J. Simpson criminal trial verdict: Racism or status shield? J. Soc. Issue 53: 503-516.Google Scholar
  49. *Sommers, S. R., and Ellsworth, P. C. (2000). Race in the courtroom: Perceptions of guilt and dispositional attributions. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 26: 1367-1379.Google Scholar
  50. *Sommers, S. R., and Ellsworth, P. C. (2001). White juror bias: An investigation of prejudice against black defendants in the American courtroom. Psychol. Public Policy Law 7: 201-229.Google Scholar
  51. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. Am. Psychol. 52: 613-629.Google Scholar
  52. Stephan, W. G., Boniecki, K. A., Ybarra, O., Bettencourt, A., Ervin, K. S., Jackson, L. A., McNatt, P. S., and Renfro, C. L. (2002). The role of threats in racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28: 1242-1254.Google Scholar
  53. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 33: 1-30.Google Scholar
  54. Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin, W. G., and Worchel, S. (eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA, pp. 47-92.Google Scholar
  55. Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In Lawler, E. J. (ed.), Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research,Vol. 2, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 47-92.Google Scholar
  56. Turner, J. C. (1987). The analysis of social influence. In Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., and Wetherell, M. S. (eds.), Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 47-92.Google Scholar
  57. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., and Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  58. *Vescio, T. K., and Biernat, M. (1999). When stereotype-based expectancies impair performance: The effect of prejudice, race, and target quality on judgments and perceiver performance. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 29: 961-969.Google Scholar
  59. Wegener, D. T., and Petty, R. E. (1995). Flexible corrections in social judgment: The role of naïve theories in corrections for perceived bias. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68: 36-51.Google Scholar
  60. Wegener, D. T., and Petty, R. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naïve theories of bias in bias correction. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 29, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 47-92.Google Scholar
  61. Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Social identity and group polarization. In Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., and Wetherell, M. S. (eds.), Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory, Basil, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 47-92.Google Scholar
  62. *White, P. H., and Harkins, S. G. (1994). Race of source effects in the Elaboration Likelihood Model. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67: 790-807.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyHumboldt State UniversityArcata
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyWestern Washington UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations