Skip to main content

Cultural Rights or Human Rights: The Case of Female Genital Mutilation

Abstract

The Women's International Conference in1995 in Beijing proposed the idea that women's rights be considered within the category of general human rights. Our concepts about human rights are rooted in the liberal traditions of a relatively homogeneous Western culture. In recent years, however, this culture has become increasingly heterogeneous. As a result of this greater diversity of beliefs and subcultures, some interesting challenges to these liberal traditions have arisen. An example of where such challenge elicits particularly divergent views is the issue of female genital mutilation, where the social and cultural rights of various subgroups appear to conflict with concepts concerning the human rights of an individual. Thus, this issue challenges a number of beliefs, including aspects of multiculturalism and feminism. In this article, I first examine the problem of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) within the context of multiculturalism, with particular emphasis upon feminism of women of color. Additionally, two opposing positions within the liberal multicultural approach—that of Kymlicka versus that of Kukathas—are then examined critically, and several rapprochements are offered. A final section focuses upon the implications of these issues for feminist women of color.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  • Afkhami, M., & Friedl, E. (Eds.) (1997).Introduction. In Muslim women and the politics of participation: Implementing the Beijing platform. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

  • Akulogu, J. (2000). Amnesty International Board Member interviewed for Ha'Aretz newspaper in Hebrew, February 4.

  • Anthias F., & Yuval-Davis, N. (1992). Racialized boundaries: Race, nation, gender, colour and class and the anti-racist struggle. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkovitch, N., & Bradley, K. (1999). The globalization of women's status: Consensus/dissensus in the world polity. Sociological Perspectives, 42(3), 481–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulbeck, C. (1998). Re-orienting Western Feminisms: women's diversity in a postcolonial world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. New York, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grillo, R. D. (1998). Pluralism and the politics of difference. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grillo, R. D. (1999). Pluralism and the politics of difference: State, culture, and ethnicity in comparative perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A. (1993). The challenge of multiculturalism in political ethic. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22(3), 171–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayter, K. (1984). Female circumcision-Is there a legal solution? Journal of Social Welfare Law, 6, 323–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. (1995). Human rights and the search for community. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A. (1998). Globalizing feminist ethics. Hypathia, 13(2).

  • Kukathas, C. (1986-87). Liberalism and its critics. Humane Studies Review, Winter, pp. 1-110.

  • Kukathas, C. (1996). Liberalism, communitarianism and political community. Social Philosophy and policy, 13(1), 80–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukathas, C. (1997). Cultural toleration. In W. Kymlicka, & I. Shapiro (Eds.), Ethnicity and group rights, (pp. 60–104). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukathas, C. (1992). Are there any cultural rights? Political Theory, 20(1), 105–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (1991). Liberalism, community and culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. In W. Kymlicka (Ed.), The rights of minority cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. T. (1997). Classifying cultural rights. In I. Shapiro & W. Kymlicka (Eds.), Ethnicity and Group Rights.New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalit, A., & Halbertal, M. (1994). Liberalism and the right to culture. Social Research, 61(3), 491–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1994). Citizenship and pluralism. Paper presented at The Israeli Forum for Legal and Political Philosophy, Jerusalem, Israel.

  • Okin, S. M. (1998, June) Thoughts on feminism and multiculturalism. Politika 1, 9–26. (in Hebrew)

  • Okin, S. M. (1998, July). Feminism and multiculturalism: Some tensions. Ethics, 108, 661–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panniker, K. N. (1996). Is the notion of human rights a western concept? In H. Steiner & P. Alston (Eds.), International human rights in context. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, B. (1999). Balancing unity and diversity. In D. Avnon & A. de-Shalit (Eds.), Liberalism and its practice.London: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulter, S. (1986). English criminal law and ethnic minority customs. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, H. J., & Alston, P. (1996). International human rights in context; Law, politics, morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, Y. (1998). Two notions of multiculturalism, Politicka, 79–93. (in Hebrew)

  • Taylor, C. (1994). Multiculturalism. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1985). Language and human nature. In C. Taylor (Ed.), Human agency and language philosophical papers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1988). The company of critics: Social criticism and political commitment in the twentieth century. London: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalev, H.D. Cultural Rights or Human Rights: The Case of Female Genital Mutilation. Sex Roles 51, 339–348 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000046617.71083.a6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000046617.71083.a6

  • female genital mutilation
  • human rights
  • women rights