Change in gender roles has been predominantly asymmetric: The roles of women have changed more than the roles of men. To explore the reflection of such asymmetry in the popular culture, we examined how books recommended to teachers and parents as “nonsexist” differed from books categorized as “sexist.” Multiple raters read a sample of elementary-level novels and rated the portrayals of various forms of sexism, including stereotypic personality, segregated work and family roles, status inequality, gender segregation, the traditional idealization of femininity, and unequal representation of the sexes. Although nonsexist books were more likely than sexist books to portray female characters who adopted male-stereotypic characteristics and roles, both types of books similarly portrayed female-stereotypic personality, domestic chores, and leisure activities. Such portrayals may contribute to the perpetuation of gender inequality, particularly if they are held up as examples of equality.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adler, S. (1992). Ms. Muffet fights back: A Penguin booklist taking a closer look at gender in children's books. London: Penguin Books.
American Library Association. (2002). Newbery Medal winners and Honor books. Retrieved August 26, 2002, from http://www.ala.org/alsc/newbpast.html.
Barclay, L. K. (1974). The emergence of vocational expectations in preschool children. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 4, 1-14.
Baruch, G. K., & Barnett, R. C. (1986). Father's participation in family work and children's sex role attitudes. Child Development, 57, 1210-1223.
Bem, S. L. (1978). Bem Sex-Role Inventory–Short form. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354-364.
Bem, S. L. (1983). Gender schema theory and its implications for child development: Raising gender-aschematic children in a gender-schematic society. Signs, 8, 598-616.
Berg-Cross, L., & Berg-Cross, G. (1978). Listening to stories may change children's social attitudes. Reading Teacher, 31, 659-663.
Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of labor. Social Forces, 79, 191-228.
Bordelon, K. W. (1985). Sexism in reading materials. Reading Teacher, 38, 792-797.
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676-713.
Buttenweiser, S. (1993, January/February). A children's garden of ... diversity. Ms. pp. 61-62.
Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171-1188.
Diekman, A. B., Goodfriend, W., & Goodwin, S. (2004). Dynamic stereotypes of power: Perceptions of change and stability in gender hierarchies. Sex Roles, 50, 201-215.
Diekman, A. B., McDonald, M., & Gardner, W. L. (2000). Love means never having to be careful: The relationship between reading romance novels and safe sex behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 179-188.
Eagly, A. H., & Diekman, A. B. (2003). The malleability of sex differences in response to changing social roles. In L. G. Aspinwall & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.), A psychology of human strengths (pp. 103-115). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Educational Paperback Association. (2002). The Educational Paperback Association's top 100 authors. Retrieved September 1, 2002, from http://www.edupaperback.org/top100.html.
Evans, L., & Davies, K. (2000). No sissy boys here: A content analysis of the representation of masculinity in elementary school reading textbooks. Sex Roles, 42, 255-270.
Fagot, B. I., Rodgers, C. S., & Leinbach, M. D. (2000). Theories of gender socialization. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 65-89). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Feminists on Children's Media. (1973). A feminist look at children's books. In Issues in children's book selection: A School Library Journal/Library Journal Anthology (pp. 107-115). New York: R. P. Bowker.
Flerx, V. C., Fidler, D. S., & Rogers, R. W. (1976). Sex role stereotypes: Developmental aspects and early intervention. Child Development, 47, 998-1007.
Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323-1334.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications of gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
Gooden, A. M., & Gooden, M. A. (2001). Gender representation in notable children's picture books: 1995–1999. Sex Roles, 45, 89-101.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701-721.
Heintz, K. E. (1987). An examination of sex and occupational-role presentations of female characters in children's picture books. Women's Studies in Communication, 11, 67-78.
Huddy, L., Neely, F. K., & Lafay, M. R. (2000). Support for the women's movement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 309-350.
Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). Another look at sex differences in preferred mate characteristics: The effects of endorsing the traditional female role. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 322-328.
Kinman, J. R., & Henderson, D. L. (1985). An analysis of sexism in Newbery Medal Award books from 1977 to 1984. Reading Teacher, 38, 885-889.
Knell, S., & Winer, G. A. (1979). Effects of reading content on occupational sex role stereotypes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 78-87.
Kortenhaus, C. M., & Demarest, J. (1993). Gender role stereotyping in children's literature: An update. Sex Roles, 28, 219-232.
Liben, L. S., Bigler, R. S., & Krogh, H. R. (2001). Pink and blue collar jobs: Children's judgments of job status and job aspirations in relation to sex of worker. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 346-363.
Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. F. (1981). A schematic processing model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 52, 1119-1134.
Prentice, D. A., Gerrig, R. J., & Bailis, D. S. (1997). What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 416-420.
Purcell, P., & Stewart, L. (1990). Dick and Jane in 1989. Sex Roles, 22, 177-185.
Ridgeway, C. L., & Diekema, D. (1992). Are gender differences status differences? In C. L. Ridgeway (Ed.), Gender, interaction, and inequality (pp. 157-180). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Rudman, L. A., & Borgida, E. (1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 493-517.
Rudman, L. A., & Heppen, J. (2003). Implicit romantic fantasies and women's interest in personal power: A glass slipper effect? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1357-1370.
Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America's schools cheat girls. New York: Scribner's.
Scott, K. P. (1981). Whatever happened to Jane and Dick? Sexism in texts reexamined. Peabody Journal of Education, 58, 135-140.
Scott, K. P. (1986). Effects of sex-fair reading materials on pupils' attitudes, comprehension, and interest. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 105-116.
Scott, K. P., & Feldman-Summers, S. (1979). Children's reactions to textbook stories in which females are portrayed in traditionally male roles. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 396-402.
Smith, N. J., Greenleaf, M. J., & Scott, C. J. (1987). Making the literate environment equitable. Reading Teacher, 40, 400-407.
Stones, R. (1983). “Pour out the cocoa, Janet”: Sexism in children's books. York, England: Longman for Schools Council.
Thoman, E. (2001). Skills and strategies for effective media education. Retrieved September 13, 2002, from the Center for Media Literacy website, on the World Wide Web: http://www. medialit.org/ReadingRoom/keyarticles/skillsandstrat.htm
Turner-Bowker, D. M. (1996). Gender stereotyped descriptors in children's picture books: Does “Curious Jane” exist in the literature? Sex Roles, 35, 461-488.
Twenge, J. M. (1997a). Attitudes toward women, 1970–1995. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 35-51.
Twenge, J. M. (1997b). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305-325.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2002). Labor force statistics from the current population survey. Retrieved September 13, 2002, from Bureau of Labor Statistics database (series IDs LFU600001 and LFU600002), on the World Wide Web: http://126.96.36.199/cgi-bin/srgate.
About this article
Cite this article
Diekman, A.B., Murnen, S.K. Learning to Be Little Women and Little Men: The Inequitable Gender Equality of Nonsexist Children's Literature. Sex Roles 50, 373–385 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000018892.26527.ea
- gender stereotypes
- children's literature