Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 50, Issue 1–2, pp 119–127 | Cite as

Physical Self-Concept and Sports: Do Gender Differences Still Exist?

  • Anne Torhild KlomstenEmail author
  • Einar M. Skaalvik
  • Geir Arild Espnes
Article

Abstract

Gender differences in physical self-concept among elementary- and secondary-school students were investigated. Physical self-concept was measured by the Physical Self-Description Questionnaire. The results indicated significantly higher physical self-concept in boys than in girls in eight subdomains, as well as global physical self-concept and self-esteem. Physical self-concept decreased with increasing age, and there was a significant age by gender interaction in the global physical, body fat, appearance, sports competence, and strength dimensions. Physical appearance was the subdomain that most strongly predicted global self-esteem. The present investigation demonstrated gender differences in multifaceted physical self-concept. Gender differences were large in the global physical, endurance, strength, appearance, and body fat-scales. In the health, flexibility, and coordination dimensions, gender differences were smaller.

physical self-concept gender age 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

references

  1. Aastrand, P. O., & Rodahl, K. (1986). Textbook on work physiology: Physiological bases of exercise (3rd ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six theories of child development (Vol. 6, pp. 1-60). Greenwhich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baur, J. (1989). Körper-und bewegungskarrieren: Dialektische analysen zur entwicklung von körper und bewegung im kindes-und jugendalter. Schorndorf: Karl Hofman.Google Scholar
  4. Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). Beauty and the beast. Psychology Today, pp. 42-46.Google Scholar
  5. Brooks-Gunn, J. (1986). The relationship of maternal beliefs about sex typing to maternal and young children's behaviour. Sex Roles, 14(12), 21-35.Google Scholar
  6. Brooks-Gunn, J., Graber, J. A., & Ohring, R. (2002). Girls' recurrent and concurrent body dissatisfaction: Correlates and consequences over 8 years. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 58, 404-415.Google Scholar
  7. Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 59-78.Google Scholar
  8. Byrne, B. M. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the life-span. Issues and instrumentation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  9. Carson, J., Burks, V., & Parke, R. D. (1992). Parent–child physical play: Determinants and consequences. In K. B. MacDonald (Ed.), Parent–child play. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  10. Chafetz, J. S. (1974). Masculine/feminine or human? An overview of the sociology of sex roles. Illinois: Peacock Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Clarke, Y. H., & Clarke, D. H. (1961). Social status and mental health of boys as related to their maturity, structural, and strength characteristics. Research Quarterly of the American Association of Health and Physical Education, 58, 326-334.Google Scholar
  14. Clarke, H. H., & Greene, H. H. (1963). Relationships between personal-social measures applied to ten-year-old boys. Research Quarterly of the American Association of Health and Physical Education, 58, 288-298.Google Scholar
  15. Crain, R. M. (1996). The influence of age, race and gender on child and adolescent multi-dimensional self-concept. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social, and clinical considerations (pp. 395-420). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Crocker, P. R. E., & Ellsworth, J. P. (1990). Perceptions of competence in physical education students. Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences, 15(4), 262-266.Google Scholar
  17. Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist, 58, 105-116.Google Scholar
  18. Deaux, K. (1985). Sex and gender. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 49-81.Google Scholar
  19. Deaux, K., & Kite, M. E. (1987). Thinking about gender. In B. B. Hess., & M. M. Ferre (Eds.), Analyzing gender (pp. 92-117). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). The structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 991-1004.Google Scholar
  21. Eccles, J. S., Adler, T., & Meece, J. L. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternative theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 26-43.Google Scholar
  22. Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children's self-and task-perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 58, 830-847.Google Scholar
  23. Entwistle, J. (1998). Sex/gender. In C. Jenks (Ed.), Core sociological dichotomies (pp. 151-165). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Evans, J., & Roberts, G. C. (1987). Physical competence and the development of children's peer relations. Quest, 58, 23-35.Google Scholar
  25. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 58, 429-456.Google Scholar
  26. Hargreaves, J. A. (1986). Where's the virtue? Where's the grace? A discussion of the social production of gender through sport. Theory, Culture and Society, 58, 109-122.Google Scholar
  27. Hargreaves, D., & Tiggemann, M. (2002). The effect of television commercials on mood and body dissatisfaction: The role of appearance activation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 58, 287-308.Google Scholar
  28. Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 58, 87-97.Google Scholar
  29. Harter, S. (1989). Causes, correlates, and the functional role of global self-worth: A life-span perspective. In J. Kolligian & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Perception of competence and incompetence across the life-span (pp. 67-97). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hattie, J. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Hayes, S. D., Crocker, P. R. E., & Kowalski, K. C. (1999). Gender differences in physical self-perceptions, global self-esteem, and physical activity: Evaluation of the physical self-perception profile model. Journal of Sport Behavior, 58, 1-14.Google Scholar
  32. Hoyt, W. D., & Kogan, L. R. (2001). Satisfaction with body image and peer relationships for males and females in a college environment. Sex Roles, 58, 199-215.Google Scholar
  33. Jacklin, C. N., DiPietro, J. A., & Maccoby, E. E. (1984). Sex-typing behaviour and sex-typing pressure in child-parent interaction. Sex Roles, 58, 413-425.Google Scholar
  34. Klomsten, A. T. (2002, August). Validation of the Physical Self-Description Questionnaire for use in Norwegian populations. Paper presented at the International biennial conference: Self-concept Research: Driving International Research Agendas, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  35. Kolnes, L. J. (2000). Heterosexuality as an organizing principle in women's sport. Kunnskap om Idrett, 58, 5-19.Google Scholar
  36. Langlois, J. H., & Downs, C. A. (1980). Mothers, fathers and peers as socialization agents of sex-typed play behaviours in young children. Child Development, 58, 1237-1247.Google Scholar
  37. Lintunen, T., Rahkila, P., Silvennoinen, M., & österback, L. (1984). Psychological and physical correlates of early and late biological maturation in 9-to 11-year-old girls and boys. In R. M. Malina (Ed.), Young athletes: Biological, psychological, and educational perspectives (pp. 85-91). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics books.Google Scholar
  38. Low, K. G., Charanasomboon, S., Brown, C., Hiltunen, G., Long, K., Reinhalter, K., et al. (2003). Internalization of the thin ideal, weight and body image concerns. Social Behavior and Personality, 58, 81-90.Google Scholar
  39. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Marsh, H. W. (1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early-childhood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 417-430.Google Scholar
  41. Marsh, H. W., Barnes, J., Cairns, L., & Tidman, M. (1984). The Self Description Questionnaire (SDQ): Age effects in the structure and level of self-concept for preadolescent children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 940-956.Google Scholar
  42. Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. (1997). Academic self-concept: Beyond the dustbowl. In G. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, achievement, and adjustment (pp. 131-198). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  43. Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2000, October). Swimming in the school: Expanding the scope of the big fish little pond effect. Paper presented at the Self Research Centre Conference, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  44. Marsh, H. W., Craven, R., & Debus, R. (1991). Self-concepts of young children aged 5 to 8: Their measurement and multidimensional structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 377-392.Google Scholar
  45. Marsh, H. W., & Redmayne, R. S. (1994). A multidimensional physical self-concept and its relation to multiple components of physical fitness. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 58, 45-55.Google Scholar
  46. Marsh, H. W., Richards, G. E., Johnson, S., Roche, L., & Tremayne, P. (1994). Physical Self-Description Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and a multitrait–multimethod analysis of relations to existing instruments. Sport and Exercise Psychology, 58, 207-305.Google Scholar
  47. Maehr, M. L., & Nicholls, J. G. (1980). Culture and achievement motivation: A second look. In N. L. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 221-267). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  48. Miller, A. G. (1970). Role of physical attractiveness in impression formation. Psychonomic Science, 58, 241-243.Google Scholar
  49. Miller, R. (1989). Effects of sport instructions on children's self-concept. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 239-242.Google Scholar
  50. Pomerleau, A., Bolduc, D., Malcuit, G., & Cossette, L. (1990). Pink or blue: Environmental gender stereotypes in the first two years of life. Sex Roles, 58, 359-367.Google Scholar
  51. Pfister, G. (1993). Appropriation of the environment, motor experiences and sporting activities of girls and women. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 58, 159-171.Google Scholar
  52. Rheingold, H. L., & Cook, K. V. (1975). The content of boys' and girls' rooms as an index of parent behaviour. Child Development, 58, 459-463.Google Scholar
  53. Richardson, L. W. (1981). The dynamics of sex and gender (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  54. Rodin, J., Silberstein, L. R., & Striegel-Moore, R. H. (1985). Women and weight: A normative discontent. In T. B. Sondereggen (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 32. Psychology and gender (pp. 267-308). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  55. Rosenblum, G. D., & Lewis, M. (1999). The relations among body image, physical attractiveness, and body mass in adolescence. Child Development, 58, 50-64.Google Scholar
  56. Rosenkrantz, P., Vogel, S., Bee, H., Broverman, I., & Broverman, D. M. (1968). Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 286-295.Google Scholar
  57. Ross, J. G., Dotson, C. O., Gilbert, G. G, & Katz, S. J. (1985). Maturation and fitness test performance. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 58, 45-50.Google Scholar
  58. Sands, E. R., Wardle, J. (2003). Internalization of ideal body shapes in 9–12-year-old girls. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 58, 193-204.Google Scholar
  59. Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Validation of construct and interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 58, 407-441.Google Scholar
  60. Sigall, H., Page, R., & Brown, A. C. (1971). Effort expenditure as a function of evaluation and evaluator attractiveness. Reports of Research in Social Psychology, 58, 19-25.Google Scholar
  61. Skaalvik, E. M. (1986). Sex differences in global self-esteem. A research review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58, 167-179.Google Scholar
  62. Skaalvik, E. M. (1997). Issues in research on self-concept. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 51-98). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  63. Spaeth, U., & Schlicht, W. (2000). Sportliche aktivität und selbst-und körperkonzept in der phase der pubeszenz. Psychologie und Sport Schorndorf, 58, 51-66.Google Scholar
  64. Stake, J. E. (1992). Gender differences and similarities in self-concept within everyday life contexts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 58, 349-363.Google Scholar
  65. Stern, M., & Karraker, K. H. (1989). Sex stereotyping of infants: A review of gender labeling studies. Sex Roles, 58, 501-522.Google Scholar
  66. Sørensen, A. D. (2003, February). The mainstreaming of pornography in mass culture. Paper presented at the third Baltic Sea Women's Conference on WoMen and Democracy: Pornophication of the Public Space, Tallinn, Estonia.Google Scholar
  67. Tanner, J. M., Whitehouse, R. H., & Takaishi, M. (1966). Standards from birth to maturity for height, weight, height velocity, and weight velocity: British children, 1965. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 58, 613-635.Google Scholar
  68. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1994). Children's competence beliefs, achievement values, and general self-esteem. Change across elementary and middle school. Journal of Early Adolescence, 58, 107-138.Google Scholar
  69. Wylie, R. C. (1979). The self-concept (Vol. 2). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  70. Wylie, R. C. (1989). Measures of self-concept. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Torhild Klomsten
    • 1
    Email author
  • Einar M. Skaalvik
    • 2
  • Geir Arild Espnes
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Sport SciencesNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyNorway
  2. 2.Department of Educational PsychologyNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyNorway
  3. 3.Department of Social Work and Health SciencesNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyNorway

Personalised recommendations