Skip to main content
Log in

On War, Peace and Armed Conflicts

  • Published:
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In general, the relationship between rule and conduct is dominated by the concept of linear causality: the legal rule causes effect in social practice. The case study on Article 96 of the Dutch Constitution (democratic procedures for the war declaration) and Article 102 of the Dutch Penal Code (the offence: aiding the enemy in war time) makes clear that this concept is too simplistic for the complex processes that took place. The clear dividing point between war and peace — i.e., the war declaration that initiates the legal state of war — no longer exists, since a third category —'armed conflicts' — that was 'constituted' in social practice and is positioned 'somewhere' between peace and war. Exact demarcation for this category is problematic. This phenomenon has far-reaching consequences for the meaning of the Articles, mentioned above.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Schooten, H. On War, Peace and Armed Conflicts. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 17, 169–183 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SELA.0000033620.24056.19

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SELA.0000033620.24056.19

Keywords

Navigation