Abstract
Various distributions of the Nobel laureates in physics in the 20th century and their discoveries are considered. It is shown that the time-interval between the discovery and its recognition can be approximately described by a lognormal distribution. The ratio of the numbers of laureates awarded for the experimental and the theoretical discoveries was rather different in various decades; this was determined by some “waves” of discoveries and in the initial period probably by some subjective factors. The probability to obtain this prize for the theorist is larger than for the experimenter. The main part of the awards was given to the scientists working in the main fields of modern physics: small distances and solid state physics. Some fields of physics such as mathematical physics, relativity, statistical physics were ignored completely. The worrying tendency of an increasing average age of laureates towards their retirement age is indicated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nobel Foundation Web Site www.nobel.se
J. VLACHÝ, Nobel prizes. A bibliography of scientometric papers and data sources, Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 295–301.
N. K. STAEHLE, Alfred Nobel and the Nobel Prizes, The Nobel Foundation, The Swedish Institute, Stokholm, 1993.
T. WASSON (Ed.), Nobel Prize Winners. An H. W. Wilson Biographical Dictionary, Vol. 1-2, The H.W.Wilson Company, New York, 1987.
B. FELDMAN, The Nobel Prizes: A History of Genius, Controversy and Prestige, Arcade, New York, 2000.
A. W. LEVINOVITZ, N. RINGERTZ (Eds), The Nobel Prizes: The First 100 Years, Imperial College Press, London, 2001.
R. M. FRIEDMAN, The Politics of Excellence: Behind the Nobel Prize in Science, Henry Holt & Co., New York, 2001.
P. RODGERS, Countdown to the Nobel prize, Physics World, 13 (10) (2000) 10–11.
T. BRAUN, Z. SZABADI-PERESZTEGI, É. KOVÁCS-NÉMETH, No-bells for ambiguous lists of ranked Nobelists as science indicators of national merit in physics, chemistry and medicine, 1901-2001, Scientometrics, 56 (2003) 3–28.
E. CRAWFORD, The Nobel Population: A Census of Nominators and Nominees for the Prizes in Physics and Chemistry 1901-1950, Universal Academy Press, Tokyo, 2001.
E. CRAWFORD, Nobel population 1901-1950: Anatomy of a scientific elite, Physics World, 14 (11) (2001) 31–35.
H. ZUCKERMAN, Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States, The Free Press, 1979.
P. E. STEPHAN, S. G. LEVIN, Age and the Nobel-prize revisited, Scientometrics, 28 (1993) 387–399.
R. M. FRIEDMAN, Quantum theory and the Nobel prize, Physics World, 15 (8) (2002) 33–38.
L. M. BROWN, A. PAUS, B. PIPPARD (Eds), Twentieth Century Physics, Vol. 1-3, Institute of Physics and American Institute of Physics Press, New York, 1995.
H. KRAGH, Quantum Generations: A History of Physics in the Twentieth Century, Princeton University Press, 1999.
P. RODGERS, Gluons Prize revives discovery debate, Physics World, 8 (9) (1995) 5–6.
Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme-2003, Web site www.aup.org/pacs/. It was used for the scientometric investigation of physics literature for example in: R. TODOROV, Distribution of physics literature, Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 195–209.
M. G. KENDALL, A. STUART, The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Charles Griffin, London, 1963.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karazija, R., Momkauskaitė, A. The Nobel prize in physics - regularities and tendencies. Scientometrics 61, 191–205 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000041648.87075.de
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000041648.87075.de