Skip to main content
Log in

Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper first describes the recent development that scientists and engineers of many disciplines, countries, and institutions increasingly engage in nanoscale research at breathtaking speed. By co-author analysis of over 600 papers published in “nano journals” in 2002 and 2003, I investigate if this apparent concurrence is accompanied by new forms and degrees of multi- and interdisciplinarity as well as of institutional and geographic research collaboration. Based on a new visualization method, patterns of research collaboration are analyzed and compared with those of classical disciplinary research. I argue that current nanoscale research reveals no particular patterns and degrees of interdisciplinarity and that its apparent multidisciplinarity consists of different largely mono-disciplinary fields which are rather unrelated to each other and which hardly share more than the prefix “nano”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2001), The construction of a discipline: Materials science in the United States, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 31: 223-248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BMBF, Nanotechnologie in Deutschland: Standortbestimmung, 2002.

  • Braun, T., A. Schubert, S. Zsindely (1997), Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance, Scientometrics, 38(2): 321-325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budworth, D. W. (1996), Overview of Activities on Nanotechnology and Related Technology, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, P. Trow (1994), The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., D. Hicks (1995), The classification of interdisciplinary journals: A new approach, In: M. E. D. Koenig, A. Bookstein, (Eds), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Learned Information, Melford, pp. 245-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., B. R. Martin (1997), What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26: 1-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. Th. (1990), Interdisciplinarity. History, Theory & Practice, Wayne State University Press, Detroit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosla, R. P. (2002), Nanotechnology in Japan, National Science Foundation, Tokyo Regional Office, Special Scientific Report #02-07, June 12.

  • Malsch, I. (1997a), The Importance of Interdisciplinary Approaches: The Case of Nanotechnology. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville

    Google Scholar 

  • Malsch, I. (1997b), Nanotechnology in Europe: Experts. Perceptions and Scientific Relations Between Sub-Areas, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malsch, I. (1999), Nanotechnology in Europe: scientific trends and organizational dynamics, Nanotechnology, 10: 1-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (2000), Patent citations in a novel field of technology: What can they tell about interactions of emerging communities of science and technology?, Scientometrics, 48: 151-178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (2001), Patent citations in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nanotechnology, Scientometrics, 51: 163-183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M., O. Persson (1998), Nanotechnology — interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application, Scientometrics, 42(2): 195-205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M., O. Persson, Y. Power (2001), Nanotechnology Expert Group and Eurotech Data, Mapping Excellence in Nanotechnologies. Preparatory Study for the European Commission, DG Research, [http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/era/pdf/nanoexpertgroupreport.pdf].

  • Morillo, F., M. Bordons, I. GÓmez (2001), An appoach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators, Scientometrics, 51: 203-222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC), Committee For The Review Of The National Nanotechnology Initiative, Division On Engineering And Physical Sciences (2002), Small Wonders, Endless Frontiers: A Review of the National Nanotechnology Initiative, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, pp. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science And Technology Council (NSTC) (2000), National Nanotechnology Initiative: The Initiative and its Implementation Plan. Washington, D.C., July, p. 13 [http://www.nano.gov/nni2.pdf]

  • Porter, A. L., D. E. Chubin (1985), An indicator of cross-disciplinary research, Scientometrics, 8: 161-176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, J., F. W. Lancaster, B. Allen (1997), Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48: 893-916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, L. (1992), A study of interdisciplinary research collaboration, Research Evaluation, 2: 169-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roco, M. C., W. S. Bainbridge (Eds) (2002), Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and the Cognitive Science, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schummer, J. (2003), Chemical versus biological explanation: Interdisciplinarity and reductionism in the 19th-century life sciences, In: J. E. Earley (Ed.), Chemical Explanation: Characteristics, Development, Autonomy, New York (Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 988), pp. 269-281.

  • Schummer, J., Interdisciplinary issues in nanoscale research, In: D. Baird, A. Nordmann, J. Schummer (Eds), Discovering the Nanoscale, book in preparation; electronic prepublication at http://www.cla.sc.edu/cpecs/nirt/papers.html

  • Stang, P. J. (2003), Editorial: 124 years of publishing original and primary chemical research, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 125: 1-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tijssen, R. J. W. (1992), A quantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology: coclassification analysis of energy research, Research Policy, 21: 27-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomov, D. T., H. G. Mutafov (1996), Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science, Scientometrics, 37: 267-278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schummer, J. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics 59, 425–465 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018542.71314.38

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018542.71314.38

Keywords

Navigation