Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 59, Issue 3, pp 345–389 | Cite as

Changes in the scientific output of Russia from 1980 to 2000, as reflected in the Science Citation Index, in relation to national politico-economic changes

  • Concepción S. Wilson
  • Valentina A. Markusova
Article

Abstract

Three features of the output of scientific papers from Russia which are covered by SCI are reported for the period 1980 to 2000. Changes are related to the major politico-economic developments in the USSR and Russia, and contrasted with similar data from France, Canada and Italy. The problems of isolating Russian papers in the output of the USSR and of estimating the proportion of Russian papers without stated addresses are treated. The Russian annual output grew from 1980 to 1990, but fell by 20-24% after the dissolution of the USSR in late 1991; from 1994 there has been an inconsistent partial recovery, and by 2000 the annual output had approximately regained its 1980 value. The reduced output in the 1990s derives mainly from low government funding for science. The proportion of Russian papers produced in collaboration with other nations has grown from six percent in the early 1980s to 31% in 2000, while the principal regions of collaboration shifted rapidly after 1990 from other republics in the USSR and East Europe to Western Europe and North America. These changes were initiated by glasnost and the end of the Cold War, and more recently have been driven in part by a need for foreign support. Russia's annual output in the physical sciences in the 1980s was approximately twice, and from 1995 to 2000, approximately four times, that in the life sciences. This continuing dominance, which contrasts with the comparison countries, derives from the high priority given by the central governments to defense spending and related prestige projects.

Keywords

Russian Science Locate Document Annual Output Scientific Output Russian Paper 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldhous, P. (1994). Biology: Elite groups struggle on with a little help from West. Science, 264(5163): 1264-1267.Google Scholar
  2. Allakhverdov, A. (1994). Battle expands over shrinking budget. Science, 263(5144): 166. (News & Comment).Google Scholar
  3. Allakhverdov, A. (1996). Russian scientists gain legal rights. Science, 273(5274): 424. (News & Comment).Google Scholar
  4. Allakhverdov, A., Pokrovsky, V. (1997). Russia: Science agency hit with a 55% cut. Science, 276(5319): 1639. (News & Comment).Google Scholar
  5. Anonymous. (1996). Down the test tubes. Economist, 340(7983): S10 (Book Review of The Economic Laws of Scientific Research, by T. Kealey, 1996).Google Scholar
  6. Balzas, K., Faulkner, W., Schimank, U. (Eds), (1995). The research system in post-communist central and Eastern Europe. Social Studies of Science, 25(4) November (whole issue).Google Scholar
  7. Berdashkevich, A. P. (2000). Science in Russia: Current state and prospects. Russian Education and Society, 42(12): 6-17.Google Scholar
  8. Braun, T., GlÄnzel, W. (1996). International collaboration: Will it be keeping alive East European research? Scientometrics, 36(2): 247-254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boesman, W. C. (1998). Research and Development in Russia: An Important Factor for the Future. Congressional Research Service (CRS) Report for Congress 98-739. National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington, DC. 16 pp.Google Scholar
  10. 11_2001-1.html [accessed 25 June 2003].Google Scholar
  11. Clery, D. (1994). Physics: A once-favoured discipline has the furthest to fall. Science, 264(5163): 1268-1270.Google Scholar
  12. David, P. A. (1997). From market magic to calypso science policy. Research Policy, 26(2): 229-255. (Book Review of The Economic Laws of Scientific Research, by T. Kealey, 1996.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dezhina, I., Graham, L. (1999). Science and higher education in Russia. Science, 286(5443): 1303-1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dialog (2003a). Dialog Home Page. Available: http://www.dialog.com [accessed 25 June 2003].Google Scholar
  15. commands-5.shtml [accessed 25 June 2003].Google Scholar
  16. Dickman, S. (1992). Cut off from the mainstream, Ukrainian science drifts. Science, 258(5079): 24-26. (News & Comment).Google Scholar
  17. Dickson, D. (1989). Gorbachev lifts funds for civil R&D. New Scientist, 124(1685): 23.Google Scholar
  18. Dyker, D. A., Radosevic, S. (Eds). (1999). Innovation and Structural Change in Post-socialist Countries: A Quantitative Approach. NATO ASI Series, 4. Science and Technology Policy, Vol. 20. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. European Commission (2002). R&D and Innovation Statistics in Candidate Countries and the Russian Federation. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. 147 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Fagerberg, J. (1987). A technology gap approach to why growth rates differ. Research Policy, 16(2-;4): 87-101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fortescue, S. (1992). The Russian Academy of Sciences and the Soviet Academy of Sciences: Continuity or disjunction? Minerva. 30(4): 459-478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garfield, E. (1990a). The Russians are coming! Part 1. The red-hot 100 Soviet scientists, 1973-;1988. In: Essays of an information scientist: Journalology, KeyWords Plus, and other Essays, 13: 202-215. Also available from: Current Contents, 24: 5-;18.Google Scholar
  23. Garfield, E. (1990b). The Russians are coming! Part 2. The top 50 Soviet papers most cited in the 1973-;1988 Science Citation Index and a look at 1988 research fronts. In: Essays of an information scientist: Journalology, KeyWords Plus, and other Essays, 13: 216-226.Google Scholar
  24. GlÄnzel, W., Schubert, A., Czerwon, H. J. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985-;1995). Scientometrics, 45(2): 185-202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gokhberg, L. (1999a). Russia: A Science and Technology Profile. British Council/Department of Trade and Industry. 134 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Gokhberg, L. (1999b). Transformation of R&D in the post-socialist countries: Patterns and trends. In: D. A. Dyker, S. Radosevic (Eds). Innovation and Structural Change in Post-socialist Countries: A Quantitative Approach. NATO ASI Series, 4. Science and Technology Policy, Vol. 20. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 153-172.Google Scholar
  27. Goldberg, A. I., Oigenblick, L., Rubin, A. H. E. (1997). Scientific articles and national medical cultures: A comparison of Russian and American medical journals. Scientometrics, 39(1): 57-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goodman, B. (1993). Noted researchers laud donation to Russian science. The Scientist, 7(1): 3.Google Scholar
  29. Gorelik, G. (1994). A blossoming under totalitarianism. Science, 264(5163): 1347-1349 (Book review of The Making of a Soviet Scientist, by R. Z. Sagdeev, 1994).Google Scholar
  30. Gorodnikova, N. (1999). Transformation of R&D in Russia: The role of government priorities. In: D. A. Dyker, S. Radosevic (Eds). Innovation and Structural Change in Post-socialist Countries: A Quantitative Approach. NATO ASI Series, 4. Science and Technology Policy, Vol. 20. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 203-228.Google Scholar
  31. Graham, L. R. (1998). What Have we Learned about Science and Technology from the Russian Experience? Stanford University Press: Stanford, California.Google Scholar
  32. Hall, N. (1994). Ground-based astronomy: New borders divide up a once-strong basic discipline. Science, 264(5163): 1274-1275.Google Scholar
  33. Hammond Incorporated (1979). Medallion World Atlas. Maplewood, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  34. Havemann, F. (2001). Collaboration behaviour of Berlin life science researchers in the last two decades of the twentieth century as reflected in the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 52(3): 435-443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hicks, D. M., Isard, P. A., Martin, B. R. (1996). A morphology of Japanese and European corporate research networks. Research Policy. 25(3): 359-378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. ISI (Institute of Scientific Information). (1992). ISI Online Databases on Dialog. SciSearch®, Social SciSearch®, Arts & Humanities Search® & Current Contents Search® User Guide. Philadelphia: ISI.Google Scholar
  37. Josephson, P. R. (1994). Russian scientific institutions: Internationalisation, democracy and dispersion. Minerva, 32(1): 1-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaiser, J. (1996). Russian research on the ropes. Science, 274(5294): 1827. (Science Scope).Google Scholar
  39. Kaiser, J. (1997). Russian grants to remain duty free. Science, 276(5315): 1019. (Science Scope).Google Scholar
  40. Katz, J. S. (1994). Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 31(1): 31-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kealey, T. (1996). The Economic Laws of Scientific Research. Basingstoke (UK): Macmillan; New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kealey, T. (1998). Why science is endogenous: A debate with Paul David (and Ben Martin, Paul Romer, Chris Freeman, Luc Soete and Keith Pavitt). Research Policy, 26(7-;8): 897-923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kealey, T., Rudenski, A. (1998). Endogenous growth theory for natural scientists. Nature Medicine, 4(9): 995-999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kerr, R. A. (1994). Earth science: Contacts with the West bring cultural revolution. Science, 264(5163): 1277-1279.Google Scholar
  45. Lattimore, R., Revesz, J. (1996). Australian Science: Performance from Published Papers. Canberra: Bureau of Industry Economics. Report 96/3.Google Scholar
  46. Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values, 17(1): 101-126.Google Scholar
  47. MacWilliams, B. (2001). Russia: Confidence despite adversity. In: Nature Year Book of Science and Technology. D. Butler (Ed.), New York: Palgrave/London: Nature Publishing Company, pp. 1354-1358.Google Scholar
  48. Markusova, V. A., Griffith, B. C. (1991). Highly cited Soviet journals in the physical and life sciences: A study of the function of journals. Scientometrics, 21(1): 99-113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Markusova, V. A., Arapov, M., Aversa, E. (1999). Collaboration between American and Russian scientists. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics, Colima, Mexico. Universidad de Colima, Colima, July 5-;8, 1999, pp. 323-330.Google Scholar
  50. Markusova, V. A., Minin, V. A., Libkind, A. N., Arapov, M. V., Jansz, C. N., Tijssen, R. (2001). Russian science in transition: The effects of new granting systems on research activity and output. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, July 16-;20, 2001. Vol. 1, pp. 427-438.Google Scholar
  51. Meske, W. (1999). Transformation of R&D in the post-socialist countries: Asset of liability? In: D. A. Dyker, S. Radosevic (Eds). Innovation and Structural Change in Post-Socialist Countries: A Quantitative Approach. NATO ASI Series, 4. Science and Technology Policy, Vol. 20. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 137-152.Google Scholar
  52. Miller, E. (Ed.). (1999). SBS World Guide. 7th edition. South Yarra, Victoria: Hardie Grant Books. Russian Federation, pp. 602-615.Google Scholar
  53. Mirskaya, E. Z. (1995). Russian academic science today: Its societal standing and the situation within the scientific community. Social Studies of Science, 25(4): 705-725.Google Scholar
  54. Miquel, J. F., Okubo, Y. (1994). Structure of international collaboration in science — Part II: Comparison of profiles in countries using a link indicator. Scientometrics, 29(2): 271-297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Narin, F. (1991). Globalization of research, scholarly information and patents — 10 year trends. Serials Librarian, 21(2/3): 33-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nelson, R. R. (1997). A science funding contrarian. Issues in Science and Technology, 14(1): 90-92. (Book Review of The Economic Laws of Scientific Research, by T. Kealey, 1996).Google Scholar
  57. Nelson, R. R. (1997). The problem of market bias in modern capitalist economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(2): 207-244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nolting, L. E., Feshbach, M. (1980). R&D employment in the USSR. Science, 207(4430): 493-503.Google Scholar
  59. Norman, C., Koshland, D. E. Jr. (1994). Science in Russia. Science, 264(5163): 1235. Editorial for Special Section Science in Europe '94: Russia, pp. 1259-;1282.Google Scholar
  60. Pavitt, K. (1998). The social shaping of the national science base. Research Policy, 27(8): 793-805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Peteri, G. (1995). On the legacy of state socialism in academia. Minerva, 33(4): 305-324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Possehl, S. R. (1997). Keeping life sciences alive in Russia. Aerospace America, 35(3): 42-47.Google Scholar
  63. Price, D. J. De Solla (1969). Measuring the size of science. Proceedings of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 6: 10-11.Google Scholar
  64. Russian science: Rockets into ploughshares. R. Sagdeev speaks to the Economist. (1990). Economist, 314(7647): 92. (Science and Technology).Google Scholar
  65. Russian science seen from the West (1994). Science, 264(5163): 1260-1261.Google Scholar
  66. 19_2001-1.html [accessed 25 June 2003].Google Scholar
  67. Salter, A. J., Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy, 30(3): 509-532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schiermeier, Q. (2000). Russia's prize fighter. Nature, 408(6811): 398-399. (News feature).Google Scholar
  69. Schubert, A., GlÄnzel, W., Braun, T. (1989). Scientometric data files. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries. Scientometrics, 16(1-;6): 3-478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schubert, A., Braun, T. (1990). International collaboration in the sciences, 1981-;1985. Scientometrics, 19(1-;2): 3-10. (World Flash on Basic Research).Google Scholar
  71. SCI (Science Citation Index ®). (2001). ISI (Institute of Scientific Information) Thomson Scientific. SciSearch® via Dialog.Google Scholar
  72. SCI (Science Citation Index ®) Guide and List of Source Publications. (1980-;1995). Philadelphia: ISI (Institute of Scientific Information).Google Scholar
  73. SCI (Science Citation Index ®) 2000 Guide & List of Source Publications. Philadelphia: ISI & Thomson Scientific. 2001.Google Scholar
  74. Science & Engineering Indicators. (2000). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/seind00 [accessed 25 June 2003].Google Scholar
  75. 25_2002-2.html [accessed 25 June 2003].Google Scholar
  76. 25_2002-2.html [accessed 25 June 2003].Google Scholar
  77. 17_2002-1.html [accessed 25 June 2003].Google Scholar
  78. Science in Russia: The diamonds in the rubble. (1997). Economist, 345(8042): 23-28.Google Scholar
  79. Sher, G. S. (2000). Why should we care about Russian science? Science, 289(5478): 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Shmakin, B. (1995). War on anti-science. Nature, 374(6522): 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Shughart, W. F. II. (1997). Managerial and Decision Economics. 18(5): 414-416. (Book Review of: The Economic Laws of Scientific Research, by T. Kealey, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sokolov, A. (1999). Statistics on information technology in Russia. In: D. A. Dyker, S. Radosevic (Eds). Innovation and Structural Change in Post-Socialist Countries: A Quantitative Approach. NATO ASI Series, 4. Science and Technology Policy, vol.20. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 419-428.Google Scholar
  83. Soros, G. (2000). Who lost Russia? New York Review of Books, 47(6): 10-16.Google Scholar
  84. Spurgeon, D. (2001). Optimism sweeps Canadian science. In: Nature Year Book of Science and Technology. D. Butler (Ed.), New York: Palgrave/London: Nature Publishing Company. pp. 556-560.Google Scholar
  85. Stefaniak, B. (1998). International cooperation of Polish researchers with partners from abroad: A scientometric study. Scientometrics, 41(1-;2): 155-167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Stone, R. (1998). A new initiative for Russian science. Science, 280(5368): 1336-1337. (News & Comment).Google Scholar
  87. Stoneman, P. (1997). Economic Journal, 107(442): 844-845. (Book Review of The Economic Laws of Scientific Research, by T. Kealey, 1996).Google Scholar
  88. Ulrich's International Periodicals Directory 1984. (1984). Twenty-third edition. R. R. Bowker Company. 2 vols.Google Scholar
  89. Ulrich's International Periodicals Directory 1987-;88. (1987). Twenty-sixth edition. R. R. Bowker Company. 2 vols.Google Scholar
  90. Ulrich's International Periodicals Directory 1992-;93. (1992). 31st edition. R. R. Bowker Company. 3 vols.Google Scholar
  91. Ulrich's Irregular Serials and Annuals 1987-;88. (1987). Thirteenth edition. R. R. Bowker Company.Google Scholar
  92. UNESCO Institute of Statistics. (2001) The state of science and technology in the world, 1996-;1997. Montreal, Quebec. 57 pp.Google Scholar
  93. Ushkalov, I. G., Malakha, I. A. (2000). The ‘brain drain’ as a global phenomenon and its characteristics in Russia. Russian Education and Society, 42(12): 18-34.Google Scholar
  94. Van Raan, A. F. J. (1999). Advanced bibliometric methods in the analysis of research performance and scientific developments: A contribution to science policy in transition countries. In: D. A. Dyker, S. Radosevic (Eds). Innovation and Structural Change in Post-socialist Countries: A Quantitative Approach. NATO ASI Series, 4. Science and Technology Policy, Vol. 20. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 89-105.Google Scholar
  95. 1357.0-WB.Google Scholar
  96. Webb, T. D. (1994). Societies aid in large-scale effort to support Russian science. The Scientist, 8(2): 3.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  97. Wilkie, T. (1996). British Medical Journal, 313(7058): 697. (Book Review of The Economic Laws of Scientific Research, by T. Kealey, 1996).Google Scholar
  98. Wilson, C. S., Osareh F. (2003). Science and research in Iran: A scientometric study. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 28(1): 26-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wines, M. (2001). At last, signs of economic revival in Russia. New York: The New York Times on the web. November 18, 2001.Google Scholar
  100. World Factbook 2002. Available: http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/rs.html [accessed 25 June 2003].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publisher/Akadémiai Kiadó 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Concepción S. Wilson
    • 1
  • Valentina A. Markusova
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Information Systems, Technology and ManagementUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.VINITI (All-Russian Institute of Scientific and Technical Information), Russian Academy of SciencesRussia

Personalised recommendations