The following paper is intended as an exercise in ‘friendly criticism’ of one of Harvey Siegel's and Mike Smith's (‘Knowing, Believing and Understanding’, this volume). I'm in substantial sympathy with the general thrust of their paper and my remarks merely provide some criticism of their discussion's conceptual coherence and clarity and a correspondingly slightly adjusted version of what they have to say. My focus is limited to the conceptions of knowledge, belief and understanding and their inter-relationships in terms of which they offer suggestions to science educators.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
About this article
Cite this article
Davson-Galle, P. Understanding: ‘Knowledge’, ‘Belief’ and ‘Understanding’. Science & Education 13, 591–598 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCED.0000042857.48342.a9
- Science Educator
- General Thrust
- Conceptual Coherence
- Friendly Criticism
- Substantial Sympathy