Russian Journal of Ecology

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 110–116 | Cite as

Zooplankton as an Indicator of the State of Lake Ecosystems Polluted with Mining Wastewater in the Kola Peninsula

  • O. I. Vandysh


The most informative characteristics of the zooplankton-community response to the effect of industrial wastewater from mines have been determined using water bodies of the Kola Peninsula as an example. It has been demonstrated that qualitative and quantitative characteristics of zooplankton depend on the degree of industrial pollution of a water body and adequately reflect differences in the conditions of zooplankton growth between the whole water bodies and their individual parts. The role of zooplankton as an indicator has been assessed and the possibility of including it in the system of monitoring of water objects has been substantiated.

zooplankton biomass species diversity water body pollution atmospheric discharge industrial wastewater ecological state 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aleksandrov, I.I., K faune bentosa kol'skikh ozer Bol'shogo i Malogo Vud''yavra (On the Benthic Fauna of Lakes Bol'shoi and Malyi Vud''yavr, Kola Peninsula), Kirovsk, 1930 (Archives of the Kola Research Center, Russ. Acad. Sci.).Google Scholar
  2. Andronikova, I.N., Using the Structural and Functional Parameters of Zooplankton in the System of Monitoring, in Gidrobiologicheskoe issledovanie morskikh i presnykh vod (Hydrobiological Investigation of Sea and Fresh Waters), Leningrad: Nauka, 1988, p. 47.Google Scholar
  3. Andronikova, I.N., Classification of Lakes by the Level of Biological Productivity, in Teoreticheskie voprosy klassifikatsii ozer (Theoretical Problems of Lake Classification), St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1993, p. 51.Google Scholar
  4. Andronikova, I.N., Strukturno-funktsional'naya organizatsiya zooplanktona ozernykh ekosistem raznykh troficheskikh tipov (Structural and Functional Organization of Zooplankton in Lake Ecosystems of Different Trophic Types), St. Petersburg, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. Balushkina, E.V. and Vinberg, G.G., The Relationship between Body Length and Weight in Planktonic Crustaceans, in Eksperimental'nye i polevye issledovaniya biologicheskikh osnov produktivnosti ozer (Experimental and Field Studies on Biological Bases of Lake Productivity), Leningrad, 1979, pp. 58-72.Google Scholar
  6. Den'gina, R.S., Ekosistema ozera Imandra pod vliyaniem tekhnogennogo zagryazneniya (The Ecosystem of Lake Imandra under the Effect of Technogenic Pollution), Apatity: Kol'sk. Fil. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1980.Google Scholar
  7. Evdokimova, G.A., Changes in the Intensity of Microbiological Processes in Lake Imandra in Connection with Its Pollution, Prir. Khoz. Severa, 1988, issue 16, p. 59.Google Scholar
  8. Fedorov, V.D., Kondrik, E.K., and Levich, A.P., Rank Distribution of Phytoplankton in the White Sea, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1977, vol. 236,no. 1, p. 264.Google Scholar
  9. Gliwicz, Z.M., Studies on the Feeding of Pelagic Zooplankton in Lakes with Varying Trophy, Ekol. Pol., 1969, vol. 17,no. 36, p. 663.Google Scholar
  10. Gordeeva-Pertseva, L.I. and Gordeeva, L.N., Peculiarities of Zooplankton Distribution in Karelian Lakes, in Syr'evye resursy vnutrennikh vodoemov Severo-Zapada (Raw-Material Resources of Inland Water Bodies of Northwestern Region), Petrozavodsk, 1968, pp. 31-44.Google Scholar
  11. Kanygina, A.V., Gidrobiologicheskoe i gidrokhimicheskoe issledovanie ozer Bol'shoi i Malyi Vud'yavr (Hydrobiological and Hydrochemical Studies of Lakes Bol'shoi and Malyi Vud''yavr), Syktyvkar, 1939 (Archives of the Komi Reserach Center, Russ. Acad. Sci.).Google Scholar
  12. Kitaev, S.P., Ekologicheskie osnovy bioproduktivnosti ozer raznykh prirodnykh zon (Ecological Bases of Biological Productivity of Lakes in Different Natural Zones), Moscow: Nauka, 1984.Google Scholar
  13. Moiseenko, T.I. and Yakovlev, V.A., Antropogennye preobrazovaniya vodnykh ekosistem Kol'skogo Severa (Anthropogenic Transformations of Aquatic Ecosystems of the Northern Kola Peninsula), Leningrad: Nauka, 1990.Google Scholar
  14. Rukovodstvo po gidrobiologicheskomu monitoringu presnovodnykh ekosistem (Manual of Hydrobiological Monitoring of Freshwater Ecosystems), St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1992.Google Scholar
  15. Ruttner-Kolisko, A., Suggestion for Biomass Calculation of Planktonic Rotifers, Arch. Hydrobiol. Ergebn. Limnol., 1977, vol. 8, pp. 71-78.Google Scholar
  16. Telesh, I.V., The Role of Planktonic Crustaceans in Aquatic Ecosystems of Different Types (Examples of Lake Ladoga, the Neva River, and the Gulf of Neva), Materialy VII s"ezda gidrobiol. obshch. Ross. Akad. Nauk (Proc. VII Conference of Hydrobiological Society, Russ. Acad. Sci.), Kazan, 1996, vol. 2, p. 90.Google Scholar
  17. Yakovlev, V.A., Evaluation of Long-term Changes in the Development and Structure of Zooplankton and Zoobenthos in a Large Subarctic Water Body (an Example of Lake Imandra), in Problemy khimicheskogo i biologicheskogo monitoringa ekologicheskogo sostoyaniya vodnykh ob''ektov Kol'skogo Severa (Problems in Chemical and Biological Monitoring of the Ecological State of Water Objects in the Northern Kola Peninsula), Apatity: Kol'sk. Nauchn. Tsentr, Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1995, p. 89.Google Scholar
  18. Yakovlev, V.A., Responses of Zooplankton and Zoobenthos to Changes in Water Quality in a Subarctic Water Body (an Example of Lake Imandra), Vodn. Resursy, 1998, vol. 25,no. 6, p. 715.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. I. Vandysh
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Industrial Ecology of the North, Kola Research CenterRussian Academy of SciencesApatityRussia

Personalised recommendations