Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Phylogenetic Study of Native North Eurasian Populations Using a Panel of Autosomal Microsatellite Loci

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic relationships among eight Siberian and Central Asian ethnic groups were examined using autosomal microsatellite loci. Genetic similarity of Buryats and Evenks, as well as close relationships between Tuvinians and Kyrgyzes, most likely resulting from the Altai-Slavic co-ancestry of their gene pools, was demonstrated. Studies of gene flow in these populations demonstrated that, in general, Turkic ethnic groups of Southern Siberia (Altaians and Tuvinians) were the recipients of more intense gene flow compared to Eastern Siberian populations belonging to Altaic family. The local Buryat populations displayed substantial differences in the direction and the level of deviation of the observed gene diversity from the expected one, which was probably caused by the differences in the degree of isolation and/or in effective population sizes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stepanov, V.A. and Puzyrev, V.P., Microsatellite Haplotypes of the Y Chromosome Revealed no Subdivision but Several Components of the Male Gene Pool of Tuvinians, Genetika (Moscow), 2000, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 377–384.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stepanov, V.A., Khar'kov, V.N., Soltobaeva, Zh.O., et al., Y-Chromosomal Haplotypes in the Central Asian Population, Genetika (Moscow), 2001, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 256–259.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stepanov, V.A. and Puzyrev, V.P., Population Genetic Analysis of Four Microsatellite Loci in the Tuva Population, Byull. Eksp. Biol. Med., 2000, vol. 129, suppl. 1, pp. 56–59.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stepanov, V.A., Puzyrev, V.P., Spiridonova, M.G., and Khitrinskaya, I.Yu., Analysis of the Alu Insertion Polymorphism in the Urban and Rural Populations of Siberia, Genetika (Moscow), 1999, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1138–1143.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stepanov, V.A., Khitrinskaya, I.Yu., and Puzyrev, V.P., Genetic Differentiation of the Tuva Population with Respect to Polymorphic Alu Insertions, Genetika (Moscow), 2001, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 563–569.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Khitrinskaya, I.Yu., Stepanov, V.A., and Puzyrev, V.P., Analysis of the Alu Polymorphism in Buryat Populations, Genetika (Moscow), 2001, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1553–1558.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stepanov, V.A., Spiridonova, M.G., Tadinova, V.N., and Puzyrev, V.P., Analysis of Genetic Diversity of the North Eurasian Population with Autosomal Microsatellite Loci, Genetika (Moscow), 2003, vol. 39, no. 10, p. 1381–1388.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weissenbach, J., Gyapay, G., Dib, C., et al., A Second-Generation Linkage Map of the Human Genome, Nature, 1992, vol. 359, pp. 794–801.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gyapay, G., Morisette, J., and Vignal, A., Genethon Human Genetic Linkage Map, Nat. Genet., 1994, vol. 7, pp. 246–339.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dib, C., Faure, S., Fizames, C., et al., A Comprehensive Genetic Map of the Human Genome Based on 5254 Microsatellites, Nature, 1996, vol. 380, pp. 152–154.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nei, M., The Theory of Genetic Distance and Evolution of Human Races, Jpn. J. Hum. Genet., 1978, vol. 23, pp. 341–369.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cavalli-Sforza, L. and Edwards, A., Phylogenetic Analysis: Model and Estimation Procedures, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 1967, vol. 19, pp. 233–257.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kimura, M. and Crow, J., The Number of Alleles That Can Be Maintained in Finite Population, Genetics, 1964, vol. 49, pp. 725–738.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ohta, T. and Kimura, M., The Model of Mutation Appropriate to Estimate the Number of Electrophoretically Detectable Alleles in a Genetic Population, Genet. Res., 1973, vol. 22, pp. 201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goldstein, D. and Pollock, D., A Review of Mutation Process and Methods of Phylogenetic Inference, 1997, http://lotka.stanford.edu/.

  16. Excoffier, L., Smouse, P., and Quattro, J., Analysis of Molecular Variance Inferred from Metric Distances among DNA Haplotypes: Application to Human Mitochondrial DNA Restriction Data, Genetics, 1992, vol. 13, pp. 479–491.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saitou, N. and Nei, M., The Neighbor-Joining Method: A New Method for Reconstructing Phylogenetic Trees, Mol. Biol. Evol., 1987, vol. 4, pp. 406–425.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harpending, H. and Ward, R., Chemical Systematics and Human Populations, Biochemical Aspects of Evolutionary Biology, Nitecki, M., Ed., Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1982, pp. 213–256.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eller, E., Population Substructure and Isolation by Distance in Three Continental Regions, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 1999, vol. 108, pp. 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Calafell, F. and Kidd, K., ABI Linkage Panel: Allele Frequencies in Global Population Samples, 1997, http:// info.med.yale.edu/genetics/kkidd/abiinfo.html.

  21. Okladnikov, N.P., To the Analysis of Early Development of Siberian Ethnic Groups: (The Population of the Baikal Region in the Neolithic and in the Early Bronze Age), Sov. Etnografiya, 1950, no. 2, pp. 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vasilevich, G.M., Evenki (Evenks), Leningrad, 1969.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stepanov, V.A., Spiridonova, M.G. & Puzyrev, V.P. Comparative Phylogenetic Study of Native North Eurasian Populations Using a Panel of Autosomal Microsatellite Loci. Russian Journal of Genetics 39, 1326–1333 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RUGE.0000004148.76125.ad

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RUGE.0000004148.76125.ad

Keywords

Navigation