Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Contamination and Cleaning of a Microfiltration Membrane in Filtration of an Aqueous Extract of Dog-Rose

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main factors responsible for decrease in the filtration flux (membrane throughput) in removal of pectin substances from an aqueous extract from dog-rose fruits and reasons for membrane contamination were studied. The method for membrane cleaning with distilled water and additional cleaning agents, aqueous solutions of NaOH and HNO3, was optimized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dytnerskii, Yu.I., Baromembrannye protsessy: Teoriya i raschet (Baromembrane Processes: Theory and Calculation), Moscow: Khimiya, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Huisman, I., in Crossflow Microfiltration of Particle Suspensions: The Influence of Hydrodynamics and Physico-Chemical Interactions, Lund (Sweden): Lund Univ., 1998, p. 110.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Howell, J., Sanchez, V., and Field, R.W., Membranes in Bioprocessing: Theory and Applications, London: Blackie Academic & Professional, 1993, p. 241.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Soifer, R.D., Zh. Vses. Khim. O_va. im. D.I. Mendeleeva, 1987, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 661–669.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Karbachsch, M. and Perl, H., Zh. Vses. Khim. O_va. im. D.I. Mendeleeva, 1987, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 669–673.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kozlov, M.P. and Dubyaga, V.P., Plast. Massy, 1982, no. 9, pp. 4951.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ghosh, R., J. Membrane Sci., 2002, vol. 195, no. 1, pp. 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tragardh, G., in Food Processing Recent Developments, New York: Elsevier Science, 1995, p. 233.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zeman, L.J. and Zydney, A.L., in Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration Principles and Applications, New York: Dekker, 1996, p. 256.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Altmann, J. and Ripperger, S., J. Membrane Sci., 1997, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marshall, A.D., Munro, P.A., and Tragardh, G., J. Membrane Sci., 1997, vol. 130, nos. 1–2, pp. 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gan, Q., Howell, J.A., Field, R.W., et al., J. Membrane Sci., 1999, vol. 155, no. 2, pp. 277–289.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Makardij, A., Chen, X.D., and Farid, M.M., Food Bioprod. Process., 1999, vol. 77, no. C2, pp. 107–113.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bird, M.R., in Cleaning and Disinfection in the Dairy and Food Processing Industries: Notes of Continued Education, Auckland Univ., School of Engineering in Association with ICI Chemical Cleaning, 1997, p. 123.

  15. Hatziantoniou, D. and Howell, J., 12th Annual Meet. of North American Membrane Society (NAMS), Lextington, KY (the United States), 2001, p. 63.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sagdullaev, B.T., Safonova, E.V. & Khodzhaeva, M.A. Effect of Contamination and Cleaning of a Microfiltration Membrane in Filtration of an Aqueous Extract of Dog-Rose. Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry 76, 1479–1482 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RJAC.0000012671.53851.68

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RJAC.0000012671.53851.68

Keywords

Navigation