Abstract
We report on an investigation of students' ideas about gravity after a semester of instruction in physics at university. There are two aspects to the study which was concerned with students' answers to a carefully designed qualitative examination question on gravity. The first aspect is a classification of the answers and a comparative study of the ways the problem was tackled by two large groups of students who had different backgrounds in physics and were exposed to different teaching styles. The second aspect is to investigate how students link concepts to solve the problem. We used a phenomenographic analysis of student responses to extract patterns of reasoning and alternative conceptions behind the solutions. We found no differences between the classes of answers given by students in the two courses. Our analysis also identifies a hierarchy in the complexity of the hypothetical reasoning pathways, which we interpret as reflecting the ways in which students may link concepts and resolve conflicts as they solve the problem. The hypothetical reasoning pathways may help educators to develop instructional material or lecture room dialogue in order to tease out key issues. An unexpected finding is that there is a discrepancy between our conclusion that the two groups of answers are similar and the distribution of marks awarded by the examiner – which implies that the quality of the answers is different for the two groups.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arons, A. B. (1976). Cultivating the capacity for formal reasoning: Objectives and procedures in an introductory physical science course. American Journal of Physics, 44, 834–838.
Arons, A. B. (1984). Student patterns of thinking and reasoning. The Physics Teacher, 22, 88–93.
Bolton, J., & Ross, S. (1997). Developing students' physics problem-solving skills. Physics Education, 32, 176–185.
Boo, H., & Toh, K. (1998). An investigation on the scientific thinking ability of fourth year university students. Research in Science Education, 28, 491–506.
Booth, S. (1997). On phenomenography, learning and teaching. Higher Education Research and Development, 16, 135–158.
Caillot, M., & Dumas-Carré, A. (1990). Teaching decision-making to solve textbook problems. In H. Mandl, E. de Corte, N. Bennett, & H. F. Friedrich, (Eds.), Learning and instruction (Vol. 2.2, pp. 67–84). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 7–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Compton, C. A. (1970). Exercises are not problems. The Physics Teacher, 8, 235–240.
Dall'Alba, G., Walsh, E., Bowden, J., Martin, E., Masters, G., Ramsden, P., et al. (1993). Textbook treatments and students' understanding of acceleration. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 621–635.
de Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. M. (1986). Cognitive structures of good and poor novice problem solvers in physics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 279–288.
Eylon, B., & Reif, F. (1984). Effects of knowledge organisation on task performance. Cognition and Instruction,7, 5–44.
Galili, I. (1995). Interpretation of students' understanding of the concept of weightlessness. Research in Science Education, 25, 51–74
Galili, I. (2001). Weight versus gravitational force: Historical and educational perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 1073–1093.
Galili, I., & Bar, V. (1997). Children's operational knowledge about weight. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 317–340.
Galili, I., & Kaplan, D. (1996). Students' operations with the weight concept. Science Education, 80(4), 457–487.
Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourse. London: Falmer.
Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1980). A matter of gravity. Research in Science Education, 10, 35–44.
Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1981). Understanding of gravity. Science Education, 65, 291–299.
Gunstone, R. F., & Watts, M. (1985). Force and motion. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children's ideas in science (pp. 85–104). Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
Iona, M. (1988). Weightlessness and microgravity. The Physics Teacher, 26, 72.
Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (1997). Fundamentals of physics, extended (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.
Heller, K., Heller, P., & Hollabaugh, M. (1993). Cooperative group problem solving in physics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Heller, P., & Heller, K. (1999). Cooperative group problem solving in physics.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota. http://groups.physics.umn.edu/physed/ Research/CGPS/CGPSintro.htm
Heller, P., & Hollabaugh, M. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics, 60(7), 637–644.
Laurillard, D. (1984). Learning from problem solving. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 124–143). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press.
Leonard, W. J., Dufresne, R. J., & Mestre, J. P. (1996). Using qualitative problem-solving strategies to highlight the role of conceptual knowledge in solving problems. American Journal of Physics, 64, 1495–1503.
Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I-outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.
Marton, F., & Trigwell, K. (2000). Variatio est mater studiorum. Higher Education Research & Development, 19, 381–395.
McDermott, L. C., Shaffer, P. S., & Somers, M. D. (1994). Research as a guide to teaching introductory mechanics: An illustration in the context of the Atwood's machine. American Journal of Physics, 62, 46–54.
McGowan, L. (1987). Down with microgravity. The Physics Teacher, 25, 137.
Minstrell, J. (1982). Conceptual development research in the natural setting of the classroom. In M. B. Rowe (Ed.), Education for the 80's: Science. Washington, DC: National Education Association
Palmer, D. (2001). Students' alternative conceptions and scientifically acceptable conceptions about gravity. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 691–706.
Prosser, M., & Millar, R. (1989). The how and what of learning physics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 4, 513–528.
Reif, F., Larkin, J. H., & Brackett, G. C. (1976). Teaching general learning and problem-solving skills. American Journal of Physics, 44, 212–217.
Ride, S. (1993). Physics in weightlessness. In D. Halliday, R. Resnick, & J. Walker, Fundamentals of physics, extended (4th ed., pp. E3-1 to E3-4). New York: Wiley.
Rigden, J. S. (1987). Problem-solving skills: What does it mean? American Journal of Physics, 55, 877.
Ruggiero, S., Cartelli, A., Dupré, F., & Vicentini-Missoni, M. (1985). Weight, gravity and air pressure: Mental representations by Italian middle school pupils. European Journal of Science Education, 7, 181–194.
Sharma, M. D., Millar R. M., & Seth, S. (1999). Workshop tutorials: Accommodating student centred learning in large first year university physics classes. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 839–853.
Stables, G. (1973). Weight, g and weightlessness. Physics Education, 8, 61–62.
Svensson, L. (1977). Learning processes and strategies-III on qualitative differences in learning: III-study skill and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 233–243.
Svensson, L. (1997). Theoretical foundations of phenomenography. Higher Education Research and Development, 16, 159–171.
Van Heuvelen, A. (1991). Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instructional strategies. American Journal of Physics, 59, 891–897.
Watts, M. (1982). Gravity-don't take it for granted. Physics Education, 17, 116–121.
White, R., Gunstone, R., Elterman, E., Macdonald, I., McKittrick, B., Mills, D., & Mulhall, P. (1995). Students' perceptions of teaching and learning in first-year university physics. Research in Science Education, 25, 465–478.
Zajchowski, R., & Martin, J. (1993). Differences in the problem solving of stronger and weaker novices in physics: Knowledge, strategies, or knowledge structure? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 459–470.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, M.D., Millar, R.M., Smith, A. et al. Students' Understandings of Gravity in an Orbiting Space-Ship. Research in Science Education 34, 267–289 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000044605.00448.bd
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000044605.00448.bd