Abstract
Interpretation and construction of graphs are central to the study of physics and to performance in physics. In this paper, I explore the interpretation and construction processes called upon in questions with a graphical component, in Western Australian Physics Tertiary Entrance Examinations. In addition, I list errors made by students as reported by examiners and offer explanations for the errors. Outcomes of the inquiry are the identification of sources of challenge in the graphing questions, including requirements to calculate gradient and analyse experimental data. I also identify question structures that could be barriers to students' understanding the examination questions. The micro-analysis of graphing in one jurisdiction can inform assessment of high-school physics in general.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berg, C. A., & Smith, P. (1994). Assessing students' abilities to construct and interpret line graphs: Disparities between multiple-choice and free-response instruments. Science Education, 78, 527–554.
Curriculum Council. (1994a-2001a). Physics, Tertiary Entrance Examination. Perth, Australia: Curriculum Council.
Curriculum Council. (1994b-2001b). Physics, Tertiary Entrance Examination Report. Perth, Australia: Curriculum Council.
Curriculum Council. (2000c). 2000 /2001 Syllabus Manual Year 11 and Year 12 subjects.Perth, Australia: Curriculum Council.
Forster, P. A. (2002). An investigation of disjuncture between graphing in school mathematics and school physics. In B. Barton, K. C. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch, & M. O. J. Thomas (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-third annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 268-275). Auckland, New Zealand: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Forster P. A., & Mueller, U. (2000). Diversity and difficulties with graphics calculator usage in the 1999 calculus tertiary entrance examination in Western Australia. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 14(1), 4–15
Hershkowitz, R., Schwarz, B. B., & Dreyfus, T. (2001). Abstraction in context: Epistemic actions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 195–222.
Jones, G. A., Rich, B. S., & Day, R. (1996). The assessment of a complex problem: The bunjee jump project. School Science and Mathematics, 96(2), 68–74.
Kaput, J. J. (1998). Representations, inscriptions, descriptions and learning: A klaidescope of windows. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 265–281.
Lemke, J. L. (1995). Textual politics. London: Taylor and Francis.
Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 1–64.
Livingston, E. (1987). Making sense of ethnomethodology. London: Routledge.
Roth, W.-M. (1996). Where is the context in contextual word problems? Mathematical practices and products in Grade 8 students' answers to story problems. Cognition and Instruction, 14(4), 487–527.
Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (2001). Professionals read graphs: A semiotic analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 59–194.
Roth, W.-M., Bowen, G. M., & McGinn, M. G. (1999). Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(9), 977–1019.
Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. G. (1997). Graphing: Cognitive ability or practice. Science Education, 81, 91–106.
Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. G. (1998). Inscriptions: Towards a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 35–59.
Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36.
Soufalis, N., Gianatti, S., Gianatti, F., Stocklmayer, S., Thomas, G., & Yeo, S. (1994a). Physics in context-Year 12. Perth, Australia: Science Teachers' Association of WA.
Soufalis, N., Gianatti, S., Gianatti, F., Thomas, G., & Donaldson, P. (1994b). Physics investigations in context. Year 12. Perth, Australia: Science Teachers' Association of WA.
Woolnough, J. (1998). How do students learn to apply their mathematical knowledge to interpret graphs in physics? Research in Science Education, 30(3), 259–267.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forster, P.A. Graphing in Physics: Processes and Sources of Error in Tertiary Entrance Examinations in Western Australia. Research in Science Education 34, 239–265 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000044597.10584.1a
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000044597.10584.1a