Abstract
In this study, the cognitive characteristics of students' decision-making processes centered on phases, difficulties, and strategies are analysed in the personal dailylife context involving biological knowledge. The subjects were first year science and general high school students in Seoul, Korea; 6 female students and 7 male students. The students' decision-making processes were analysed by “think-aloud” and participant observation methods. On the whole, the students' decision-making processes progressed in following order: recognizing a problem, searching for alternatives, evaluating the alternatives, and decision. During the decision-making processes, the above phases were repeated by trial and error. Students preferred noncompensatory rules that did not allow trade offs among alternatives for decisions, rather than compensatory rules of selection. Students had a tendency to have difficulties in analysing the difference between initial state and desirable state of the problem, organising biological knowledge-related problems, and clarifying values as selective criteria. Even students who had high achievement and more positive science-related attitudes did not apply biological knowledge to search for alternatives, and could not utilise scientific values as selective criteria very well. We discuss the implications of these results for teaching of decision-making in respect to scientific literacy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ableson, R. P., & Levi, A. (1985). Decision making and decision theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 231–309). New York: Ramdom House.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1989). Decision-making theories as tools for interpreting student behavior during a scientific inquiry simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(3), 189–203.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1985). Collective decision making in the social context of science. Science Education, 69(4), 453–475.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1991). Logical reasoning in science and technology. Toronto, Canada: Wiley.
Baron, J., Granato, L., Spranca, M., & Teubal, E. (1993). Decision-making biases in children and early adolescents: Exploratory studies. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(1), 22–46.
Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision process: A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 234–248.
Beyth-Marom, R., Fischoff, B., Jacobs Q. M., & Furby, L. (1991). Teaching decision-making to adolescents: A critical review. In J. Baron & R. Brown (Eds.), Teaching decision making to adolescents (pp. 19–59). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 1–40.
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.
de Jager, H., & van der Loo, F. (1990). Decision making in environmental education: Notes from research in the Dutch nme-vo project. Journal of Environmental Education, 22(1), 33–42.
Dreyfus, A., & Jungwirth, E. (1980). A comparison of the "prompting effect" of out-of school with that of in-school contexts on certain aspects of critical thinking. European Journal of Science Education, 2(3), 301–310.
Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and Paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Verbal protocol analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fraser, J. B. (1981). Test of science-related attitudes. Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Fullick, P., & Ratcliffe, M. (<nt>Eds.</nt>). (1996). Teaching ethical aspects of science. Southampton, UK: The Bassett Press.
Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How metal systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107–119.
Heyworth, R., M. (1999). Procedural and conceptual knowledge of expert and novice students for the solving of a basic problem in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 195–211.
Kortland, J. (1992). Environmental education: sustainable development and decision-making. In R. Yager (Ed.), The status of STS reform efforts around the world ICASE year book (pp. 32–39). Petersfield, UK: ICASE.
Kuhn, D. (2001). How do people know?. Psychological Science, 12(1), 1–8.
Kuhn, D., Black, J., Keseleman, A., & Kaplan, D. (2000). The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction,18(4), 495–523.
Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentive reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 287–315.
Mertens, T. R., & Hendrix, J. R. (1982). Responsible decision making: A tool for developing biological literacy. The American Biology Teacher, 44(3), 148–152.
National Research Council. (1996). National Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Puff, C. R. (1982). Handbook of research methods in human memory and cognition (pp. 246–250). New York: Academic Press.
Ramsey, J. (1993). The science education reform movement: Implications for social responsibility. Science Education, 77(2), 235–258.
Ratcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision-making about socio-scientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 167–182.
Rowland, P. M., & Adkins, C. R. (1992). Developing environmental decision-making in middle school classes. Paper presented at the meeting of the world congress for education and communication on environment and development, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (ED361168).
Sthahl, N. N., & Sthahl, R. J. (1995). Society and science: Decision making episodes for exploring society, science, and technology. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Vye, N. J., Goldman, S. R., Voss, J. F., Hmelo, C., & Williams, S. (1997). Complex mathematical problem solving by individuals and dyads. Cognition and Instruction, 15(4), 435–484.
Watson, F. (1980). Science education for survival. In C. P. McFadden (Ed.), World trends in science education. Halifax, Canada: Atlantic Institute of Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hong, JL., Chang, NK. Analysis of Korean High School Students' Decision-Making Processes in Solving a Problem Involving Biological Knowledge. Research in Science Education 34, 97–111 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000020884.52240.2d
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000020884.52240.2d