Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Korean High School Students' Decision-Making Processes in Solving a Problem Involving Biological Knowledge

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the cognitive characteristics of students' decision-making processes centered on phases, difficulties, and strategies are analysed in the personal dailylife context involving biological knowledge. The subjects were first year science and general high school students in Seoul, Korea; 6 female students and 7 male students. The students' decision-making processes were analysed by “think-aloud” and participant observation methods. On the whole, the students' decision-making processes progressed in following order: recognizing a problem, searching for alternatives, evaluating the alternatives, and decision. During the decision-making processes, the above phases were repeated by trial and error. Students preferred noncompensatory rules that did not allow trade offs among alternatives for decisions, rather than compensatory rules of selection. Students had a tendency to have difficulties in analysing the difference between initial state and desirable state of the problem, organising biological knowledge-related problems, and clarifying values as selective criteria. Even students who had high achievement and more positive science-related attitudes did not apply biological knowledge to search for alternatives, and could not utilise scientific values as selective criteria very well. We discuss the implications of these results for teaching of decision-making in respect to scientific literacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ableson, R. P., & Levi, A. (1985). Decision making and decision theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 231–309). New York: Ramdom House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1989). Decision-making theories as tools for interpreting student behavior during a scientific inquiry simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(3), 189–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1985). Collective decision making in the social context of science. Science Education, 69(4), 453–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1991). Logical reasoning in science and technology. Toronto, Canada: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J., Granato, L., Spranca, M., & Teubal, E. (1993). Decision-making biases in children and early adolescents: Exploratory studies. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(1), 22–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision process: A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 234–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyth-Marom, R., Fischoff, B., Jacobs Q. M., & Furby, L. (1991). Teaching decision-making to adolescents: A critical review. In J. Baron & R. Brown (Eds.), Teaching decision making to adolescents (pp. 19–59). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jager, H., & van der Loo, F. (1990). Decision making in environmental education: Notes from research in the Dutch nme-vo project. Journal of Environmental Education, 22(1), 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, A., & Jungwirth, E. (1980). A comparison of the "prompting effect" of out-of school with that of in-school contexts on certain aspects of critical thinking. European Journal of Science Education, 2(3), 301–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and Paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Verbal protocol analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, J. B. (1981). Test of science-related attitudes. Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullick, P., & Ratcliffe, M. (<nt>Eds.</nt>). (1996). Teaching ethical aspects of science. Southampton, UK: The Bassett Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How metal systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyworth, R., M. (1999). Procedural and conceptual knowledge of expert and novice students for the solving of a basic problem in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 195–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortland, J. (1992). Environmental education: sustainable development and decision-making. In R. Yager (Ed.), The status of STS reform efforts around the world ICASE year book (pp. 32–39). Petersfield, UK: ICASE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (2001). How do people know?. Psychological Science, 12(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., Black, J., Keseleman, A., & Kaplan, D. (2000). The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction,18(4), 495–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentive reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 287–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, T. R., & Hendrix, J. R. (1982). Responsible decision making: A tool for developing biological literacy. The American Biology Teacher, 44(3), 148–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puff, C. R. (1982). Handbook of research methods in human memory and cognition (pp. 246–250). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, J. (1993). The science education reform movement: Implications for social responsibility. Science Education, 77(2), 235–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision-making about socio-scientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, P. M., & Adkins, C. R. (1992). Developing environmental decision-making in middle school classes. Paper presented at the meeting of the world congress for education and communication on environment and development, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (ED361168).

  • Sthahl, N. N., & Sthahl, R. J. (1995). Society and science: Decision making episodes for exploring society, science, and technology. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vye, N. J., Goldman, S. R., Voss, J. F., Hmelo, C., & Williams, S. (1997). Complex mathematical problem solving by individuals and dyads. Cognition and Instruction, 15(4), 435–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, F. (1980). Science education for survival. In C. P. McFadden (Ed.), World trends in science education. Halifax, Canada: Atlantic Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hong, JL., Chang, NK. Analysis of Korean High School Students' Decision-Making Processes in Solving a Problem Involving Biological Knowledge. Research in Science Education 34, 97–111 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000020884.52240.2d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000020884.52240.2d

Navigation