Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Why Do Universities Compete in the Ratings Game? An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of the U.S. News and World Report College Rankings

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has concluded that an institution's ranking in the annual U.S. News and World Report “Best Colleges” issue impacts admission outcomes and pricing decisions at schools in the Consortium for Financing Higher Education. This article expands on the previous work by analyzing the effects of the U.S. News and World Report rankings across a broader range of universities and variables. The results show that many schools' admission outcomes are responsive to movements in the rankings; however changes in rank are more significant at certain locations in the rankings and affect public and private schools differently. The results also show that the socioeconomic and racial demographics of highly ranked universities may also be affected by changes in rank.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Avory, C., Fairbanks, A., and Zeckhauser, R. (2001). What worms for the early bird: Early admission at elite colleges. KSG Working Paper No. RWP01–049. Harvard University Kennedy School of Government Faculty Research Working Paper Series, Cambridge, MA.

  • Carmody, D. (1987, November 25). Colleges' SAT lists can be creative works. New York Times, p. E10.

  • Ehrenberg, D. G. (2000). Tuition Rising: Why College Costs so Much, Harvard University Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eide, E., Brewer, D. J., and Ehrenberg, D. G. (1998). Does it pay to attend an elite private college? Evidence on the effects of undergraduate college quality on graduate school attendance. Economics of Education Review 17(4): 371–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinier, L., and Strum, S. (2001). Who's Qualified?, Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., and Foley, E. M. (1995). Reducing the noise in the college choice process: The use of college guidebooks and ratings. In: Walleri, R. D., and Moss, M. K. (eds.), New Directions for Institutional Research No. 88: Evaluating and Responding to College Guidebooks and Rankings, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, B. (1995). College guidebooks: Background and development. In: Walleri, R. D., and Moss, M. K. (eds.), New Directions for Institutional Research No. 88: Evaluating and Responding to College Guidebooks and Rankings, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, A. (2002, February 26). Early admission to college is popular, but who benefits is under debate. Detroit News, p. A5.

  • Litten, L. H., and Hall, A. E. (1989). In the eyes of our beholders: Some evidence on how high school students and their parents view quality in colleges. Journal of Higher Education 60(3): 302–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, P. M., Antonio, A, L., Walpole, M. B., and Perez, L. X. (1998). College rankings: Democratized college knowledge for whom? Research in Higher Education 39(5): 513–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, M. D. (1995). Validity issues for reputational studies. In: Walleri, R. D., and Moss, M. K. (eds.), New Directions for Institutional Research No. 88: Evaluating and Responding to College Guidebooks and Rankings, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monks, J., and Ehrenberg, R. G. (1999). The impact of the US News and World Report college rankings on admission outcomes and pricing policies at selective private institutions. NBER Working Paper No. 7227, National Bureau of Economic Research., Cambridge, MA.

  • Nettles, M. T., Thoeny, A. R., and Gosman, E. J. (1986). Comparative and predictive analysis of black and white students' college achievement and experiences. Journal of Higher Education 57(3): 289–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, C. C. (1993). Assessing the validity of higher education indicators. Journal of Higher Education 64(5): 503–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stecklow, S. (1995, April 5). Cheat sheets: How colleges inflate ratings. Wall Street Journal, pp. A1, A8.

  • Stuart, D. L. (1995). Reputational rankings: Background and development. In: Walleri, R. D., and Moss, M. K. (eds.), New Directions for Institutional Research No. 88: Evaluating and Responding to College Guidebooks and Rankings, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toma, J. D., and Cross, M. E. (1998). Intercollegiate athletics and student college choice: Exploring the impact of championship seasons on undergraduate applications. Research in Higher Education 39(6): 633–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, D. S. (1992). Reputational rankings of colleges, universities, and individual disciplines and fields of study, from their beginnings to the present. In: Smart, J. C. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 8), Agathon Press, New York, pp. 234–304.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stanford University Graduate School of Business, 518 Memorial Way, Stanford, CA, 94305

    Marc Meredith

Authors
  1. Marc Meredith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Meredith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meredith, M. Why Do Universities Compete in the Ratings Game? An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of the U.S. News and World Report College Rankings. Research in Higher Education 45, 443–461 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RIHE.0000032324.46716.f4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RIHE.0000032324.46716.f4

Search

Navigation