Skip to main content
Log in

Implementing Outcomes Assessment in an Academic Affairs Support Unit

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While outcomes assessment has become a focus for institutions of higher education, assessment in academic support units remain sparse. Traditionally, assessment has been comprised of one-time student satisfaction surveys and/or supervisor evaluations tied specifically to job criteria. Although informative, these methods fail to account for or measure specific student learning outcomes completed by students via their interaction with faculty and staff. This article presents the development and implementation of a program of outcomes assessment at a 4-year public university in the northeast. Results indicate that students come to college with varying expectations of the role of academic advisors and range on a continuum of academic and social preparation to meet the demands of higher education. A majority of students are meeting the stated learning outcomes. Feedback from this assessment model is being used to improve the quality of services provided to successive cohorts of students at this institution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Banta, T. W., and Kuh, G. D. (1998). A missing link in assessment: Collaboration between academic and student affairs professionals. Change 30: 40-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, D. C. (2001). Assessing quality in higher education. Liberal Education 87: 40-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbridge, A. (1996). Academic advising—traditional or developmental approaches? Student perspectives. British Journal of Guidance & Counseling 24: 97-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A. F. (1992) Logistic regression analysis in higher education: An applied perspective. In: Smart, J. C. (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research(Vol. 10), Agathon Press, New York, pp. 225-255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claesson, M. A., and Brice, R. A. (1989). Teacher/mother: Effects of a dual role. American Educational Research Journal 26: 1-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Khawas, E. (1995). Higher education report no. 85, American Council on Education, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, V. N., and Habley, W. R. (2000). Academic Advising: A Comprehensive Handbook, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grites, T., and Gordon, V. N. (2000). Developmental academic advising revisited. NACADA Journal 20: 12-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessment and accountability. Educational Researcher 29: 4-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, C. L. (1998). Assessment of student learning. Liberal Education 84: 36-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maki, P. L. (2001). From standardized tests to alternative methods: Some current resources on method to assess learning in general education. Change 33: 28-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittler, M. L., and Bers, T. H. (1994). Qualitative assessment: An institutional reality check. New Directions for Community Colleges 22: 61-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. A., and Santiago, G. (2000). Accreditation and faculty working together. Academe 86: 30-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettles, M., Cole, J., and Sharp, S. (1998). The landscape: Tracking a subtle storm, assessment policies in higher education. Change 30: 47-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noel-Levitz (2000). College Student Inventory, Form A, USA Group Noel-Levitz, Inc., Iowa City, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomba, C. A., and Banta, T. W. (1999). Assessment Essentials: Planning, Implementing, and Improving Assessment in Higher Education, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T. (2001). Identifying excellence in undergraduate education: Are we even close? Change 33: 18-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. W., and Einarson, M. K. (2001). What are colleges doing about student assessment? Does it make a difference? Journal of Higher Education 72: 629-669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severy, L. J., Lee, N. L., Carodine, K., Powers, L., and Mason, G. R. (1994). Rating scales for the evaluation of academic advisors. NACADA Journal 14: 121-129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. D. (1993). General education assessment: Grappling with Godzilla. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Virginia Assessment Group, Richmond, VA.

  • Strahil, M. (1998). College Student Inventory, Noel-Levitz Centers, Inc., Iowa City, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahil, M. (2000). College Student Inventory–Form B, Noel-Levitz Centers, Inc., Iowa City, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terezini, P. T. (1989). Assessment with open eyes: Pitfalls in studying student outcomes. Journal of Higher Education 60: 644-664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upcraft, M. L., and Schuh, J. H. (1996). Assessment in Student Affairs: A Guide for Practitioners, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, J.S., Szelest, B.P. & Downey, J.P. Implementing Outcomes Assessment in an Academic Affairs Support Unit. Research in Higher Education 45, 405–427 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RIHE.0000027393.73499.a1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RIHE.0000027393.73499.a1

Navigation