Research in Higher Education

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 353–381 | Cite as

Ethnic and Gender Differences in Science Graduation at Selective Colleges with Implications for Admission Policy and College Choice



Using Bowen and Bok's data from 23 selective colleges, we fit multilevel logit models to test two hypotheses with implications for affirmative action and group differences in attainment of science, math, or engineering (SME) degrees. Hypothesis 1, that differences in precollege academic preparation will explain later SME graduation disparities, was fully supported with respect to the outcome gap between Whites and underrepresented minorities, partially supported for that between Asians and underrepresented minorities, and between men and women. Hypothesis 2, that college selectivity, after accounting for student characteristics, will be positively associated with SME persistence, was not supported. We demonstrate that the significance of the selectivity effect is overestimated when unilevel models are used. Admission officials are advised to carefully consider the relative academic preparedness of science-interested students, and such students choosing among colleges are advised to compare their academic qualifications to those of successful science students at each institution.

affirmative action college selectivity engineering gender mathematics minorities SAT science 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adair, R. K. (1991). Using quantitative measures to predict persistence in the natural sciences. College and University Fall: 73-79.Google Scholar
  2. Astin, A. W., and Astin, H. S. (1993). Undergraduate Science Education: The Impact of Different College Environments on the Educational Pipeline in the Sciences, Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  3. Barron's Educational Series, Inc. (2001). Profiles of American Colleges, Barron's Educational Series, Inc., Hauppauge, NY.Google Scholar
  4. Betz, N. E., and Hackett, J. (1983). The relationship of self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors. Journal of Vocational Behavior 23: 329-345.Google Scholar
  5. Bowen, W. G., and Bok, D. (1998). The Shape of the River: Long-Term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  6. Burstein, L. (1980). The analysis of multilevel data in educational research and evaluation. In: Berliner, D. C. (ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 8), American Education Research Association, Washington, DC, pp. 158-233.Google Scholar
  7. Buunk, B. P., and Ybema, J. F. (1997). Social comparisons and occupational stress: The identification-contrast model. In: Buunk, B. P., and Gibbons, F. X. (eds.), Health, Coping, and Well-Being: Perspectives from Social Comparison Theory, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 359-388.Google Scholar
  8. Chipman, S. F., and Thomas, V. G. (1987). The participation of women and minorities in mathematical, scientific, and technical fields. Review of Research in Higher Education 14: 387-430.Google Scholar
  9. Civian, J., and Schley, S. (1996, April). Pathways for women in the sciences II: Retention in math and science at the college level. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, J., and Cohen, P. (1975). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  11. Culotta, E., and Gibbons, A. (eds.). (1992). Minorities in science: Two generations of struggle [Special Report]. Science 258: 1176-1232.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, J. A. (1966). The campus as a frogpond: An application of the theory of relative deprivation to career decisions of college men. American Journal of Sociology 72: 17-31.Google Scholar
  13. DeBoer, G. E. (1986). Perceived science ability as a factor in the course selections of men and women in college. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 23: 343-352.Google Scholar
  14. Dunteman, G. H., Wisenbaker, J., and Taylor, M. E. (1979). Race and Sex Differences in College Science Program Participation (Report No. RT1-22U-1570), Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 199 034)Google Scholar
  15. Educational Testing Service (1989). 1989 National SAT Profiles, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  16. Elliott, R., Strenta, A. C., Adair, R., Matier, M., and Scott, J. (1995). Non-Asian minority students in the science pipeline at highly selective institutions. (Final report of NSF Grant RED 93 53 821).Google Scholar
  17. Ethington, C. A. (1997). A hierarchical linear modeling approach to studying college effects. In: Smart, J. C. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (vol. 12), Agathon, New York, pp. 165-194.Google Scholar
  18. Farmer, H. S., Wardrop, J. L., Anderson, M. Z., and Risinger, R. (1995). Women's career choices: Focus on science, math, and technology careers. Journal of Counseling Psychology 42: 155-170.Google Scholar
  19. Fullilove, R. E., and Treisman, P. U. (1990). Mathematics achievement among African American undergraduates at the University of California, Berkeley: An evaluation of the mathematics workshop program. Journal of Negro Education 59: 463-478.Google Scholar
  20. Green, K. C. (1989). A profile of undergraduates in the sciences. American Scientist 77: 475-480.Google Scholar
  21. Higher Education Research Institute (1989). Cooperative Institutional Research Program (CIRP) Freshman Questionnaire, UCLA, Higher Education Research Institute, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  22. Hilton, T. L., Hsia, J., Solorzano, D. G., and Benton, N. L. (1989). Persistence in Science of High Ability Minority Students, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  23. Hosmer, D. W., and Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied Logistic Regression, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Jackson, L. A., Gardner, P. D., and Sullivan, L. A. (1993). Engineering persistence: Past, present, and future factors and gender differences. Higher Education 26: 227-246.Google Scholar
  25. Jacobs, J. E., and Wigfield, A. (1989). Sex equity in mathematics and science education: Research-policy links. Educational Psychology Review 1: 39-56.Google Scholar
  26. Jagacinski, C. M., LeBold, W. K., and Salvendy, G. (1988). Gender differences in persistence in computer-related fields. Journal of Educational Computing Research 4: 185-202.Google Scholar
  27. Kelley, H. H. (1952). Two functions of reference groups. In: Swanson, G. E., Newcomb, T. M., and Hartley, E. (eds.), Readings in Social Psychology, Henry Holt, New York, pp. 410-414.Google Scholar
  28. Lee, V. E. (1987). Identifying Potential Scientists and Engineers: An Analysis of the High School-College Transition, Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  29. Leslie, L., and Oaxaca, R. (1998). Women and minorities in higher education. In: Smart, J. C. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (vol. 13), Agathon, New York, pp. 304-352.Google Scholar
  30. Leslie, L., McClure, G. T., and Oaxaca, R. (1998). Women and minorities in science and engineering: A life sequence analysis. Journal of Higher Education 69: 239-276.Google Scholar
  31. Levin, J., and Wyckoff, J. H. (1995). Predictors of persistence and success in an engineering program. NACADA Journal 15: 15-21.Google Scholar
  32. Little, R. J. A., and Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Marsh, H. W., Kong, C., and Hau, K. (2000). Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: Counterbalancing contrast and reflected-glory effects in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78: 337-349.Google Scholar
  34. McCullagh, P., and Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized Linear Models (2nd ed.), Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Meece, J. L., Parsons, J. E., Kaczala, C. M., Goff, S. R., and Futterman, R. (1982). Sex differences in math achievement: Toward a model of academic choice. Psychological Bulletin 91: 324-348.Google Scholar
  36. Nakao, K., and Treas, J. (1990). Computing 1989 Occupational Prestige Scores (General Social Survey Methodological Report no. 70), National Opinion Research Center, Chicago.Google Scholar
  37. National Academy of Sciences (1987). Nurturing Science and Engineering Talent: A Discussion Paper, The Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  38. National Science Board (2002). Science and Engineering Indicators—2002 (NSB 02-01) [On-line], National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA. Available: Scholar
  39. National Science Foundation (1992). Blacks in Undergraduate Science and Engineering Education, National Science Foundation, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  40. National Science Foundation (1999). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering (NSF Report No. 99-338), National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
  41. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., and Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83: 44-59.Google Scholar
  42. Oakes, J. (1990). Lost Talent: The Underparticipation of Women, Minorities, and Disabled Persons in Science, Rand, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
  43. Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How College Affects Students, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  44. Post, P., Stewart, M. A., and Smith, P. L. (1991). Self-efficacy, interest, and consideration of math/science and non-math/science occupations among black freshmen. Journal of Vocational Behavior 38: 179-186.Google Scholar
  45. Ramist, L., Lewis, C., and McCamley-Jenkins, L. (1994). Student Group Differences in Predicting College Grades: Sex, Language, and Ethnic Groups (College Board Report No. 93-1), College Entrance Examination Board, New York.Google Scholar
  46. Raudenbush, S. W., and Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, Second Edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  47. Schoenberger, A. K. (1988, April). College women's persistence in engineering and physical science: A further study. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  48. Schulman, J. L., and Bowen, W. G. (2001). The game of life: College sports and educational values. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  50. Simpson, J. C. (2001). Segregated by subject: racial differences in the factors influencing academic major between European Americans, Asian Americans, and African, Hispanic, and Native Americans. Journal of Higher Education 72: 63-100.Google Scholar
  51. Snijders, R. A. B., and Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling, Sage Publications Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  52. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., and Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35: 4-28.Google Scholar
  53. Strenta, A. C., Elliott, R., Adair, R., Matier, M., and Scott, J. (1994). Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions. Research in Higher Education 35: 513-547.Google Scholar
  54. Tobias, S. (1990). They're Not Dumb, They're Different: Stalking the Second Tier. Research Corporation, Tucson, AZ.Google Scholar
  55. Toutkoushian, R. K., and Smart, J. C. (2001). Do institutional characteristics affect student gains from college? Review of Higher Education 25: 39-61.Google Scholar
  56. Turner, S. E., and Bowen, W. G. (1999). Choice of major: The changing (unchanging) gender gap. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 52: 289-313.Google Scholar
  57. Ware, N., and Lee, V. (1988). Sex differences in choice of college science majors. American Educational Research Journal 25: 593-614.Google Scholar
  58. Ware, N. C., Steckler, N. A., and Leserman, J. (1985). Undergraduate women: Who chooses a science major? Journal of Higher Education 56: 73-84.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesville
  2. 2.University of VirginiaUSA

Personalised recommendations