Skip to main content
Log in

What Satisfies Students? Mining Student-Opinion Data with Regression and Decision Tree Analysis

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate how students' characteristics and experiences affect satisfaction, this study uses regression and decision tree analysis with the CHAID algorithm to analyze student-opinion data. A data mining approach identifies the specific aspects of students' university experience that most influence three measures of general satisfaction. The three measures have different predictors and cannot be used interchangeably. Academic experiences are influential. In particular, faculty preparedness, which has a well-known relationship to student achievement, emerges as a principal determinant of satisfaction. Social integration and pre-enrollment opinions are also important. Campus services and facilities have limited effects, and students' demographic characteristics are not significant predictors. Decision tree analysis reveals that social integration has more effect on the satisfaction of students who are less academically engaged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • ACT, Inc. (2000). SUNY Student Opinion Survey, ACT, Inc., Iowa City, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, N. D. (1982). College student performance, satisfaction and retention: Specification and estimate of a structural model. Journal of Higher Education 53(1): 32-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1993). What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A., Korn, W., and Green, K. (1987). Retaining and satisfying students. Educational Record 68(1): 36-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. P., and Bradley, R. K. (1986). Untangling the satisfaction-performance relationship for college students. Journal of Higher Education 57(4): 393-412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltyukova, S. A., and Fox, C. M. (2002). Student satisfaction as a measure of student development: Towards a universal metric. Journal of College Student Development 43(2): 161-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, M. (1994). The quality of student life: Toward a coherent conceptualization. Social Indicators Research 31(3): 205-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, M., and Hollings, A. (1997). Student satisfaction: Test of an ecological model. Journal of College Student Development 38(3): 213-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borden, V. M. H. (1995). Segmenting student markets with a student satisfaction and priorities survey. Research in Higher Education 36: 73-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P. (1981). Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Higher Education 51(3): 281-309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, N. R., and Smith, H. (1981). Applied Regression Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endo, J. J., and Harpel, R. L. (1982). The effect of student–faculty interaction on students' educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education 16: 115-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. (1989). The association between student ratings of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement: Refining and extending the synthesis of data from multisection validity studies. Research in Higher Education 30: 583-645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. (1994). Identifying exemplary teaching: Evidence from course and teacher evaluations. Paper commissioned by the National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment. Stony Brook, New York: State University of New York at Stony Brook.

  • Hand, D. J. (1999). Statistics and data mining: Intersecting disciplines. SIGKDD Explorations 1(1): 16-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, L., Kryter, K., Prus, J. S., and Fitzgerald, V. (1992). Predicting college student satisfaction, commitment, and attrition from investment model constructs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22(16): 1273-1296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J. C. (1985). Determinants of college students' overall evaluations of their academic programs. Research in Higher Education 23: 413-437.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J. D. (1999). The effects of entering characteristics and instructional experiences on student satisfaction and degree completion: An application of the input-environment-outcome assessment model. International Journal of Instructional Media 26(4): 423-434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, W. E., Lindsay, P., and Kolb, M. N. (1992). Higher education, college characteristics and student experiences: Long-term effects on educational satisfactions and perceptions. Journal of Higher Education 63(3): 303-328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville, P. G. (1999). Decisions trees for predictive modeling. SAS Technical Report, The SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T. (1980). Student–faculty informal contact and college outcomes. Review of Educational Research 50(4): 545-595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., Edison, M., Nora, A., Hagedorn, L. S., and Braxton, J. (1996). Effects of teacher organization/preparation and teacher skill/clarity on general cognitive skills in college. Journal of College Student Development 37(1): 7-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E., and Terenzini, P. T. (1979). Interaction effects in Spady's and Tinto's Conceptual Models of College Dropout. Sociology of Education 52(4): 197-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pate, W. S., Jr. (1993). Consumer satisfaction, determinants, and post-purchase actions in higher education: A model to guide academic managers. College and University 68(2): 100-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R. (1991). The effects of background, coursework and involvement on students' grades and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education 32: 15-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R. (1993). The relationship between perceived learning and satisfaction with college: An alternative view. Research in Higher Education 34: 23-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, J. G., et al. (1984). Development of the college descriptive index: A measure of student satisfaction. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 15(2): 67-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, L., and Burton, J. D. (1996). From retention to satisfaction: New outcomes for assessing the freshman experience. Research in Higher Education 37: 555-567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, L., and Chan, S. (1996). Student satisfaction surveys: Measurement and utilization issues. AIR Professional File, 59.

  • Snedecor, G. W., and Cochran, W. G. (1989). Statistical Methods, Iowa State University Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS, Inc. (1998). AnswerTree 2.0: User's Guide, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terenzini, P. T., and Pascarella, E. T. (1980). Student/faculty relationships and freshman year educational outcomes: A further investigation. Journal of College Student Personnel 21(6): 521-528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terenzini, P. T., and Pascarella, E. T. (1991). Twenty years of research on college students: Lessons for future research. Research in Higher Education 32: 83-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research 45: 89-125.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, E.H., Galambos, N. What Satisfies Students? Mining Student-Opinion Data with Regression and Decision Tree Analysis. Research in Higher Education 45, 251–269 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RIHE.0000019589.79439.6e

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RIHE.0000019589.79439.6e

Navigation