Skip to main content
Log in

Response to Paul Hewett's “Comments Relating to Tornero-Velez et al.: Compliance Versus Risk in Assessing Occupational Exposures”

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Risk Analysis

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. P. Hewett, “Letter to the editor.” Risk Anal. 18, pp. xxx-xxx.

  2. R. Tornero-Velez, E. Symanski, H. Kromhout, R. C. Yu, S. M. and Rappaport, “Compliance Versus Risk in Assessing Occupational exposures.” Risk Anal. 17, 279–292 (1997).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. S. M. Rappaport, R. Lyles, and L. L. Kupper, “An Exposure-Assessment Strategy Accounting For Within-and Between-Worker Sources of Variability.” Ann. Occup. Hyg. 39, 469–495 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Lyles, L. L. Kupper, and S. M. Rappaport, “A Lognormal Distribution-Based Exposure Assessment Method for Unbalanced Data.” Ann. Occup. Hyg. 41, 63–76 (1997).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Hewett, “Letter to the editor.” Ann. Occup. Hyg. 42, 413–417 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Hewett, “Letter to the editor.” Ann. Occup. Hyg. 42, 421 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. M. Rappaport, L. L. Kupper, and R. Lyles, “Letter to the editor.” Ann. Occup. Hyg. 42, 417–420 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. M. Rappaport, L. L. Kupper, and R. Lyles, “Letter to the editor.” Ann. Occup. Hyg. 42, 422 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. M. Rappaport, “Assessment of Long-Term Exposures to Toxic Substances in Air.” Ann. Occup. Hyg. 35, 61–121 (1991).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Hattis, “Pharmacokinetic Principles for Dose-Rate Extrapolation of Carcinogenic Risk from Genetically Active Agents.” Risk Anal. 18, 303–316 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rappaport, S. M. (1993b) “Biological Considerations in Assessing Exposures to Genotoxic and Carcinogenic Agents.” Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 65, S29-S35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. T. J. Smith. “Exposure Assessment for Occupational Epidemiology.” Am. J. Ind. Med. 12, 249–268 (1987).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. T. J. Smith. “Occupational Exposure and Dose Over Time: Limitations of Cumulative Exposure.” Am. J. Ind. Med. 21, 35–51 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Checkoway and C. H. Rice. “Time-Weighted Averages, Peaks, and Other Indices of Exposure in Occupational Epidemiology.” Am. J. Ind. Med. 21, 25–33 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. R. E. G. Rendall, J. I. Phillips, and K. A. Renton, “Death Following Exposure to Fine Particulate Nickel from a Metal Arc Process.” Ann. Occup. Hyg. 38, 921–930 (1994).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. S. M. Rappaport, R. Tornero-Velez, and P. Egeghy, “Letter to the editor.” Appl. Occ. Environ. Hyg. 13, 202–203 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Hewett, “Mean testing: II. Comparison of Several Alternative Procedures.” Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 12, 347–355 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  18. U. Ulfvarson. “Limitations to the Use of Employee Exposure Data on Air Contaminants in Epidemiologic Studies.” Int. Arch. Environ. Health 52, 285–300 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Vermeulen, H. Kromhout, and P. Rocchi, “How practical is NEN 689?” Arbeidsomstandigheden, 05–98, 10–15 (1998) (in Dutch).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rappaport, S.M., Tornero-Velez, R., Symanski, E. et al. Response to Paul Hewett's “Comments Relating to Tornero-Velez et al.: Compliance Versus Risk in Assessing Occupational Exposures”. Risk Anal 18, 669–671 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RIAN.0000006253.17662.66

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RIAN.0000006253.17662.66

Keywords

Navigation