Advertisement

Risk Analysis

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 575–584 | Cite as

Retrospective Temporal and Spatial Mobility of Adult Iowa Women

  • R. William Field
  • Brian J. Smith
  • Christine P. Brus
  • Charles F. Lynch
  • John S. Neuberger
  • Daniel J. Steck
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Human exposure assessments require a linkage between toxicant concentrations in occupied spaces and the receptor's mobility pattern. Databases reporting distinct populations' mobility in various parts of the home, time outside the home, and time in another building are scarce. Temporal longitudinal trends in these mobility patterns for specific age and gender groups are nonexistent. This paper describes subgroup trends in the spatial and temporal mobility patterns within the home, outside the home, and in another building for 619 Iowa females that occupied the same home for at least 20 years. The study found that the mean time spent at home for the participants ranged from a low of 69.4% for the 50–59 year age group to a high of 81.6% for the over 80-year-old age group. Participants who lived in either one- or two- story homes with basements spent the majority of their residential occupancy on the first story. Trends across age varied for other subgroups by number of children, education, and urban/rural status. Since all of these trends were nonlinear, they indicate that error exists when assuming a constant, such as a 75% home occupancy factor, which has been advocated by some researchers and agencies. In addition, while aggregate data, such as presented in this report, are more helpful in deriving risk estimates for population subgroups, they cannot supplant good individual-level data for determining risks.

Spatial mobility temporal mobility activity patterns time homes Iowa 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Research and Development, Analysis of the National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS) Respondents from a Standpoint of Exposure Assessment, Washington, D.C., EPA/600/R-96/074 (1996).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. S. Liu, Y. L. Chang, S. B. Hayward, A. J. Gadgil, and A. V. Nero, “The Distribution of Lifetime Cumulative Exposures to Radon for California Residents,” J. Exp. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 3(2), 165–179 (1993).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. S. Liu, S. B. Hayward, G. Kulasingam, B. Chang, and K. Sexton, Estimation of Formaldehyde Exposure for Mobile Home Residences, Proceedings of the 79th Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control Association, Minneapolis, MN, June 1986, Air and Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, PA (1986).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. L. Jenkins, T. J. Phillips, and E. J. Mulberg, and S. P. Hui, “Activity Patterns of California's: Use of and Proximity to Indoor Pollutant Sources,” Atm. Environ. 26A(12), 2141–2148 (1992).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. L. Jenkins, T. J. Phillips, and E. J. Mulberg, Activity Patterns of Californians, Use of and Proximity to Indoor Pollutant Sources, Indoor Air '90: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Toronto (1990).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. A. Francis, Patterns of Building Occupancy for the General Public, NRPB-M-129, National Radiation Protection Board (1987).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Sexton, K. S. Liu, and M. X. Petreas, “Formaldehyde Concentrations Inside Private Residences: A Mail-Out Approach to Indoor Air Monitoring,” JAPCA 36(6), 698–704 (1986).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Exposure Factors Handbook, Washington, D.C., EPA/600/8–89/043 (1989).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. W. Moeller and D. W. Underhill, Final Report on the Study of the Effects of Building Materials on Population Dose Equivalent, School of Public Health, Harvard University (1976).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. T. Oakley, Natural Radiation Exposure in the United States, ORP/SID 72–1, USEPA (1976).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. W. Field, D. J. Steck, C. F. Lynch, C. P. Brus, J. S. Neuberger, and B. C. Kross, “Residential Radon-222 Exposure and Lung Cancer: Exposure Assessment Methodology,” J. Exp. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 6(2), 181–195 (1996).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. P. Brus, B. C. Kross, and C. F. Lynch, The Forgotten Side of the Exposure Model: Use of Autobiographical Memory in Retrieval of Personal Mobility Patterns, Proceedings of The 1993 International Radon Conference, American Association of Radon Scientists and Technologists, Denver, CO (1993).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. P. Brus, The Forgotten Side of the Exposure Model: Use of Autobiographical Memory in Retrieval of Personal Mobility Data, MS thesis, University of Iowa (1994).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. J. Hastie, and R. J. Tibshirani, Generalized Additive Models (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1990).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    SAS Institute Inc., SAS® Technical Report P-229, SAS/STAT® Software: Changes and Enhancements, Release 6.07, Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc. (1992), pp. 287–366.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. C. Nelson, Personal Communication, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, July 24 (1997).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. M. Kildea, Jr., and T. C. Lee, “Radon Plateout on Synthetic Fibers as a Possible Risk Factor for Breast Cancer” (letter), Risk Anal. 16(1), 1–2 (1996).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. S. Neuberger and R. W. Field, “Radon and Breast Cancer” (letter), Risk Anal. 16(6), 729–730 (1996).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Risk Analysis 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. William Field
    • 1
  • Brian J. Smith
    • 1
  • Christine P. Brus
    • 1
  • Charles F. Lynch
    • 1
  • John S. Neuberger
    • 1
  • Daniel J. Steck
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Preventive Medicine and Environmental Health, College of MedicineUniversity of IowaIowa City
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsSt. John's UniversityCollegeville

Personalised recommendations