Skip to main content
Log in

Biofilms and Biocides: Are there Implications for Antibiotic Resistance?

  • Published:
Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considerable controversy surrounds the use of biocides in an ever increasing range of consumer products and the possibility that their indiscriminate use might reduce biocide effectiveness and alter susceptibilities towards antibiotics. These concerns have been based largely on the isolation of resistant mutants from in vitro monoculture experiments. To date, however the emergence of biocide-resistant strains in-vivo has not been reported and a number of environmental survey studies have failed to associate biocide use with antibiotic resistance. This article gives an overview of the issues as they currently stand and reviews data generated in our laboratory over the last five years where we have used laboratory microcosms of the environment and oral cavity to better understand the possible effects of real-life biocide exposure of these high risk ecosystems. In general, whilst biocide susceptibility changes can be demonstrated in pure culture, especially for E. coli towards triclosan, it has not been possible to reproduce these effects during chronic, sublethal dosing of complex communities. We conclude from this review that whilst the incorporation of antibacterial agents into a widening sphere of personal products may not overtly impact on the patterns of microbial susceptibility observed in the environment, the precautionary principle suggests that the use of biocides should be limited to applications where clear hygienic benefits can be demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison DG, McBain AJ & Gilbert P (2000) Microbial Biofilms: Problems of control. In: Allison DG, Gilbert P, Lappin-Scott H & Wilson M (Eds), Community Structure and Cooperation in Biofilms (pp 309–327). Cambridge University Press

  • Barnett M, Bushby SRM & Mitcheson DA (1953) Tubercle bacilli resistant to isoniazid:Virulence and response to treatment with isoniazid in guinea pigs and mice. British J. Exp. Pathol. 34: 568–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman JS (1998) Characterising bacterial resistance to preservatives and disinfectants. Int.Biodet.Biodeg. 41: 241–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuanchuen R, Beinlich K, Hoang TT, Becher A, Karkhoff-Schweizer RR & Schweizer HP (2001) Cross-resistance between triclosan and antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is mediated by multi-drug effux pumps: Exposure of a susceptible mutant strain to triclosan selects nfxB mutants overexpressing MexCD-OprJ. Antimicrob.Agents Chemother. 45: 432–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole EC, Addison RM, Rubino JR, Leese KE, Dulaney PD, Newell MS, Wilkins J, Gaber DJ, Wineinger T, Criger DA (2003) Investigation of antibiotic and antibacterial agent cross-resistance in target bacteria from homes of antibacterial product users and nonusers. J. Appl. Microbiol. 95: 664–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cookson BD, Farrelly H, Stapleton P, Garvey RPJ & Price MR (1991) Transferable resistance to triclosan in MRSA. British Med. J. 337: 1548–1549

    Google Scholar 

  • Furia TE & Schenkel AG (1968) A new, broad spectrum bacteriostat. Soap Chem. Specialities 44: 47–50 and 116 –122

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert P & McBain AJ (2003) An evaluation of the potential impact of the increased use of biocides within consumer products upon the prevalence of antibiotic resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16: 189–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie SH (2001) Antibiotic resistance in the absence of selective pressure. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 17: 171–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjermo P & Eriksen HM (1974) Unchanged plaque inhibiting effect of chlorhexidine in human subjects after two years of continuous use. Arch.Oral.Biol. 19: 317–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Heasman PA, Heasman L, Stacey F & McCracken GI (2001) Local delivery of chlorhexidine gluconate (PerioChip)in periodontal maintenance patients. J.Clin.Periodontol. 28: 90–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath RI & Rock CO (1995) Enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase (FabI)plays a determinant role in completing cycles of fatty-acid elongation in Escherichia coli. J.Biol. Chem. 270: 26538–26542

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath RJ, Roland GE & Rock CO (2000) Inhibition of the Staphylococcus aureus NADPH-dependant enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase by triclosan and hexachlorophene. J.Biol. Chem. 275: 4654–2659

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones CL, Ritchie JA, Marsh PD & Van der Ouderaa F (1988) The effect of long-term use of a dentifrice containing zinc citrate and a non-ionic agent on the oral flora. J. Dent. Res. 67: 46–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenski RE, Simpson SC & Nguyen TT (1994) Genetic analysis of a plasmid-encoded, host genotype-speci c enhancement of bacterial tness. J. Bacteriol. 176: 3140–3147

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy SB (2000) Antibiotic and antiseptic resistance:Impact on public health. Pediatric Infect. Dis. J. 19: S120–S122

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy CW, Roujeinikova A, Sedelnikova S, Baker PJ, Stuitje AR, Slabas AR, Rice DW & Rafferty JB (1999) Molecular basis of triclosan activity. Nature 398: 383–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindhe J, Rosling B, Socransky SS & Volpe AR (1993) The effect of a triclosan-containing dentifrice on established plaque and gingivitis. J. Clin. Periodontol. 20: 327–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh PD (1992) Microbiological aspects of the chemical control of plaque and gingivitis. J. Dent. Res. 71: 1431–1438

    Google Scholar 

  • McBain AJ & Gilbert P (2001) Biocide tolerance and the harbingers of doom. Int. Biodet. Biodeg. 47: 55–61

    Google Scholar 

  • McBain AJ & Macfarlane GT (1998) Ecological and physiological studies on large intestinal bacteria in relation to production of hydrolytic and reductive enzymes involved in formation of genotoxic metabolites. J. Med. Microbiol. 47: 407–416

    Google Scholar 

  • McBain AJ & Macfarlane GT (2001) Modulation of genotoxic enzyme activities by non-digestible oligosaccharide metabolism in in-vitro human gut bacterial ecosystems. J. Med. Microbiol. 50: 832–841

    Google Scholar 

  • McBain AJ, Allison DG & Gilbert P (2000) Emerging strategies for the chemical treatment of microbial biofilms. Biotechnol. Genetic Eng. Rev. 17: 267–279

    Google Scholar 

  • McBain AJ, Bartolo RG, Catrenich CE, Charbonneau D, Ledder RG & Gilbert P (2003a) Exposure of sink-drain microcosms to triclosan:Population dynamics and antimicrobial susceptibility. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 5433–5442

    Google Scholar 

  • McBain AJ, Bartolo RG, Catrenich CE, Charbonneau D, Ledder RG, Rickard AH, Symmons SA & Gilbert P (2003b) Microbial characterization of bio lm in domestic drains and the establishment of stable biofilm microcosms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 177–185

    Google Scholar 

  • McBain AJ, Bartolo RG, Catrenich CE, Charbonneau D, Ledder RG & Gilbert P (2003c) Effects of triclosan-containing dentifrice upon the dynamics and antimicrobial susceptibility of in-vitro plaque ecosystems. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3531–3538

    Google Scholar 

  • McBain AJ, Bartolo RG, Catrenich CE, Charbonneau D, Ledder RG & Gilbert P (2003d) Effects of chlorhexidine gluconate-containing mouthwash upon the vitality and antimicrobial susceptibility of in-vitro oral ecosystems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 4770–4776

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell G & Russell AD (1999) Antiseptics and disinfectants: Activity, action, and resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12: 147–179

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurry LM, Oethinger M & Levy SB (1998a) Triclosan targets lipid synthesis. Nature 394: 531–532

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurry LM, Oethunger M & Levy SB (1998b) Over expression of MarA, SoxS, or AcrAB produces resistance to triclosan in laboratory and clinical strains of Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 166: 305–309

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurry LM, McDermott PF & Levy SB (1999) Genetic evidence that InhA of Mycobacterium smegmatis is a target for triclosan. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43: 711–713

    Google Scholar 

  • Miesel L, Rozwarski DA, Sacchettini JC & Jacob WR (1998) Mechanisms for isoniazid action and resistance. Novartis foundation Symposium 217: 209–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Regos J & Hitz HR (1974) Investigations on the mode of action of triclosan,a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent. Zentral Blatt Für Bakteriologie und Hygiene Abteilung 1 Original A 226, 390–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds MG (2000) Compensatory evolution in rifampinresistant Escherichia coli. Genetics 156: 1471–1581

    Google Scholar 

  • Roujeinikova A, Sedelnikova S, deBoer GJ, Stuitje AR, Rafferty JB & Rice DW (1999) Inhibitor biding studies on enoyl reductase reveal changes related to substrate recognition. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 30811–30817

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell AD (1997) Plasmids and bacterial resistance to biocides. J. Appl. Microbiol. 82: 155–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrag S & Perrot V (1996) Reducing antibiotic resistance. Nature 382: 120–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Suller MTE & Russell AD (1999) Antibiotic and biocide resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancymycin-resistant enterococcus. J. Hospital Infect. 43: 281–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh TF, Glenwright HD & Hull PS (1992) Clinical effects of pulsed oral irrigation with 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate in patients with adult periodontitis. J.Clin.Periodontol. 19: 245–248

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McBain, A., Gilbert, P. & Allison, D. Biofilms and Biocides: Are there Implications for Antibiotic Resistance?. Re/Views in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 2, 141–146 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RESB.0000040460.59517.5c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RESB.0000040460.59517.5c

Navigation