Skip to main content
Log in

Electronic sensory systems for taste and odour monitoring in water – Developments and limitations

  • Published:
Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taste and odour causingchemicals in drinking water supplies can bedetected and identified using a variety ofanalytical techniques and sensory methods.Currently limitations exist in applying thesetechniques and methods to the continuousmonitoring of taste and odour episodes.Electronic sensory systems so called``electronic noses'' using non-specific gassensors could offer a rapid and relative simpletechnique for continuous monitoring of waterquality. Laboratory and field-based continuouswater monitoring showed that introducedpollutants such as 2-chlorophenol and geosmincould be detected by a sensor array, howeverthe detection limits were significant higherthan the odour threshold concentrations (OTC)for the respective compounds. The conditioningof the monitoring system in a temperaturecontrolled environment for on-line headspacegeneration and transfer reduced the impact ofenvironmental fluctuations on the sensorresponse profiles. At present, a sensor arraybased monitoring system could be applied to theintake protection of taste and odour causingcompounds in water supplies with a minimum OTCof 10 ppm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bourgeois W & Stuetz RM (2000) Measuring wastewater quality using a sensor array-prospects for real-time monitoring. Water Sci. Technol. 41(12): 107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois W & Stuetz RM (2002) Use of a chemical sensor array for detecting industrial pollutants in wastewater. Water Res. 36: 4505–4512

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois W, Hogben P, Pike A & Stuetz RM (2003) Development of sensor array based measurement system for continuous monitoring of water and wastewater. Sensors and Actuators B 88: 312–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Drage BE, Upton JE & Purvis M (1998) On-line monitoring of micropollutants in the river trent (UK) with respect to drinking water abstraction. Water Sci Technol 38(11): 123–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewettinck T, Van Hege K & Verstraete W (2001) The electronic nose as a rapid sensor for volatile compounds in treated domestic wastewater. Water Res. 35(10): 2475–2483

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner JW & Barlett PN (1999) Electronic Noses-Principles and Applications. Oxford University Press, 223 pp.

  • Gardner JW, Craven M, Dow C & Hines EL (1998) The prediction of bacteria type and culture growth phase by an electronic nose with a multi-layer perceptron network. Meas. Sci. Technol. 9: 120–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson TD, Prosser O, Hulbert JN, Marshall RW, Corcoran P, Lowery P, Ruck-Keene EA & Heron S (1997) Detection and simultaneous identification of microorganisms from headspace samples using electronic noses. Sensors Actuators B 44: 413–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs PJ, Misselbrook TH & Pain BF (1995) Assessment of odours from livestock wastes by a photoionization detector, an electronic noses, olfactometry and gas-chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Engng. Res. 60: 137–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg M, Gustafsson F, Hornsten EG, Winquist F, Nilsson LE, Ljung L & Lundstrom I (1998) Bacteria classification based on feature extraction from sensor data. Biotechnol. Technq. 12: 319–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben P, Stuetz RM & Drage B (2001) Use of chemical sensor array and an on-line flow-cell for monitoring water quality. Proc.AWWA Water Quality Technology Conference. Nashville, 9 pp-CD

  • Khiari D, Brenner L, Burlingame GA & Suffet IH (1992) Sensory gas chromatography for evaluation of taste and odor events in drinking water. Wat. Sci. Technol. 25(2): 97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress-Rogers E (1996) Handbook of Biosensors and Electronic Noses. CRC Press, Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maricou H, Pereira D, Verschuere S, Philips S & Verstraete W (1998) Measurements of some volatile compounds by means of the electronic nose. Water Air Soil Pollut. 107: 423–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Misselbrook TH, Hobbs PJ & Persaud KC (1997) Use of an electronic nose to measure odour concentrations following application of cattle slurry to glassland. J. Agric. Engng Res. 66: 213–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Namdev PK, Alroy Y and Singh V (1998) Sniffing out trouble: use of an electronic nose in bioprocesses. Biotechnology Progress 14: 75–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Persaud KC, Khaffaf SM, Sneath RW & Hobbs PJ (1996) Assessment of conducting polymer odour sensors for agricultural malodours measurements. Chem. Sci. 21: 495–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuetz RM, White M & Fenner RA (1998) Use of an lectronic nose to detect tainting compounds in raw and treated water. J Water SRT-Aqua 47(5): 223–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuetz RM, Fenner RA & Engin G (1999a) Characterisation of wastewater using an electronic nose. Water Res. 33(2): 442–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuetz RM, Fenner RA & Engin G (1999b) Assessment of odours from sewage treatment works by an electronic nose, H2S analysis and olfactometry. Water Res. 33(2): 453–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuetz RM (2003) Application of electronic nose technology for monitoring water and wastewater. In: Alegret S (Ed) Integrated Analytical Systems (pp 513–539). Elsevier Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry Series

  • Suffet IH, Khiari D & Bruchet A (1999) The drinking water taste and odor wheel for the millennium: beyond geosmin and methylisoborneol. Wat Sci. Technol. 40(6): 1–13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hogben, P., Drage, B. & Stuetz, R. Electronic sensory systems for taste and odour monitoring in water – Developments and limitations. Re/Views in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 3, 15–22 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RESB.0000040013.76464.58

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RESB.0000040013.76464.58

Navigation