Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Differentiation Among US Colleges and Universities

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Colleges and universities in the US differ markedly in their access to economic resources. National data are used here to describe the resulting hierarchy that's reflected in schools' spending on their students, the prices those students pay, and the subsidies they get in consequence. Both historical data and projections based on recent institutional saving suggest that economic disparities among institutions and their students are increasing. In a final section, the paper asks what to make of this: what we can say about “the right degree” of institutional disparity – whether we have too much, too little, or about the right amount of differentiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apple, R. W. Jr. (1998) 'Berea Journal: A College of Few Parties And Fewer Complaints', The New York Times, p. 20.

  • Bowen, Howard R. (1980) The Costs of Higher Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, Charles T. (1996) Buying the Best: Cost Escalation in Elite Higher Education. A National Bureau of Economic Research Monograph. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, Stacy B., and Alan B. Kruger (1999) 'Estimating the Payoff to Attending a More Selective College: An application of selection on observables and unobservables', NBER Working Paper 7322.

  • Dworkin, Ronald (2000). Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellwood, D avid T., and Thomas J. Kane (1999) 'Who Is Getting A College Education? Family Background and the Growing Gap in Enrollment', in a paper written for the Macalester Forum on Higher Education Conference, sponsored by Macalester College.

  • Frank, Robert H. (1999) 'Winner Take-All...Even in Higher Education, in Forum for the Future of Higher Education', < Aspen, CO.

  • Frank, Robert. H. (2001). 'Higher Education: The Ultimate Winner-Take-All Market?', in M. E. Devlin, and Joel W. Meyerson, Forum Futures: Exploring the Future of Higher Education 2000 Papers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc., pp. 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Robert H. and Phillip J. Cook (1996) The Winner-Take-All Society. New York, NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. (1999) 'Doing it Right: Job Training and Education', Public Interest, pp. 86–106.

  • Hill, C.B., Winston, G.C., and Boyd, S. (2004) 'Affordability: Family Incomes and Net Prices At Highly Selective Private Colleges and Universities', The Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education, Discussion Paper 66r.

  • Hoxby, Caroline M. and Bridget Terry Long (1999) 'Explaining Rising Income and Wage Inequality Among the College Educated', in a paper written for the Macalester Forum on Higher Education Conference, sponsored by Macalester College.

  • Ikenberry, Stanley O., and Terry W. Hartle (1998) Too Little Knowledge is a Dangerous Thing: What the Public Thinks it Knows about Paying for College. Washington DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemann, Nicholas (1999a) The Big Test: The Secret History of the American Meritocracy. New York, NY: Ferrar, Straus & Giroux, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemann, Nicholas (1999b) 'The Kids in the Conference Room: How McKinsey & Company Became the Next Big Step', The New Yorker, pp. 209–216.

  • Manski, Charles F. and David A. Wise (1983) College Choice in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, A. C., ed. (2001) The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Menlo Park, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

  • McPherson, Michael S., and Morton Owen Schapiro (1994) 'Merit Aid: Students, Institutions, and Society', The Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education, Discussion Paper No. 25.

  • McPherson, Michael S. and Morton Owen Schapiro (1999) 'Reinforcing Stratification in American Higher Education: Some Disturbing Trends', in a paper written for the Macalester Forum on Higher Education Conference, sponsored by Macalester College.

  • Newman, Frank (2000) 'Saving Higher Education's Soul', Change, 33(5), 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Amy Ellen and Benjamin P. Scafidi (2000) 'What's Happened to the Price of College? Aid and Quality Adjusted Price Indices for Four Year Colleges', presented at the NBER Workshop on Higher Education, sponsored by NYU and Georgia State University.

  • United States Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (1987, 1991) Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, AY [CD-ROM], Computer Aided Science Policy Analysis & Research Database System, Quantum Research Corporation [for the National Science Foundation], 1994.

  • United States Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (1993) National Survey of Postsecondary Faculty, [CD-ROM], Pinkerton Computer Consultants.

  • United States Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1996) Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, AY http://www.nces.ed.gov/ipeds/data. html#data

  • Winston, Gordon C. (1989) 'Imperfectly Rational Choice: Rationality as the Result of a Costly Activity', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12(1), 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, Gordon C. (1999) 'Subsidies, Hierarchy and Peers: The Awkward Economics of Higher Education', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 13–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, Gordon C. (2000a) 'A Guide to Measuring College Costs', in Michael F. Middaugh, ed., Analyzing Higher Education Costs: What Institutional Researchers Need to Know. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, Gordon C. (2000b) 'The Positional Arms Race in Higher Education', The Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education, Discussion Paper No. 54.

  • Winston, Gordon C. (2003) 'Toward a Theory of Tuition: Prices, Peer Wages, and Competition in Higher Education', The Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education, Discussion Paper No. 65.

  • Winston, Gordon C., and David J. Zimmerman (2000) 'Where is Aggressive Price Competition Taking Higher Education?, Change, 32(4), 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, Gordon C., and Ivan C. Yen (1995) 'Costs, Prices, Subsidies, and Aid in U.S. Higher Education', The Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education, Discussion Paper No. 32.

  • Winston, Gordon C., Jared C. Carbone, and Ethan G. Lewis (1998) 'What's Been Happening to Higher Education? Facts, Trends, and Data, 1986–87 to 1994-95', The Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education, Discussion Paper No. 47.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Williams College, Williams town, MA, 01267, USA

    Gordon C. Winston

Authors
  1. Gordon C. Winston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winston, G.C. Differentiation Among US Colleges and Universities. Review of Industrial Organization 24, 331–354 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REIO.0000037539.78539.02

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REIO.0000037539.78539.02

Search

Navigation