Skip to main content
Log in

Firm Size and Market Power in Carbonated Soft Drinks

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sutton (1998) offers us a simple way to model firm size distributions across differentiated products industries. We analyse the implications of this approach for company markups using a structural model for a specific industry. We incorporate the complexities of multi-product (brand) companies operating with different (strategic) configurations of product characteristics and stores to estimate brand markups, using Irish AC Nielsen retail data for Carbonated Soft Drinks. As a second step we estimate that market power does not increase in companies with higher market share, controlling for other factors. This challenges a traditional mind-set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Simon P., and Andre de Palma (1992) ‘Multiproduct Firms: A Nested Logit Approach', Journal of Industrial Economics, 60, 261–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Steven (1994) ‘Estimating Discrete-Choice Models of Product Differentiation', RAND Journal of Economics, 25, 242–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Steven, James Levinsohn, and Ariel Pakes (1995) ‘Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium', Econometrica, 63, 841–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, Timothy (1982) ‘The Oligopoly Solution Concept is Identified', Economic Letters, 10, 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, Timothy (1987) ‘Competition and Collusion in the American Automobile Industry: The 1955 Price War', Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 457–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, Timothy (1989) ‘Empirical Methods for Industries with Market Power', in Richard Schmalansee and Robert D. Willig, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 2. NewYork: North-Holland, pp. 1011–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzzacchi, Luigi, and Tommasso Valetti (1999) ‘Firm Size Distribution: Testing the Independent Submarkets Model in the Italian Motor Insurance Industry', Discussion Papers Series EI, STICERD, LSE.

  • Caplin, Andrew, and Barry Nalebuff (1991) ‘Aggregation and Imperfect Competition: On the Existence of Equilibrium', Econometrica, 59, 25–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, Richard E. (1998) ‘Industrial Organization and New Findings on Turnover and Mobility of Firms', Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 1947–1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Juan, Rebecca (2003) ‘The Independent Submarkets Model: An Application to the Spanish Retail Banking Market', International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1461–1488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genesove, David, and Wallace P. Mullin (1998) ‘Testing Static Oligopoly Models: Conduct and Cost in the Sugar Industry', RAND Journal of Economics, 29, 355–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, Jerry (1978) ‘Specification Tests in Econometrics', Econometrica, 46, 1251–1272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, Jerry and W. Taylor (1981) ‘Panel and Unobservable Individual Effects', Econometrica, 49, 1377–1398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, Jerry, Gregory Leonard, and J. Douglas Zona (1994) ‘Competitive Analysis with Differentiated Products', Annles D'#Economie et de Statistique, 34, 159–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkse, Joris, Margaret E. Slade, and Craig Brett (2002) ‘Spatial Price Competition: A Semiparametric Approach', Econometrica, 70, 1111–1155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, John (1991) Sunk Costs and Market Structure: Price Competition, Advertising and the Evolution of Concentration. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, John (1997) ‘Gibrat's Legacy', Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 40–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, John (1998) Technology and Market Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Patrick P., and Ciara Whelan (1999) ‘Modelling Price Dispersion as an Outcome of Competition in the Irish Grocery Market', Journal of Industrial Economics, 47, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Patrick P., and Ciara Whelan (2002a) ‘Product Differentiation and Firm Size Distribution: An Application to Carbonated Soft Drinks', Discussion Papers Series EI/31, STICERD, LSE.

  • Walsh, Patrick P., and Ciara Whelan (2002b) ‘Portfolio Effects and Firm Size Distribution: Carbonated Soft Drinks', The Economic and Social Review, 33, 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mariuzzo, F., Walsh, P.P. & Whelan, C. Firm Size and Market Power in Carbonated Soft Drinks. Review of Industrial Organization 23, 283–299 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REIO.0000031369.95080.9f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REIO.0000031369.95080.9f

Navigation