Skip to main content
Log in

Diversification Strategies and Corporate Coherence Evidence from Italian Leading Firms

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the determinants of coherence and coherence change usinga sample of Italian leading firms in the period 1993–1996. Consistently with thehypotheses advanced by Teece et al. (1994), the econometric analysis highlightsthat relatedness between pairs of sectors and coherence of diversification strategiesare higher when firms are active in sectors sharing similar technological and marketingcharacteristics, and when they are positioned at different stages of the productive chain.Moreover, the findings that firms which enter the group of top 5 industry leaders aremore coherent than the average and that coherence is increasing for firms active insectors more sensitive to EU integration are consistent with the prediction that coherentfirms tend to outperform less coherent ones and that coherence is increasing in morecompetitive environments. Finally, the results show that a deepening of vertical integration strategies is good for coherence change, while an increase of diversification brings a reduction in coherence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buiges, P., F. Ilzkovitz, and J. F. Lebrun (1990) ‘The Impact of the Internal Market by Industrial Sector: The Challenge for the Member States’, European Economy, Special Edition.

  • Davies, S.W., and B. R. Lyons (1996) Industrial Organisation in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. J., and J. F. Christensen (2001) ‘A Market-Process Approach to Corporate Coherence’, Managerial and Decision Economics, 22, 213–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, C. (1994) ‘Corporate Diversification’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4, 623–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orecchia, M. (1998) ‘Coerenza d’impresa e diversificazione settoriale: Un’applicazione alle societàà leaders nell’industria manifatturiera europea’, Economia e Politica Industriale, 99, 169–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Basil Blackwell.

  • Piscitello, L. (2000) ‘Relatedness and Coherence in Technological and Product Diversification of the World’s Largest Firms’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 11, 295–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D., R. Rumelt, G. Dosi, and S. Winter (1994) ‘Understanding Corporate Coherence. Theory and Evidence’, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 23, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valvano, S., and D. Vannoni (2002) ‘Relatedness, Coherence and Coherence Dynamics. Empirical Evidence from Italian Manufacturing’, working paper CERIS-CNR, n. 4, Turin.

  • Vonortas, N. S. (1999) ‘How Do Participants in Research Joint Ventures Diversify?’, Review of Industrial Organisation, 15, 263–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, E. W. (2000) ‘Focusing the Corporate Product: Securities Analysts and Dediversification’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 591–619.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valvano, S., Vannoni, D. Diversification Strategies and Corporate Coherence Evidence from Italian Leading Firms. Review of Industrial Organization 23, 25–41 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REIO.0000005560.15486.9d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REIO.0000005560.15486.9d

Navigation