Skip to main content
Log in

The Processing of Inflectional Morphology: A Comparison of Children with and without Dyslexia

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Children aged 11–12 years with a diagnosis of dyslexia (DR) were compared to chronological and reading-age matched poor readers (PR), and two normal reader groups, age-matched (CA) and spelling and reading-age matched (SA–RA), on their processing of inflectional morphology. In comparison to SA–RAs and PRs, the DRs made more spelling errors on regular past tense verb endings relative to irregular past tense verbs and non-verbs. In reading, the DRs took longer than the other groups to make decisions in the written but not oral condition of a tense judgement task. In addition, they were less affected than the PR and SA–RA groups by case altered disruption to the morpheme boundary of inflected verbs. The findings suggest dyslexic children do not show deficits in morphological processing in spoken language, but they are slower at reading and less accurate at spelling regularly inflected verbs compared with normally developing younger children. This difference could plausibly be accommodated within the Phonological Deficit Hypothesis of dyslexia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aidinis, A. & Nunes, T. (1999).The role of different levels of phonological awareness in the development of reading and spelling in Greek.Reading and Writing:An Interdisciplinary Journal,12,145–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. & Badecker, W. (1999).Stem homograph inhibition and stem allomorphy: Representing and processing inflected forms in a multilevel lexical system.Journal of Memory and Language,412,105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauvillain, C. (1992).Morphological structure in visual word recognition:Evidence from preffixed and suffixed words.Language and Cognitive Processes,9,317–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beers, C.S. & Beers, J.W. (1992).Children 's spelling of English inflectional morphology.In S. Templeton & D.R. Bear (Eds.),Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy:A memorial festchrift for Edmund H.Henderson (pp.219–240).Hillsdale,NJ: Lawerence Earlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Dror, I., Bentin, S. & Frost, R. (1995).Semantic,phonologic,and morphologic skills in reading disabled and normal children:Evidence from perception and pro-duction of spoken Hebrew.Reading Research Quarterly,30,876–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berko, J. (1958).The child 's learning of English morphology.Word,14,150–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D.V.M. (1983).The Test for Reception of Grammar.Published by the author and available from Age and Cognitive Performance Research Centre, University of Manchester:M13 9PL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L. & Bryant, P.E. (1978).Difficulties in auditory organisation as a possible cause of reading backwardness.Nature,271,746–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittain, M. (1970).Inflectional performance and early reading achievement.Reading Research Quarterly,6,34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M. (1992).Persistence of dyslexics 'phonological deficits.Developmental Psy-chology,28,874–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P., Nunes, T. & Bindman, M. (1998).Awareness of language in children who have reading difficulties:Historical comparisons in a longitudinal study.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines,39,501–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, J. (1995).Regular morphology and the lexicon.Language and Cognitive Pro-cesses,10,425–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, J.L. & Slobin, D.I. (1982).Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense.Language,58,265–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A. & Romani, C. (1988).Lexical access and inflectional morphology.Cognition,28,297–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. (1987).The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning-disabled and normal student.Annals of Dyslexia,37,90–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J.F. (1995).Morphological awareness and early reading achievement.In L.B. Feldman (Ed.),Morphological aspects of language processing (pp.189–210). Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J.F. (1996).An exploratory study of morphological errors in children 's writ-ten stories.Reading and Writing:An Interdisciplinary Journal,8,61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J.F. & Nomanbhoy, D.M. (1993).Phonological and morphological aware-ness in rst graders.Applied Psycholinguistics,14,177–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J., Davis, P. & Richman, B. (1971).The American heritage word frequency book.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion, A. (1997).Knowledge of suffixed words:A comparison of reading dis-abled and nondisabled readers.Annals of Dyslexia,47,29–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chialant, D. & Caramazza, A. (1995).Where is morphology and how is it processed? The case of written word recognition.In L.B. Feldman (Ed.),Morphological aspects of language processing (pp.55–76).Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Asso-ciates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, S.H. & Bryant, P.E. (2001).Children 's use of base words to spell derived and inflected forms:Beyond phonological and orthographic similarity.Poster presented at Scientific Studies in Reading (2002,June),Boulder,CO.

  • Doehring, D., Trites, R., Patel, P. & Fiedorowicz, C. (1981).Reading disabilities:The interaction of reading,language and neuropsychological deficits.New York: Aca-demic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, J. (2003).Morphological processing in dyslexic children.Unpublished doctoral thesis,University of Wales,Bangor.

  • Egan, J. & Tainturier, M.J. (2003).A comparison between dyslexic and normally developing children in their processing of inflectional morphology.Paper presented at Bangor Dyslexia Conference (2002,July)Bangor,UK.

  • Elbro, C. (1989).Morphological awareness in dyslexia.In C. Von Euler (Ed.),Wen-ner-gren international symposium series:Brain and readmg.Hampshire,England: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F.W., Shankweiler, D. & Liberman, I.Y. (1985).Spelling pro ciency and sen-sitivity to word structure.Journal of Memory &Language,24,282–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A.E. & Liberman, I.Y. (1995).The role of Phonology and Orthography in Morphological Awareness.In L.B. Feldman (Ed.),Morphological aspects of lan-guage processing (pp.157–188).Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauerwas, L.B. & Walker, J. (2003).Spelling of inflected verb morphology in children with spelling deficits.Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,18,25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A.J. & Shores, R.E. (1982).How learning disabled students 'failure to attend to suffixes affects their oral reading performance.Journal of Learning Disabilities,15,178–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joanisse, M.F., Manis, F.R., Keating, P. & Seidenberg, M.S. (2000).Language de-cits in dyslexic children:Speech perception,phonology,and morphology.Journal of Experimental Psychology,77,30–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.J. & Grant, J.O. (1989) Written narratives of normal and learning disabled children.Annals of Dyslexia,39,40-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C.K. (2000).Rapid processing of base and derived forms of words and grades 4,5,and 6 children 's spellings.Reading and Writing:An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12,277–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C.K. & Parkinson, M.E.(1995).Processing of English morphological struc-ture by poor readers.In C.K. Leong & R.M. Joshi (Eds.),Developmental and acquired dyslexia:Neuropsychological and neurolinguistic perspectives (pp.237–261).Dordrecht,Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, D.L. (1994).Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability.Reading and Writing:An Interdisciplinary Journal,6,19–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, D., Singson, M. & Mann, V (2000).Reading ability and sensitivity to mor-phological relations.Reading and Writing:An Interdisciplinary Journal,12,191–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meunier, F. & Segui, J.(1999).Morphological priming effect:The role of surface frequency.Brain and Language,68,45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manis, F.R., Custodio, R. & Szeszulski, P.(1993).Development of phonological and orthographic skill:A 2-year longitudinal study of dyslexic children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,56,64–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W. & Anderson, R.C.(1984).How many words are there in printed school English?Reading Research Quarterly,19,304–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, M.D. (1997).Neale analysis of reading ability:Second revised (British Edition). Windsor,UK: NFER Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • NFER-Nelson(1993).Verbal and non-verbal Reasoning test series.Windsor,UK: NFER Nelson.

  • Nicolson, R.I. & Fawcett, A.J. (1999).Developmental dyslexia:The role of the cerebellum.Dyslexia,5,155–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Bryant, P. & Bindman, M. (1997).Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes.Developmental Psychology,33,637–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker. S. & Prince, A. (1992).Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar.In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berke-ley Linguistics Society.(2002,June)Berkeley,CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasada, S., Pinker, S. & Snyder, W. (1990).Some evidence that irregular forms are retrieved from memory but regular forms are rule generated.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomics Society (2002,June),New Orleans.

  • Pring, L. (1981).Phonological codes and functional spelling units:Reality and implications.Perception and Psychophysics,30,573–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, B. (1992).The nature of sublexical orthographic organisation:the bigram trough hypothesis examined.Journal of Memory and Language,31,33–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M., Wexler, K. & Cleave, P. (1995).Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional in nitive.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research,38,850–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H. (1988).Morphological knowledge and early writing ability.Language and Speech,31,337–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H., Patterson, P.A. & Kantor, M. (1991).Morphological development and writing ability in children and adults.Language,Speech,and Hearing Services in Schools,22,228–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonell, F.G. (1956).The graded word spelling test.Edinburgh: Goodacre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sénéchal, M. (2000).Morphological effects in children 's spelling of French words. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,54,76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singson, M., Mahony, D. & Mann, V. (2000).The relationship between reading abil-ity and morphological skills:Evidence from derivational suffixes.Reading and Writing:An Interdisciplinary Journal,12,219–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lock, K.M. (1991).Errors of inflection in the writing of normal and poor readers.Language and Speech,34,341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M.J. (2001).From language to reading and dyslexia.Dyslexia,7,37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. (2001).The sensory basis of reading problems.Developmental Neuropsychology, 20,509–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E. (1991).Discrepancy de nitions of reading disability:Has intelligence led us astray?Journal of Learning Disability,21,590–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (1979a).Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect.Mem-ory and Cognition,7,263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (1991).Reading and the mental lexicon.Hove,UK: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, C.M. (1997).Developmental cognitive neuropsychology.Hove: Lawrence Erl-baum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (1997).Spelling in normal children and dyslexics.In B.A. Blachman (Ed.),Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia:Implications for early intervention (pp.191–218).Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. & Baron, J. (1981).Segmental analysis:development and relation to reading ability.In G.C. MacKinnon & T.G. Waller (Eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice,Vol III (pp.159–197).New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S. (1983).A qualitative analysis of morphological development in learning disabled and achieving children.Journal of Learning Disabilities,16,416–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, E.H., Semel, E.M. & Crouse, M,B. (1973).The use of English morphology by high-risk and learning disabled children.Journal of Learning Disabilities,6,59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. & Bowers, P. (1999).The 'double-defficit hypothesis 'for the developmental dyslexias.Journal of Educational Psychology,91,1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthy, J. & Viise, N.M. (1996).Morphological,phonological,and orthographic differences between the spelling of normally achieving children and basic literacy adults.Reading and Writing:An Interdisciplinary Journal,8,129–159.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Egan, J., Pring, L. The Processing of Inflectional Morphology: A Comparison of Children with and without Dyslexia. Reading and Writing 17, 567–591 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044433.30864.23

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044433.30864.23

Navigation