Quality of Life Research

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 1139–1152 | Cite as

Development of a Pain and Discomfort Module for Use with the WHOQOL-100

  • Victoria L. Mason
  • Suzanne M. Skevington
  • Mike Osborn

Abstract

Clinicians and researchers have become increasingly interested in the impact of chronic pain (CP) on quality of life (QoL). This report describes the qualitative stages of developing a pain and discomfort module for persons with CP to be used with the UK World Health Organisation generic measure of quality of life (WHOQOL). The aims were to investigate patients' perceptions of CP and its effect on QoL, and to generate items to be used in the development of a module appended to the UK WHOQOL-100. At the first stage (study 1), six focus groups of patients were invited to discuss how living with pain and discomfort affected QoL. At the second stage (study 2), an international web survey was conducted with English-speaking respondents. 10 new facets of QoL were identified by the focus groups: flare-ups, pain relief, anger and frustration, vulnerability/fear/worry, uncertainty, loss/loneliness/feeling alone, positive strategies, communication, guilt and burdening others, and relationship with health-care providers. The web-survey confirmed and validated these new facets. Although the WHOQOL-100 is a reliable and valid measure of QoL for use in CP, this study shows that additional areas must be assessed when measuring the impact of CP on QoL.

Chronic pain Focus groups Quality of Life Web survey WHOQOL-100 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fallowfield L. The Quality of Life: The Missing Measurement in Health Care. London: Souvenir Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, et al. Role of health-related quality of life in palliative chemotherapy treatment decisions. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 1056-1062.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohen I, Rainville J. Aggressive exercise as treatment for chronic low back pain. Sports Med 2002; 32: 75-82.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saunders C, Egger M, Donovan J, et al. Reporting on quality of life in randomised control trials: Bibliographic study. BMJ 1998; 317: 1191-1194.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Muldoon MF, Barger SD, Flory JD, Manuck SB. What are quality of life measurements measuring? Br Med J 1998; 316: 542-545.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schappert SM. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1989 summary. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 13 1992; No. 110.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gureje O, Von Korff M, Simon GE, Gater R. Persistent Pain and Well-being: A World Health Organisation Study in Primary Care. JAMA 1998; 280: 147-151.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aronoff GM. Chronic pain and the disability epidemic. Clin J Pain 1991; 7: 330-338.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loeser JD. What is chronic pain? Theor Med 1991; 12: 213-225.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    The WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organisation Quality of Life Assessment (the WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organisation. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1403-1409.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    The WHOQOL Group. The WHOQOL: Development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1998; 46: 1569-1585.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Skevington SM. Investigating the relationship between pain and discomfort and quality of life using the WHOQOL. Pain 1998; 76: 395-406.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Skevington SM, Carse MS, Williams AC. Validation of the WHOQOL-100: Pain management improves quality of life for chronic pain patients. Clin J Pain 2001; 17: 264-275.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dunn V. The holistic assessment of the patient in pain. Prof Nurse 2000; 15: 791-793.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Turk DC, Okifuji, A. Pain: Assessment of patients' reporting of pain: An integrated perspective. Lancet 1999; 353: 1784-1788.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain 2000; 84: 95-103.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    BBC News. UK Internet usage surges. Jupiter MMXI. 2001. Available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/ 1500668.stm. Accessed 12-12-2002.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chan C, Bumatay M, Shandwick W, Pileggi S. Internet usage climbs to a record height in October. Nielsen Net Ratings. 2001. Available at http://www.nielsen-netratings. com/pr/pr_011113.pdf. Accessed 12-12-2002.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    NUA. How many online? NUA. 2002. Available at http:// www.nua.ie/surveys/how_many_online/index.html. Accessed 12-12-2002.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Taylor MR, Alman A, Manchester DK. Use of the Internet by patients and their families to obtain genetics-related information. Mayo Clin Proc 2001; 76: 769-771.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bliven BD, Kaufman SE, Spertus JA. Electronic collection of health related quality of life data: Validity, time benefits and patient preference. Qual Life Res 2001; 10: 15-22.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Elliott AM, Smith BH, Penny KI, et al. The epidemiology of chronic pain in the community. Lancet 1999; 354: 1248-1252.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    International Association for the Study of Pain and Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Classification of chronic pain. Pain 1986; (Suppl 3).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mays N, Pope C. Rigour in qualitative research. BMJ 1995; 311: 109-112.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kuzel AJ. Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL (eds), Doing Qualitative Research. London: Sage, 1992; 31-44.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Skevington SM. Measuring quality of life in Britain: Introducing the WHOQOL-100. J Psychosom Res 1999; 47: 449-459.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Skevington SM, MacArthur P, Somerset M. Developing items for the WHOQOL: An investigation of contemporary beliefs about quality of life related to health in Britain. Br J Health Psychol 1997; 2: 55-72.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morgan DL. Focus groups as a qualitative research. Sage University Paper Series on Qualitative Research Methods. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1988.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morgan DL, Kreuger RA. The Focus Group Kit. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1998.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Melzack, R. The McGill Pain questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975; 7: 277-299.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Whitney CW, Von Korff M. Regression to the mean in treated versus untreated chronic pain. Pain 1992; 50: 281-285.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hammond A, Freeman K. One-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of an educational-behavioural joint protection programme for people with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2001; 40: 1044-1051.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jensen MP, Karoly P, Huger R. The development and preliminary validation of an instrument to assess patients' attitudes toward pain. J Psychosom Res 1987; 31: 393-400.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Harkapaa K, Jarvikoski A, Mellin G, et al. Health locus of control beliefs and psychological distress as predictors for treatment outcome in low-back pain patients: Results of a 3-month follow-up of a controlled intervention study. Pain 1991; 46: 35-41.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fernandez E, Turk DC. The scope and significance of anger in the experience of chronic pain. Pain 1995; 61: 165-175.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Symonds TL, Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Main CJ. Absence resulting from low back trouble can be reduced by psychosocial intervention at the work place. Spine 1995; 20: 2738-2745.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    George SZ, Fritz JM, Erhard RE. A comparison of fear-avoidance beliefs in patients with lumbar spine pain and cervical spine pain. Spine 2001; 26: 2139-2145.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cohen I, Rainville J. Aggressive exercise as treatment for chronic low back pain. Sports Med 2002; 32: 75-82.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Thomas SP. A phenomenologic study of chronic pain. West J Nurs Res 2000; 22: 683-699.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Snelling J. The effect of chronic pain on the family unit. J Adv Nurs 1994; 19: 543-551.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sodergren, SC, Hyland ME. What are the positive consequences of illness? Psychol Health 2000; 15: 85-97.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sodergren SC, Hyland ME, Singh SJ, Sewell L. The effect of rehabilitation on positive interpretations of illness. Psychol Health 2002; 17(6): 753-760.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Folkman S. Positive psychological states and coping with severe stress. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1207-1221.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Loeser JD. Economic implications of pain management. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999; 43: 957-959.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Maetzel A, Li L. The economic burden of low back pain: A review of studies published between 1996 and 2001. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2002; 16: 23-30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victoria L. Mason
    • 1
  • Suzanne M. Skevington
    • 1
  • Mike Osborn
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, WHO Field Centre for the Study of Quality of LifeUniversity of BathUK
  2. 2.Palliative Care Team, RoyalUnited HospitalBathUK

Personalised recommendations