Skip to main content

Assessing Quality of Life in Individuals with Hereditary Blood Coagulation Disorders


The aim of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the SF-36 questionnaire among the patients with hereditary blood coagulation disorders, to compare their quality of life (QoL) to that of healthy controls, and to identify the dimensions of life the patients consider most important. Results showed that the SF-36 questionnaire had good internal consistency reliability and construct and known group validity in individuals with hereditary blood coagulation disorders. Leisure activities/hobbies, availability of work/study, followed by relationships with other people, own health and relationships with family/relatives appeared most frequently across the patients' and controls' priority ranks. The areas affected most by the disease were financial security, own health and relationships with family/relatives. A comparison of standardized scale scores suggests that blood coagulation disorders are diseases with a predominantly physical impact. Patients with blood coagulation disorders had health-related quality of life that was lower in most domains compared to healthy controls. However, when a wider concept of QoL was applied no differences between the patients' and controls' perceived QoL could be noted.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1.

    Nathwani AC, Tuddenham EGD. Epidemiology of coagulation disorders. Bailliere Clin Haematol 1992; 8: 383-439.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Teigland J, Tjonnfjord G, Evensen S, Charania B. Knee arthroplasty in hemophilia 5–12 year follow-up of 15 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64: 153-156.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Coffin CM. Potentially catastrophic bleeding disorders. Approach to diagnosis and management. Postgrad Med 1989; 3: 217-221, 224–225.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Rosendaal FR, Smit C, Varekamp I, et al. Modern hemophilia treatment: Medical improvements and quality of life. J Intern Med 1990; 228: 633-640.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Aledort LM, Haschmeyer RH, Pettersson H, the Orthopaedic Outcome Study Group. A longitudinal study of orthopaedics outcomes for severe factor-VIII-deficient hemophiliacs. J Intern Med 1994; 236: 391-399.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Triemstra AHM, Smit C, Van der Ploeg, et al. Two decades of hemophilia treatment in the Netherlands, 1972–1992. Haemophilia 1995; 1: 165-171.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Triemstra AHM, van der Ploeg HM, Smit C, et al. Well-being of hemophilia patients: A model for direct and indirect effects of medical parameters on the physical and psychological functioning. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47: 581-593.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Liesner RJ, Khair K, Hann IM. The impact of prophylactic treatment on children with severe hemophilia. Br J Hematol 1996; 92: 973-978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Schnik M, Stucki G, Rodriquez M, et al. Haemophilic arthropathy: Assessment of quality of life after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Rheumatol 1999; 18: 468-472.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Miners AH, Sabin CA, Tolley KH, et al. Assessing health-related quality of life in individuals with hemophilia. Haemophilia 1999; 5: 378-385.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Molho P, Rolland N, Lebrun T, et al. Epidemiological survey of the orthopaedic status of severe hemophilia A and B patients in France. Haemophilia 2000; 6: 23-32.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Trippoli S, Vaiani M, Linari S, et al. Multivariate analysis of factors influensing quality of life and utility in patients with hemophilia. Haematologica 2001; 86: 722-728.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Flanagan JC. A research approach to improving our quality of life. Am Psychologist 1978; 33: 138-147.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: New England Medical Center, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hunt S, McEwen J, McKenna SP. Measuring Health Status. London: Croom Helm, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-36 Physical and Mental Summary Scales: A User's Manual. Boston: New England Medical Center, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bowling A. Measuring Health. A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    de Bruin AF, de Witte LP, Stevens FCJ, Diedericks JPM. Sickness Impact Profile: The state of art of a generic functional status measure. Soc Sci Med 1992; 8: 1003-1014.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bowling A. What things are important in people's lives? A survey of the public's judgements to inform scales of health related quality of life. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1447-1462.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dillon WR, Goldstein M. Multivariate Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: John Wiley, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    American Psychological Association. Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu JFR. The MOS 36-item short form health surveys (SF36). III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability across diverse patients groups. Med Care 1994; 32: 40-66.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    O'Boyle CA, McGee HM, Hickey A, et al. Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement. Lancet 1992; 339: 1088-1091.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Browne JP, O'Boyle CA, McGee HM, et al. Individual quality of life in the healthy elderly. Qual Life Res 1994; 3: 235-244.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Solovieva S. Clinical severity of disease, functional disability and health-related quality of life. Three-year follow-up study of 150 Finnish patients with coagulation disorders. Haemophilia 2001; 7: 53-63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solovieva, S., Santavirta, N., Santavirta, S. et al. Assessing Quality of Life in Individuals with Hereditary Blood Coagulation Disorders. Qual Life Res 13, 987–1000 (2004).

Download citation

  • Construct validity
  • Hemophilia
  • Known group validity
  • Quality of life assessment
  • SF-36