Skip to main content
Log in

The ED-EQoL: The development of a new quality of life measure for patients with erectile dysfunction

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To identify the important issues which have an impact on the quality of life (QoL) of men suffering from erectile dysfunction (ED) and to generate a new ED-specific QoL questionnaire ready to undergo further psychometric testing. Methods: QoL issues relating to ED were generated through in-depth qualitative interviews of 29 patients, literature review and consultation with other healthcare professionals. The issues were formulated into a questionnaire, which was piloted using 40 patients with ED and subsequently refined using well-established principles of questionnaire development. Results: The qualitative interviews revealed numerous psychosocial problems associated with ED, which were operationalised into a 40-item questionnaire. Pilot testing allowed the questionnaire to be reduced to a manageable 15-item final questionnaire while maintaining face and content validity and the potential to discriminate between men with varying degrees of affected QoL. This questionnaire had a Cronbach's α of 0.94. Conclusions: A new ED-specific QoL measure has been developed using appropriate methodology. Qualitative techniques identified a range of psychosocial morbidity in men with ED, leading to a simple but robust instrument with face and content validity. This questionnaire, Erectile Dysfunction – Effect on quality of life (ED-EQoL), has now undergone psychometric testing for validity and reliability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wagner TH, Patrick DL, McKenna SP, Froese PS. Cross-cultural development of a quality of life measure for men with erection difficulties. Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 443.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, et al. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: Results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol 1994; 151(1): 54-61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boggs WM. Therapy Markets and Emerging Technologies: Prospects for Erectile Dysfunction Therapies. Decis Resour Inc 2000.

  4. Fugl-Meyer AR, Lodnert G, Bränholm IB, Fugl-Meyer KS. On life satisfaction in male erectile dysfunction. Int J Impotence Res 1997; 9: 141.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krane RJ, Goldstein I, Saenz de Tejada I. Impotence. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 1648.

    Google Scholar 

  6. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence: Impotence. JAMA 1993; 270: 83.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gheorghiu S, Godschalk M, Gentili A, Mulligan T. Quality of life in patients using self-administered intracavernous injections of prostaglandin E1 for erectile dysfunction. J Urol 1996; 156: 80.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): A multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49: 822.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parkerson GR, Willke RJ, Hays RD. An international comparison of the reliability and responsiveness of the Duke Health Profile for measuring health-related quality of life of patients treated with alprostadil for erectile dysfunction. Med Care 1999; 37: 56.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Willke RJ, Glick HA, McCarron TJ, Erder, MH, Althof SE, Linet OI. Quality of life effects of alprostadil therapy for erectile dysfunction. J Urol 157: 2124.

  11. MacDonagh R. Quality of life and its assessment in urology. Br J Urol 1996; 78: 485.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Glaser BG, Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research. California: Sage, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sandelowski M. Rigor or rigor mortis: The problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. Adv Nurs Sci 1993; 16:2, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic enquiry. Educat Commun Technol J 1982; 30:4, 233.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Tavistock, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miles MB, Huberman M. Qualitative Data Analysis. Beverley Hills: Sage, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. OUP: Oxford, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ferguson GA. On the theory of test development. Psychometrika 1949; 14: 61.

    Google Scholar 

  21. MacDonagh R, Ewings P, Porter T. The effect of erectile dysfunction on quality of life: psychometric testing of a new quality of life measure for patients with erectile dysfunction. J Urol 2002; 167(1): 212-217.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacDonagh, R., Porter, T., Pontin, D. et al. The ED-EQoL: The development of a new quality of life measure for patients with erectile dysfunction. Qual Life Res 13, 361–368 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000018471.04066.4c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000018471.04066.4c

Navigation