Quality of Life Research

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 179–190 | Cite as

The use of focus groups in evaluating quality of life components among elderly Chinese people

  • Kai-Kuen Leung
  • En-Chang Wu
  • Bee-Horng Lue
  • Li-Yu Tang


In Taiwan, to measure the quality of life (QOL) of elderly Chinese, one must rely on instruments developed in other Chinese or Western populations and not specifically for the elderly. The purpose of this study is to understand the components of QOL for elderly Chinese from Taiwan living in residential homes or in their communities. Forty-four elderly men and women divided into six focus groups were interviewed on video tape and the resultant recording was analyzed qualitatively by six independent researchers. The study yielded 15 QOL domains grouped into six dimensions: physical health (physical well-being, impact of illness, medical care), psychological health (mood states, life attitude and retrospection, philosophy of living, self-efficacy), social function (connectedness, exercise and leisure activities, social activities and services), living environment (living environment and arrangements, institutional factors), economic status, and religion and death (religion, death). For elderly Chinese in Taiwan, positive and negative life domains are equally important in the perception of life quality; person-environment interaction is a major consideration in the evaluation of QOL; family ties are an important component of QOL; traditional Chinese beliefs exert a positive influence on perceived QOL; and social functioning and vitality have a different meaning in Chinese compared to Western cultures.

Chinese Elderly Focus group interview Quality of life 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Carver DJ, Chapman CA, Thomas VS, Stadnyk KJ, Rockwood K. Validity and reliability of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-20 questionnaire as a measure of quality of life in elderly people living at home. Age Ageing 1999; 28(2): 169-174.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Leo D, Diekstra RF, Lonnqvist J, et al. LEIPAD, an internationally applicable instrument to assess quality of life in the elderly. Behav Med 1998; 24(1): 17-27.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kutner NG, Ory MG, Baker DI, Schechtman KB, Hornbrook MC, Mulrow CD. Measuring the quality of life of the elderly in health promotion intervention clinical trials. Public Health Rep 1992; 107: 530-539.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fuh JL, Wang SJ, Lu SR, Juang KD, Lee SJ. Psychometric evaluation of a Chinese (Taiwanese) version of the SF-36 health survey amongst middle-aged women from a rural community. Qual Life Res 2000; 9: 675-683.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhao H, Kanda K. Translation and validation of the Standard Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res 2000; 9: 129-137.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lam CLK, Gandek B, Ren XS, Chan MS. Test of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese (HK) version of the SF-36 health survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 1139-1147.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tao G, Chen F, Liu X, et al. Analysis of related factors to life satisfaction of 1380 old people in Beijing. Chinese Mental Health J 1998; 12: 338-340 [Chinese].Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou Y, Zhu Z, Zhong S. A study on the relationship of primary hypertension in elderly and their quality of life in Changsha City. Chinese J Epidemiol 1998; 19: 24-26 [Chinese].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang DS, Li LJ, Zhang YL, et al. Study on quality of life of general population in Human province: Part I. Theoretical framework. Chinese Mental Health J 1995; 9: 136-139 [Chinese].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li LJ, Hao W, Yang DS, et al. Study on quality of life of general population in Hunan province: Part III. Development of the Quality of Life Inventory. Chinese Mental Health J 1995; 9: 227-231 [Chinese].Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ren XS, Amick III B, Zhou L, Gandek B. Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey in the United States. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 1129-1138.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ip WC, Kwan YK, Pong GTY, Poon ACK. A health status indicator for the Chinese elderly in Hong Kong. Int Bio-Med Comput 1995; 40: 133-137.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Molassiotis A, Chan CW, Yam BM, Chan SJ. Quality of life in Chinese women with gynaecological cancers. Support Care Cancer 2001; 9(1): 18-24.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Phillips DR (ed.), Ageing in east and south-east Asia. London: Edward Arnold, 1992.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yu CLM, Fielding R, Chan CLW, et al. Measuring quality of life of Chinese cancer patients: A validation of the Chinese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General (FACT G) Scale. Cancer 2000; 88: 1715-1727.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cheng AY, Tsui EY, Hanley AJG, Zinman B. Cultural adaptation of the diabetes quality of life measure for Chinese patients. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 1216-1217.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ho SC, Woo J, Lau J. Life satisfaction and associated factors in older Hong Kong Chinese. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995; 43: 252-255.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lam CLK, Lauder IJ. The impact of chronic diseases on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of Chinese patients in primary care. Fam Pract 2000; 17: 159-166.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ren XS, Chang K. Evaluating health status of elderly Chinese in Boston. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 429-435.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chang DF, Chun CA, Takeuchi DT, Shen H. SF-36 Health Survey: Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability in a community sample of Chinese Americans. Med Care 2000; 38: 542-548.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting & Statistics. A Study on the Youth and the Elderly in Taiwan. Taipei: DGBAS, Executive Yuan, ROC, 1987.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting & Statistics. Report on the old status survey Taiwan area, Republic of China. Taipei: DGBAS, Executive Yuan, ROC, 1992.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Basch CE. Focus group interview: An underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Educ Q 1987; 14: 411-448.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Calder BJ. Focus groups and the nature of qualitative research. J Market Res 1977; 14: 353-364.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Krueger RA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. California, Sage, 1994.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lerner DJ, Levine S. Health-related quality of life: Origins, gaps, and directions. In: Fitzpatrick R (ed.), Advances in Medical Sociology: Quality of Life in Health Care. Connecticut: JAI press, 1994; 139-158.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gilson BS, Gilson JS, Bergner M, et al. The Sickness Impact Profile: Development of an outcome measure of health care. Am J Public Health 1975; 65: 1304-1310.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Patrick DL, Erickson P. Assessing health-related quality of life for clinical decision-making. In: Walker SR, Rosser RM (eds), Quality of Life Assessment: Key Issues in the 1990s. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1993; 11-63.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 191-215.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Grembowski D, Patrick D, Diehr P, et al. Self-efficacy and health behavior among older adults. J Health Soc Behav 1993; 34(2): 89-104.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hess BB, Waring JM. Changing patterns of aging and family bonds in later life. Fam Coordinator 1978; 27: 303-314.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Venkatraman MM. A cross-cultural study of the subjective well-being of married elderly persons in the United States and India. J Gerontol 1995; 50B: S35-S44.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ardelt M. Wisdom and life satisfaction in old age. J Gerontol 1997; 52B: P15-P27.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Best DL, Williams JE. Sex, gender, and culture. In: Berry JW, Segall MH, Kagitcibasi C (eds), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2nd ed. vol 3. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1980; 163-212.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lawton MP. Environment and other determinants of well-being in older people. Gerontologist 1983; 23: 349-357.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wylie CM. The definition and measurement of health and disease. Public Health Rep 1970; 85: 100-104.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ward P. Quality of Life in Residential Care. London: Personal Social Services Council, 1980.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Li L, Young D, Wei H, et al. The relationship between objective life status and subjective life satisfaction with quality of life. Behav Med 1998; 23: 149-159.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Leung KK, Tang LY, Lue BH. Self-rated health and mortality in Chinese institutional elderly persons. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 1107-1116.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kleinman A. The cultural meanings and social uses of illness: A role for medical anthropology and clinically oriented social science in the development of primary care theory and research. J Fam Pract 1983; 16: 539-545.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kai-Kuen Leung
    • 1
  • En-Chang Wu
    • 2
  • Bee-Horng Lue
    • 1
    • 3
  • Li-Yu Tang
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Family MedicineNational Taiwan University HospitalTaiwan
  2. 2.School of PsychologyNational Taiwan University College of ScienceTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of Social MedicineNational Taiwan University College of MedicineTaiwan
  4. 4.College of NursingYang Ming UniversityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations