Skip to main content
Log in

Review Essay: Unifying Social Movement Theories

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

references

  • McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. (Second edition 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (1996). To map contentious politics. Mobilization: An International Journal, 1, 17-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, G. M., & Williams, R. H. (2002). Ideological language and social movement mobilization: A sociolinguistic analysis of segregationists' ideologies. Sociological Theory, 20, 328-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, H. W., Jr. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. A., Cress, D. M., Downey, L., & Jones, A. W. (1998). Disrupting the “quotidian”: Reconceptualizing the relationship between breakdown and the emergence of collective action. Mobilization: An International Journal, 3, 1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (2002). Stories, identities, and political change. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerald M. Platt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Platt, G.M. Review Essay: Unifying Social Movement Theories. Qualitative Sociology 27, 107–116 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000015547.21746.e2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000015547.21746.e2

Keywords

Navigation