Abstract
This article examines the meanings of “race” and difference in the first years of American colonialism in the Philippines, Guam, and Samoa. Moving beyond existing sociological studies of “race” and “colonial discourse,” I demonstrate that the meanings of racial difference in the U.S. Pacific empire were contemporaneously polyvalent, constituting an overarching field of multiple rather than uniform classifications. The different meanings formed the basis for intra-imperial debate among colonizing agents. They also contributed to notable variations in forms of colonial governance and policy across the empire. The implication for future study is that “race” should best be apprehended as a “code” that takes on specific meanings and obtains its social force only in particular contexts of use and utterance.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Alfonso, O. (1968). Taft's views on 'The Philippines for the Filipinos.' Asian Studies, 6, 237-247.
Atkinson, F. (1902). The educational problem in the Philippines. Atlantic Monthly, 533, 360-365.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
Bonilla-Silva, E. (1997). Rethinking racism: Toward a structural interpretation. American Sociological Review, 62, 465-480.
Born, E. J. (1911). Our administration in Guam. The Independent, 71, 636-642.
Burch, H. (1902). Suffrage in colonies. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Annals0, 19, 78-101.
Carano, P., & Sanchez, P. C. (1964). A complete history of Guam. Tokyo and Rutland: Charles E. Tuttle Company.
Chatterjee, P. (1993). The nation and its fragments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Commandant of U.S. Naval Station, Samoa (1904). Annual report of the Commandant, U.S. Naval Station, Tutuila, Pago Pago, Samoa, July 7, 1904. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Cox, L. M. (1917). The island of Guam. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Darden, Capt. T. F. (1951). Historical sketch of the naval administration of the government of American Samoa. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Forbes, C. W. (1928). The Philippine Islands. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
French, W. (1905). An isolated American island: How we are neglecting our duty to Guam. Booklover's Magazine, 5, 369-379.
Gatewood, W. B., Jr. (1971). “Smoked Yankees” and the struggle for empire: Letters from Negro soldiers, 1898–1902. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Go, J. (2000). Chains of empire, projects of state: Political education and U.S. colonial rule in Puerto Rico and the Philippines. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 42, 333-362.
Go, J. (2003). Transcultured states: Elite political culture in Puerto Rico and the Philippines during U.S. rule. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Sociology, University of Illinois.
Golay, F. A. (1984). The search for revenues. In P. W. Stanley (Eds.), Reappraising an empire: New perspectives on Philippine-American history (pp. 231-260). Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.
Governor of Guam (1901–1905). Annual report of the governor. Unpublished manuscript. United States National Archives, Office of the Secretary of the Navy, record group 80, microfilm no. 181.
Governor of Samoa (1913). American Samoa: A general report by the governor. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Governor of Samoa (1927). American Samoa: A general report by the governor. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Gray, J. A. C. 1960. Amerika Samoa: A history of American Samoa and its United States naval administration. Annapolis, MD: United States Naval Institute.
Ide, H. C. (1897). Our interest in Samoa. North American Review, 165, 155-173.
Jacobson, M. F. (2000). Barbarian virtues: The United States encounters foreign peoples at home and abroad. New York: Hill and Wang.
Jernegan, P. F. (1910). The Philippine citizen: A text-book of civics, describing the nature of government, the Philippine government, and the rights and duties of citizens of the Philippines. Manila: Philippine Education Publishing Co.
Karnow, S. (1989). In our image: America's empire in the Philippines. New York: Ballantine Books.
Keesing, F. (1934). Samoa: Islands of conflict. Foreign Policy Reports, 9, 294-304.
Kramer, P. (1999). Cosmopolitan developments: Minstrelsy, mestizaje, and assimilation in the occupied Philippines, 1898–1918. Unpublished manuscript. Department of History, Johns Hopkins University.
LeRoy, J. A. (1902). Race prejudice in the Philippines. Atlantic Monthly, 90, 100-112.
Loveman, M. (1999a). Is “race” essential? American Sociological Review, 64, 891-898.
Loveman, M. (1999b). Making “race” and nation in the United States, South Africa, and Brazil: Taking making seriously. Theory and Society, 28, 903-927.
Margold, J. A. (1995). Egalitarian ideals and exclusionary practices: U.S. pedagogy in the colonial Philippines. Journal of Historical Sociology, 8, 374-394.
Marx, A. W. (1998). Making race and nation: A comparison of South Africa, the United States, and Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Monroe, P., Philippines Board of Educational Survey, and Philippines Educational Survey Commission (1925). A survey of the educational system of the Philippine Islands by the Board of Educational Surveys: Created under Acts 3162 and 3196 of the Philippine legislature. Manila: Bureau of Printing.
Nordstrom, A. D. (1992). Wood nymphs and patriots: Depictions of Samoans in The National Geographic Magazine. Visual Sociology, 7, 49-59.
Palmer, F. (1900). White man and brown man in the Philippines. Scribner's, 27, 76-86.
Price, F. M. (1906). Missionary work in Guam. Missionary Review of the World, 19[29], 507-515.
Riggs, A. S. (1903). A letter from the Philippines. Atlantic Monthly, 92, 256-266.
Ross, E. A. (1901). The causes of race superiority. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Annals0, 18, 67-89.
Safford, W. E. (1903). Guam and its people. Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, 57, 493-508.
Safford, W. E. (1905). Our smallest possession-Guam. National Geographic Magazine, 16, 231-237.
Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
Schroeder, S. (1905). Another view of Guam. Booklover's Magazine, 5, 717-719.
Schroeder, S. (1922). A half century of naval service. New York/London: D. Appleton & Co.
Seidman, S. (1996). Empire and knowledge: More troubles, new opportunities for sociology. Contemporary Sociology, 25, 313-316.
Stanley, P. (1974). A nation in the making: The Philippines and the United States, 1899–1921. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Steinmetz, G. (1998). Critical realism and historical sociology: A review article. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 39, 170-186.
Steinmetz, G. (2002). Precoloniality and colonial subjectivity: Ethnographic discourse and native policy in German overseas imperialism, 1780s–1914. Political Power and Social Theory, 15, 135-228.
Stocking, G. W., Jr. (1968). Race, culture, and evolution. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Stoler, A. L. (1992). Rethinking colonial categories: European communities and the boundaries of rule. In N. B. Dirks (Ed.), Colonialism and culture (pp. 319-352). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Stoler, A. L. (1997). Racial histories and their regime of truth. Political Power and Social Theory, 11, 183-206.
Taft, W. H. (1908). Special report of Wm. H. Taft Secretary of War to the President on the Philippines. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Thomas, N. (1994). Colonialism's culture: Anthropology, travel, government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Thompson, L. (2002). Representation and rule in the imperial archipelago. American Studies Asia, 1, 3-39.
Tilley, B. F. (1901). Development of our possessions in Samoa. The Independent, 53, 1601-1602.
Todorov, T. (1986). “Race,” writing, and culture. In H. L. Gates, Jr. (Ed.),“Race,” writing, and difference (pp. 370-380). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
United States Adjutant-General's Office (USAG), Military Information Division (1900). Report on the Island of Guam by Brig. General Joseph Wheeler, U.S. Army, June, 1900. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
United States Congress. Committee on Territories and Insular Possessions (1928). American Samoa: Joint hearings before the Committee on Territories, United States Senate and Insular Possessions and the Committee on Insular Affairs, House of Representatives, Seventieth Congress, First Session on S. Con. Res. 2. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
United States Navy Department (USND) (1901). Annual reports of the Navy Department for the year 1901, report of the Secretary of the Navy, miscellaneous reports. In two parts, part 1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
USND (1904a). Annual reports of the Navy Department for the Year 1904, report of the Secretary of the Navy, miscellaneous reports. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
USND (1904b). Data relating to the Island of Guam. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
USND (1905). Brief extracts from publications, memoranda furnished, Congress, general orders and annual reports from 1901–1904, relative to the Island of Guam. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
United States Philippine Commission (USPC) (1900). Report of the Philippine Commission to the President (January 31, 1900). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
United States Senate Committee on the Philippines (1902). Affairs in the Philippines: Hearings before the Committee on the Philippines of the United States Senate. Senate document no. 331, 57th Congress, 1st session. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
United States War Department (USWD) (1899). Annual reports of the War Department for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1899, report of the Secretary of War, miscellaneous reports. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Wacquant, L. (1997). For an analytic of racial domination. Political Power and Social Theory, 11, 221-234.
Webster, H. (1899). Samoa: Navigator's islands. National Geographic Magazine, 10, 207-217.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Go, J. “Racism” and Colonialism: Meanings of Difference and Ruling Practices in America's Pacific Empire. Qualitative Sociology 27, 35–58 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000015543.66075.b4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000015543.66075.b4