Abstract
Early in the 19th century local governmentsspent less than either the federal or stategovernments. By the end of the 19thcentury local governments spent more thanthe federal and state governments combined. This growth is obviously related to thegrowth of cities, but cities continued togrow in the 20th century, while the localgovernment share of total governmentexpenditures fell, so the growth of citiescannot be the complete answer. Anexamination of expenditures and revenues intwo cities – Boston and Baltimore –suggests that no one component ofexpenditures was responsible for increasesin total spending. Rather, it appears thatthe primary causal factor was revenuegrowth. Cities rely heavily on propertytaxes, and the increasing value of taxableproperty allowed cities to raise increasingamounts of revenue, leading to increasedgovernment spending.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baumol, W.J. (1967). The macroeconomics of unbalanced growth. American Economic Review 57: 415–426.
Blake, N.M. (1956). Water for the cities: A history of the urban water supply problem in the United States.Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Borcherding, T.E. (Ed.) (1977). Budgets and bureaucrats: The sources of government growth.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J.M. (1980). The power to tax: Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davis, L.E. and Legler, J. (1966). Government in the American economy, 1815-1902: A quantitative study. Journal of Economic History 26: 514–552.
Higgs, R. (1987). Crisis and Leviathan: Critical episodes of the growth of American government.New York: Oxford University Press.
Holcombe, R.G. (1996). The growth of the federal government in the 1920s. Cato Journal 16: 175–199.
Holcombe, R.G. and Lacombe, D.J. (2001). The growth of local government in the United States from 1820 to 1870. Journal of Economic History 61: 184–189.
Hollander, J.H. (1899). The financial history of Baltimore.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press. Reprint: New York: AMS Press, 1982.
Huse, C.P. (1916). The financial history of Boston from May 1, 1822, to January 31, 1909.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Legler, J.B., Sylla, R. and Wallis, J.J. (1988). U.S. city finances and the growth of government, 1850-1902. Journal of Economic History 48: 347–356.
Melosi, M.V. (2000). The sanitary city: Urban infrastructure in America from colonial times to the present.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Meltzer, A.H. and Richard, S.F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy 89: 914–927.
Monkkonen, E.H. (1995). The local state: Public money and American cities.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Niskanen, W.A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government.Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
Peacock, A.T. and Wiseman, J. (1961). The growth of government expenditures in the United Kingdom.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Peltzman, S. (1980). The growth of government. Journal of Law & Economics 23: 209–287.
Rassler, K.A. and Thompson, W.R. (1985). War making and state making: Government expenditures, tax revenues, and global wars. American Political Science Review 79: 491–507.
Studenski, P. and Krooss, H.E. (1952). Financial history of the United States.New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sylla, R.E., Legler, J.B. and Wallis, J. (1995). State and local government [United States]: Sources and uses of funds, city and county data, nineteenth century [Computer file].New York, NY: R.E. Sylla, New York University/Athens, GA: J.B. Legler, University of Geor-gia/ College Park MD: J. Wallis, University of Maryland [producers], 1994. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Wallis, J.J. (1984). The birth of the old federalism: Financing the new deal, 1932-1940. Journal of Economic History 44: 139–159.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holcombe, R.G., Lacombe, D.J. Factors Underlying the Growth of Local Government in the 19th Century United States. Public Choice 120, 359–377 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PUCH.0000044288.21253.7a
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PUCH.0000044288.21253.7a