Skip to main content
Log in

Groups, Growth and Trust: Cross-Country Evidence on the Olson and Putnam Hypotheses

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Olson (1982) and Putnam (1993) providesharply conflicting perspectives on theimpact of private associations on economicwell-being and social conflict. Olson(1982) emphasized their propensity to actas special interest groups that lobby forpreferential policies, imposingdisproportionate costs on the rest ofsociety. Putnam (1993) viewed membershipsin horizontal associations as a source ofgeneralized trust and social ties conduciveto governmental efficiency and economicperformance. Using cross-country data,this paper investigates the impact ofassociational memberships on generalizedtrust and economic performance, findinglittle support for Olson's view of theimpact of groups, and only mixed supportfor the Putnam perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barro, R. and Lee, J. (1993). International comparisons of educational attainment. Journal of Monetary Economics 32: 363–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergsten, G.S. (1985). On the role of social norms in a market economy. Public Choice 65: 113–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. (1997). Civil society and the collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics 49: 401–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, L. (1992). Opting out of the legal system: Extralegal contractual relations in the diamond industry. Journal of Legal Studies 21: 115–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. and Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science 41: 999–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, K. (1983). A statistical test of Olson's model. In D. Mueller (Ed.), The political economy of growth, 57–78. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claibourn, M.P. and Martin, P.S. (2000). Trusting and joining?: An empirical test of the reciprocal nature of social capital. Political Behavior 22: 267–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, D. and Heckelman, J. (2002). Interest groups and investment: A further test of the Olson hypothesis. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Public Choice Society in San Diego, California, March.

  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckelman, J. (2000). Consistent estimates of the impact of special interest groups on economic growth. Public Choice 104: 319–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, E. and Haist, M. (2000). The civic community, interest groups, and economic development in the states. Unpublished manuscript. University of Kentucky, Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S. (2002). Social capital and government performance: Evidence from the states. American Journal of Political Science 46: 772–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics 7: 207–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 1251–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murrell, P. (1984). An examination of the factors affecting the formation of interest groups in OECD countries. Public Choice 43: 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murrell, P. and Olson, M. (1991). The devolution of centrally planned economies. Journal of Comparative Economics 15: 239–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, D. and Pritchett, L. (1999). Cents and sociability: Household income and social capital in rural Tanzania. Economic Development and Cultural Change 47: 871–897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1963). Rapid growth as a destabilizing force. Journal of Economic History 23: 529–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (2000). Power and prosperity: Outgrowing communist and capitalist dictatorships.New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D. and Rochon, T. (1998). Are all associations alike?: Member diversity, associational type and the creation of social capital. American Behavioral Scientist 42: 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knack, S. Groups, Growth and Trust: Cross-Country Evidence on the Olson and Putnam Hypotheses. Public Choice 117, 341–355 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PUCH.0000003736.82456.04

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PUCH.0000003736.82456.04

Keywords

Navigation