Abstract
Recently much attention has been devoted to superlative indexes in the context of the national accounts. In this paper we advocate the use of the implicit Törnqvist quantity index to measure real GDP. This index, which has been proposed by Diewert and Morrison (1986), has never received serious consideration in the literature. Yet, compared to the better-known Fisher index, the implicit Törnqvist index of real GDP has a number of advantages. Thus, it can be shown to be exact for the Translog GDP function, it allows for a complete multiplicative decomposition of nominal and real GDP, and it is consistent with state-of-the-art measures of total factor productivity that typically rely on the Törnqvist aggregation. Estimates for a sample of 26 countries are reported. We find that the Laspeyres quantity index still used by the statistical agencies of most countries tends to underestimate real growth. Over the 1960–1996 period, the cumulated shortfall was as much as 13.4% of GDP in the case of Japan.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamsen, Y., R. Aeppli, E. Atukeren, M. Graff, C. Muüller and B. Schips. (2003). “The Swiss Disease: Facts and Artefacts.” Working Paper 71, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich.
Afriat, S. N. (1977). The Price Index. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Allen, R. G. D. (1975). Index Numbers in Theory and Practice. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen and W. E. Diewert. (1982). “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity.” Econometrica 50, 1393–1414.
Christensen, L. R. and D. Cummings. (1981). “Real Product, Real Factor Input, and Productivity in the Republic of Korea, 1960–1973.” Journal of Development Economics 8, 285–302.
Christensen, L. R., D. W. Jorgenson and L. J. Lau. (1973). “Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers.” Review of Economics and Statistics 55, 28–45.
Diewert, W. E. (1974). Applications of Duality Theory. In M. D. Intriligator and D. A. Kendrick (eds.), Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Diewert, W. E. (1976). “Exact and Superlative Index Numbers.” Journal of Econometrics 4, 115–145.
Diewert, W. E. (1983). The Theory of the Output Price Index and the Measurement of Real Output Change. In W. E. Diewert and C. Montmarquette (eds.), Price Level Measurement. Ottawa, Ont.: Statistics Canada.
Diewert, W. E. (1992). “Fisher Ideal Output, Input, and Productivity Indexes Revisited.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 3, 211–248.
Diewert, W. E. (1993). Overview of Volume I. In W. E. Diewert and A. O. Nakamura (eds.), Essays in Index Number Theory, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Diewert, W. E. and C. J. Morrison. (1986). “Adjusting Output and Productivity Indexes for Changes in the Terms of Trade.” Economic Journal 96, 659–679.
Eurostat. (1995). European System of Accounts, ESA 1995. Brussels: European Union.
Jorgenson, D. W. and Z. Griliches. (1967). “The Explanation of Productivity Change.” Review of Economic Studies 34, 249–283.
Kohli, U. (1978). “A Gross National Product Function and the Derived Demand for Imports and Supply of Exports.” Canadian Journal of Economics 11, 167–182.
Kohli, U. (1986). “Direct Index Numbers and Demand Theory.” Australian Economic Papers 25, 17–32.
Kohli, U. (1990). “Growth Accounting in the Open Economy: Parametric and Nonparametric Estimates.” Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 16, 125–136.
Kohli, U. (1991). Technology, Duality, and Foreign Trade: The GNP Function Approach to Modeling Imports and Exports. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Kohli, U. (2003). “GDP Growth Accounting: A National Income Function Approach.” Review of Income and Wealth 49, 23–34.
Landefeld, J. S. and R. P. Parker. (1995). “Preview of the Comprehensive Revision of the National Income and Product Accounts: BEA's New Featured Measures of Output and Prices.” Survey of Current Business July, 31–38.
Landefeld, J. S. and R. P. Parker. (1997). “BEA's Chain Indexes, Time Series, and Measures of Long-Term Economic Growth.” Survey of Current Business May, 58–68.
Morrison, C. and W. E. Diewert. (1990). Productivity Growth and Changes in the Terms of Trade in Japan and the United States. In C. R. Hulten (ed.), Productivity Growth in Japan and the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, National Accounts: Main Aggregates. Paris: OECD, various issues.
Prescott, E. C. (2002). “Prosperity and Depression.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 92, 1–15.
Taylor, J. B. (1993). “Discretion Versus Policy in Practice.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39, 195–214.
Woodland, A. D. (1982). International Trade and Resource Allocation. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kohli, U. An Implicit Törnqvist Index of Real GDP. Journal of Productivity Analysis 21, 337–353 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PROD.0000022097.34038.ad
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PROD.0000022097.34038.ad