Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of Technical Inefficiencies with Heterogeneous Technologies

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers the measurement of firm's specific (in)efficiency while allows for the possible heterogeneous technologies adopted by different firms. A flexible stochastic frontier model with random coefficients is proposed to distinguish technical inefficiency from technological differences across firms. Posterior inference of the model is made possible via the simulation-based approach, namely, Markov chain Monte Carlo method. The model is applied to a real data set which has also been considered in Christensen and Greene (1976), Greene (1990), Tsionas (2002), among others. Empirical results show that the regression coefficients can vary across firms, indicating the adoption of heterogeneous technologies by different firms. More importantly, we find that, without considering this possible heterogeneity, the inefficiency of firms can be over-estimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner, D., C. A. K. Lovell and P. Schmidt. (1977). “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models.” Journal of Econometrics 6, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chib, S. (1995). “Marginal Likelihood from the Gibbs Output.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 90, 1313–1321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chib, S. and E. Greenberg. (1995). “Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm.” American Statistician 49, 327–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chib, S. and I. Jeliazkov. (2001). “Marginal Likelihood from the Metropolis-Hastings Output.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 96, 270–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. and W. Greene. (1976). “Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation.” Journal of Political Economy 84, 655–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, C., G. Koop and M. Steel. (2002). “Multiple-Output Production with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to Nitrogen Surplus in Agriculture.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 97, 432–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, C., G. Koop and M. Steel. (2000). “A Bayesian Analysis of Multiple-Output Production Frontiers.” Journal of Econometrics 98, 47–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, C., J. Osiewalski and M. F. J. Steel. (1997). “On the Use of Panel Data in Stochastic Frontier Models with Improper Priors.” Journal of Econometrics 79, 169–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. E. and A. F. M. Smith. (1990). “Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 85, 398–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman and Geman. (1984). “Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions and the Bayesian Restoration of Images.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 6, 721–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (2003). “Simulated Likelihood Estimation of the Normal-Gamma Stochastic Frontier Function.” in Journal of Productivity Analysis 19, 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (1990). “A Gamma-Distributed Stochastic Frontier Model.” Journal of Econometrics 46, 141–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalirajan, K. P. and M. B. Obwona. (1994). “Frontier Production Function: The Stochastic Coefficients Approach.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 56, 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. and P. Schmidt. (2000). “A Review and Empirical Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Approaches to Inference on Efficiency Levels in Stochastic Frontier Models with Panel Data.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 14, 91–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop, G., J. Osiewalski and M. F. J. Steel. (1997). “Bayesian Efficiency Analysis Through Individual Effects: Hospital Cost Frontiers.” Journal of Econometrics 76, 77–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop, G., J. Osiewalski and M. F. J. Steel. (1994). “Bayesian Efficiency Analysis with a Flexible Form: The AIM Cost Function.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 12, 339–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop, G. and M. F. J. Steel. (2001). Bayesian Analysis of Stochastic Frontier Models. Chapter 24 in B. Baltagi (ed.), A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics. Oxford: Blackwell, 520–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop, G., M. F. J. Steel and J. Osiewalski. (1995). “Posterior Analysis of Stochastic Frontier Models Using Gibbs Sampling.” Computational Statistics 10, 353–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen, W. and J. van den Broeck. (1977). “Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Productions with Composed Errors.” International Economic Review 8, 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, C. and L. Simar. (1997). “Pitfalls of Normal-Gamma Stochastic Frontiers and Panel Data.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 8, 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsionas, E. G. (2002). “Stochastic Frontier Models with Random Coefficients.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 17, 127–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsionas, E. G. (2000). “Full Likelihood Inference in Normal-Gamma Stochastic Frontier Models.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 13, 183–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Broeck, J., G. Koop, J. Osiewalski and M. F. J. Steel. (1994). “Stochastic Frontier Models: A Bayesian Perspective.” Journal of Econometrics 61, 273–303.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, Hc.(. Estimation of Technical Inefficiencies with Heterogeneous Technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis 21, 277–296 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PROD.0000022094.39915.cf

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PROD.0000022094.39915.cf

Navigation