Prevention Science

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 207–212

Long-Term Follow-Up Effects of a School-Based Drug Abuse Prevention Program on Adolescent Risky Driving

  • Kenneth W. Griffin
  • Gilbert J. Botvin
  • Tracy R. Nichols


This study examined long-term follow-up data from a large-scale randomized trial to determine the extent to which participation in a school-based drug abuse prevention program during junior high school led to less risky driving among high school students. Self-report data collected from students in the 7th, 10th, and 12th grades were matched by name to students' department of motor vehicles (DMV) records at the end of high school. The DMV data included the total number of violations on students' driving records as well as the number of “points” that indicate the frequency and severity of the violations. A series of logistic regression analyses revealed that males were more likely to have violations and points on their driving records than females, and regular alcohol users were more likely to have violations and points than those who did not use alcohol regularly. Controlling for gender and alcohol use, students who received the drug prevention program during junior high school were less likely to have violations and points on their driving records relative to control group participants that did not receive the prevention program. Findings indicated that antidrinking attitudes mediated the effect of the intervention on driving violations, but not points. These results support the hypothesis that the behavioral effects of competence-enhancement prevention programs can extend to risk behaviors beyond the initial focus of intervention, such as risky driving.

adolescence drug abuse prevention risky driving 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnett, J. (1992). Reckless behavior in adolescence: A developmental perspective. Developmental Review, 12 ,339–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 ,1173–1182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumrind, D. (1987). A developmental perspective on adolescent risk taking in contemporary America.NewDirections for Child Development, 37 ,93–125.Google Scholar
  4. Botvin, G. J. (2000). Preventing drug abuse in schools: Social and competence enhancement approaches targeting individuallevel etiological factors. Addictive Behaviors, 25 ,887–897.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Botvin, G. J., Baker, E., Dusenbury, L. D., Botvin, E. M., & Diaz, T. (1995). Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a White middle-class population. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273 ,1106–1112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Botvin, G. J., Griffin, K. W., Diaz, T., & Ifill-Williams, M. (2001a). Drug abuse prevention among minority adolescents: One-year follow-up of a school-based preventive intervention. Prevention Science, 2 ,1–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Botvin, G. J., Griffin, K. W., Diaz, T., & Ifill-Williams, M. (2001b). Preventing binge drinking during early adolescence: One-and two-year follow-up of a school-based preventive intervention. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15 ,360–365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Botvin, G. J., Schinke, S. P., Epstein, J. A., & Diaz, T. (1994). Effectiveness of culturally-focused and generic skills training approaches to alcohol and drug abuse prevention among minority youths. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 8 ,116–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Donovan, J. E., Jessor, R., & Costa, E. M. (1988). Syndrome of problem behavior in adolescence: A replication. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56 ,762–765.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Harre, N. (2002). Risk evaluation, driving, and adolescents: A typology. Developmental Review, 20 ,206–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. (2002). Fatality facts: Teenagers. Accessed on November 12, 2003, from facts/fatality facts/teens.htm.Google Scholar
  12. Jessor, R., (1987). Risky driving and adolescent problem behavior: An extension of problem behavior theory. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, 3 ,1–11.Google Scholar
  13. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Norton, E. C., Bieler, G. S., Ennett, S. T., & Zarkin, G. A. (1996). Analysis of prevention program effectiveness with clustered data using generalized estimating equations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64 ,919–926.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tonkin, R. S., Cox, D. N., Blackman, A. R., & Sheps, S. (1990). Risk-taking behavior in adolescence. In R. J. McMahon, & R. D. Peters ( Eds.), Behavior disorders of adolescence: Research, intervention, and policy in clinical and school settings, (pp. 27–37). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  16. Vernick, J. S., Li, G., Ogaitis, S., MacKenzie, E. J., Baker, S. P., & Gielen, A. C. (1999). Effects of high school driver education on motor vehicle crashes, violations, and licensure. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 16(1S), 40–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Vingilis, E., & Adlaf, E. (1990). The structure of problem behaviour among Ontario high school students: A confirmatory-factor analysis. Health Education Research, 5 ,151–160.Google Scholar
  18. Young, C. (1991). Alcohol, Drugs, Driving and You:Acomprehensive program to prevent adolescent drinking, drug use, and driving. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 36 ,20–25.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth W. Griffin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gilbert J. Botvin
    • 1
  • Tracy R. Nichols
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Prevention Research, Weill Medical CollegeCornell UniversityNew York
  2. 2.National Health Promotion Associates (NHPA);USA

Personalised recommendations