A conceptual analysis of the transportation impacts of B2C e-commerce

Abstract

This paper discusses, at a conceptual level, a number of issues related to the evaluation of the transportation and spatial impacts of e-shopping. We review the comparative advantages of store shopping and e-shopping, and conclude that neither type uniformly dominates the other. We identify the building blocks of the shopping process, and note that information and communications technologies are making possible the spatial and temporal fragmentation and recombination of those elements. We analyze future shopping-related changes in transportation as the net outcome of four different fundamental causes, that can be viewed hierarchically: (1) changes in shopping mode share (i.e. shifts in the proportion of shopping activities conducted through store shopping, e-shopping and other modes), keeping the volume of goods purchased and per capita consumption spending constant; (2) changes in the volume of goods purchased, keeping per capita consumption spending constant; (3) changes in per capita consumption spending, independent of demographic changes; and (4) demographic changes. Some factors result in reduced travel while others lead to increased travel. The combined outcome of all factors does not appear to support any hope that e-shopping will reduce travel on net; to the contrary there may be negative impacts due to increased travel, even if those impacts are likely to be localized and/or small in magnitude for the most part. Thus, on the whole, we are likely (with some exceptions) to see continued adoption of both store shopping and e-shopping. Consumers will blend both forms as they conduct a sequence of shopping activities, and retailers will blend both in marketing to and serving customers. Assessing the transportation impacts of e-shopping – even in the short term, let alone the long term – presents some formidable measurement challenges. Nevertheless, those challenges are worthy of our most creative efforts at solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aoyama Y (2001) Structural foundations for e-commerce adoption: A comparative organization of retail trade between Japan and the United States. Urban Geography 22(2): 130-153.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Axhausen K (1995) Travel diary content: A brief review of its development. Presented at the 74th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, January.

  3. Axhausen K (1996) The design of environmentally aware travel diaries. Transportation Planning and Technology 19(3/4).

  4. Bernardini Od & Galli R (1993) Dematerialization: Long-term trends in the intensity of use of materials and energy. Futures (May): 431-448.

  5. Brynjolfsson E & Smith MD (2000) Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Management Science 46(4) (April): 563-585. Available at ebusiness.mit.edu/papers/friction.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brynjolfsson E & Smith MD (2001) The great equalizer? Consumer choice behavior at Internet shopbots. Working paper, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, April. Available at ebusiness.mit.edu/papers/tge.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burke RR (1997) Do you see what I see? The future of virtual shopping. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25(4): 352-360.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burke RR (1998) Real shopping in a virtual store. In: Bradley SP & Nolan RL (eds) Sense and Respond: Capturing Value in the Network Era. Boston: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Business Week (1998) Amazon.com: The wild world of e-commerce. December 14, p. 110.

  10. Cairns S (1996) Delivering alternatives: Successes and failures of home delivery services for food shopping. Transport Policy 3(4): 155-176.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Casas J, Zmud J, & Bricka S (2001) Impact of shopping via Internet on travel for shopping purposes. Paper no. 01–3393 presented at the 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January.

  12. Chung CJ, ed. (2002) The Harvard Design School Guide to Shopping. Cologne, Germany: Taschen.

  13. Cohen N (2002) E-commerce and the environment. In: Pamlin D (ed) Sustainability at the Speed of Light: Opportunities and Challenges for Tomorrow's Society. World Wildlife Fund Sweden. Available at www.panda.org/resources/publications/ict.cfm, accessed August 27, 2002.

  14. Couclelis H (2000) From sustainable transportation to sustainable accessibility: Can we avoid a new “tragedy of the commons”? In: Janelle DG & Hodge DC (eds) Information, Place, and Cyberspace: Issues in Accessibility. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Couclelis H (2001) Pizza over the Internet: E-commerce, the fragmentation of activity, and the tyranny of the region. Paper presented at the Workshop on Entrepreneurship, ICT and the Region, Amsterdam, June 7–8.

  16. Doherty ST, Noel N, Lee-Gosselin M, Sirois C, Ueno M & Theberge F (1999) Moving beyond observed outcomes: Integrating Global Positioning Systems and interactive computer-based travel behavior surveys. In: Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board Conference on Personal Travel: The Long and the Short of it. Washington DC, July. Available at trb.org/trb/publications/ec026/ec026.pdf.

  17. Draijer G, Kalfs N & Perdok J (2000) Global Positioning System as data collection method for travel research. Transportation Research Record 1719: 147-153.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Eastin MS (2002) Diffusion of e-commerce: An analysis of the adoption of four e-commerce activities. Telematics and Informatics 19: 251-267.

    Google Scholar 

  19. The Economist (2001) What do consumers want from the mobile Internet? October 11 print edition. www.economist.com, accessed October 18, 2001.

  20. European Commission (2001) The E-Economy in Europe: Its Potential Impact on EU Enterprises and Policies. Report of the e-economy conference, Brussels, March 1-2, 2001. Available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/events/e-economy/doc/e_economy_report.pdf (accessed August 31, 2001).

  21. Fiksel J (1996) Design for Environment: Creating Eco-Efficient Products and Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gould J (1998) Driven to shop? Role of transportation in future home shopping. Transportation Research Record 1617: 149-156.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gould J & Golob TF (1997) Shopping without travel or travel without shopping? An investigation of electronic home shopping. Transport Reviews 17(4): 355-376.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gould J & Golob TF (1998) Will electronic home shopping reduce travel? Access (the magazine of the University of California Transportation Center) 12 (Spring): 26-31.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gould J, Golob T, & Barwise P (1998) Why do people drive to shop? Future travel and telecommunication trade-offs. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January.

  26. summary.html, accessed September 14, 2001. mgreele@Ford.com (E-commerce Strategy Manager, Material Planning and Logistics, for the Ford Motor Company).

  27. Handy S & Yantis T (1997) The Impacts of Telecommunications Technologies on Nonwork Travel Behavior. Research Report SWUTC/97/721927-1F, Southwest Region University Transportation Center, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, January.

  28. Hof RD, Green H, & Himelstein L (1998) Special report: Now it's your Web. Business Week (October 5): 164-178.

  29. Hu PS & Young JR (1999) Summary of Travel Trends: 1995 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, December.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jarvenpaa SL, Tractinsky N & Vitale M (2000) Consumer trust in an Internet store. Information Technology and Management 1(1/2): 45-71.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jou R-C & Mahmassani HS (1997) Comparative analysis of day-to-day trip-chaining behavior of urban commuters in two cities. Transportation Research Record 1607: 163-170.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jupiter Communications (1999) Internet shopping is substituting for traditional buying. Press release, www.jup.com.

  33. Kärnä A (2001) Dematerialization potential of electronic grocery shopping. In: Heiskanen E, Halme M, Jalas M, Kärnä A, & Lovio R (eds) Dematerialization: The Potential of ICT and Services. Prepared by Helsinki School of Economics, Department of Management, for The Finnish Environment publication series, The Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland. http://hkkk.fi/organisaatiot/research/programs/dema/dema.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gard DL & Keoleian GA (2003) Digital versus print: Energy performance in the selection and use of scholarly journals. Journal of Industrial Ecology 6(2): 115-132. Available on the Internet at http://mitpress.mit.edu/jie/e-commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kaufman L (1995) That's entertainment: Shopping malls are borrowing ideas from theme parks to survive. Newsweek (September 11): 72.

  36. Keskinen A, Delache X, Cruddas J, Lindjord JE & Iglesias C (2001) A Purchase and a Chain: Impacts of E-Commerce on Transport and the Environment. Report of Working Group 3 to the European Commission Joint Expert Group on Transport and the Environment, November 15. Available on the Internet at europa.eu.int/comm/environment/trans/revisedreportwg3.pdf, accessed May 5, 2003.

  37. Kitou EA, Horvath A & Masanet E (2001) Web-based tool for estimating the environmental impacts of telework. Paper presented at the IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Denver, Colorado, May 7-9. The web-based tool is available at greenmfg.me.berkeley.edu/green/SoftwareTools/Telework/.

  38. Koppelman F, Salomon I & Proussaloglou K (1991) Teleshopping or store shopping? A choice model for forecasting the use of new telecommunications-based services. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 18: 473-489.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lal R & Sarvary M (1999) When and how is the Internet likely to decrease price competition? Marketing Science 18(4): 485-503.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lin II & Mahmassani HS (2002) Can online grocers deliver? Some logistics considerations. Transportation Research Record 1817: 17-24.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lin II, Mahmassani HS, Jaillet P & Walton CM (2002) Electronic marketplaces for transportation services: Shipper considerations. Transportation Research Record 1790.

  42. Manski CF & Salomon I (1987) The demand for teleshopping: An application of discrete choice models. Regional Science and Urban Economics 17: 109-121.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Marker JT & Goulias K (2000) Framework for the analysis of grocery teleshopping. Transportation Research Record 1725: 1-8.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Matthews HS, Hendrickson CT & Soh DL (2001) Environmental and economic effects of e-commerce: A case study of book publishing and retail logistics. Transportation Research Record 1763: 6-19.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mokhtarian PL (2000) Telecommunications and travel. Millennium white paper prepared for the Transportation Research Board. Available on the Web at www.nationalacademies.org/trb/publications/millennium/00115.pdf.

  46. Mokhtarian PL (2003) Telecommunications and travel: The case for complementarity. Journal of Industrial Ecology 6(2): 43-57. Available on the Internet at http://mitpress.mit.edu/jie/e-commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mokhtarian PL & Meenakshisundaram R (1999) Beyond tele-substitution: Disaggregate longitudinal structural equations modeling of communications impacts. Transportation Research C 7(1): 33-52.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mokhtarian PL & Salomon I (2002) Emerging travel patterns: Do telecommunications make a difference? Invited resource paper for the 8th meeting of the International Association for Travel Behaviour Research, Austin, TX, September 21–25, 1997. In: Mahmassani HS (ed) In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behaviour Research Opportunities and Application Challenges. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press/Elsevier, pp. 143-182.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mokhtarian PL & Salomon I (2001) How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transportation Research A 35(8), 695-719.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mount I (2000) Just don't spill that latte on my copy of “Sleepless in Seattle”. SmartMoney, February 14. See www.smartmoney.com/smt/markets/news.

  51. Murtishaw S & Schipper L (2001) Disaggregated analysis of US energy consumption in the 1990s: Evidence of the effects of the Internet and rapid economic growth. Energy Policy 29: 1335-1356.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Nagurney A, Dong J & Mokhtarian PL (2002) Multicriteria network equilibrium modeling with variable weights for decision-making in the Information Age with applications to telecommuting and teleshopping. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 26: 1629-1650.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Neuborne E & Hof RD (1998) Branding on the Net. Business Week (November 9): 76-86.

  54. Niles JS (1994) Beyond Telecommuting: A New Paradigm for the Effect of Telecommunications on Travel. Report DOE/ER-0626, prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research and Office of Scientific Computing. Available from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161, phone (703) 487–4650, www.ntis.gov. Also available at www.lbl.gov/ICSD/Niles/.

  55. Palmer JW (2000) Electronic commerce in retailing: Convenience, search costs, delivery and price across retail formats. Information Technology and Management 1(1/2): 25-43.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Peterson RA, Balasubramanian S & Bronnenberg BJ (1997) Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25(4) (Fall): 329-346.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rabah MY & Mahmassani HS (2001) Impact of Electronic Commerce on Logistics Operations: A Focus on VMI Strategy. Report No. SWUTC/01/167227, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas, Austin, August. Available through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161, phone (703) 487-4650, www.ntis.gov.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Salomon I & Koppelman FS (1988) A framework for studying teleshopping versus store shopping. Transportation Research A 22(4): 247-255.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Salomon I & Koppelman FS (1992) Teleshopping or going shopping? An information acquisition perspective. Behaviour and Information Technology 11(4): 189-198.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Salon D, Sperling D, Shaheen S, & Sturges D (1999) New Mobility: Using Technology and Partnerships to Create More Sustainable Transportation. Research Report No. UCD-ITS-RR-99-1, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Schiffman LG & Kanuk LL (1987) Consumer Behavior, 3rd edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Siikavirta H, Punakivi M, Kärkkäinen M & Linnanen L (2003) Effects of e-commerce on greenhouse gas emissions: A case study of grocery home delivery in Finland. Journal of Industrial Ecology 6(2): 83-97. Available on the Internet at http://mitpress.mit.edu/jie/e-commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Steinfield CW & Whitten P (1999) Community level socio-economic impacts of electronic commerce. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 5(2). www.acusc.org/jcmc/

  64. Tacken M (1990) Effects of teleshopping on the use of time and space. Transportation Research Record 1285: 89-91.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Tanaka J, Springen K & Koshner K (1998) From soup to nuts: Shop for groceries without leaving the den. Newsweek (March 16): 77-79.

  66. Tauber E (1972) Why do people shop? Journal of Marketing 36: 46-49.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Underhill P (2000) Why We Buy: The Science of Shopping. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Vala-Haynes P (2000) What does online shopping cost us? Newsweek (June 12): 10.

  69. Williams E & Tagami T (2003) Energy use in sales and distribution via e-commerce and conventional retail: A case study of the Japanese book sector. Journal of Industrial Ecology 6(2): 99-114. Available on the Internet at http://mitpress.mit.edu/jie/e-commerce.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mokhtarian, P.L. A conceptual analysis of the transportation impacts of B2C e-commerce. Transportation 31, 257–284 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PORT.0000025428.64128.d3

Download citation

  • business-to-consumer e-commerce
  • e-commerce
  • shopping behavior
  • teleshopping
  • transportation impacts of ICT