, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 257–284 | Cite as

A conceptual analysis of the transportation impacts of B2C e-commerce

  • Patricia L. Mokhtarian


This paper discusses, at a conceptual level, a number of issues related to the evaluation of the transportation and spatial impacts of e-shopping. We review the comparative advantages of store shopping and e-shopping, and conclude that neither type uniformly dominates the other. We identify the building blocks of the shopping process, and note that information and communications technologies are making possible the spatial and temporal fragmentation and recombination of those elements. We analyze future shopping-related changes in transportation as the net outcome of four different fundamental causes, that can be viewed hierarchically: (1) changes in shopping mode share (i.e. shifts in the proportion of shopping activities conducted through store shopping, e-shopping and other modes), keeping the volume of goods purchased and per capita consumption spending constant; (2) changes in the volume of goods purchased, keeping per capita consumption spending constant; (3) changes in per capita consumption spending, independent of demographic changes; and (4) demographic changes. Some factors result in reduced travel while others lead to increased travel. The combined outcome of all factors does not appear to support any hope that e-shopping will reduce travel on net; to the contrary there may be negative impacts due to increased travel, even if those impacts are likely to be localized and/or small in magnitude for the most part. Thus, on the whole, we are likely (with some exceptions) to see continued adoption of both store shopping and e-shopping. Consumers will blend both forms as they conduct a sequence of shopping activities, and retailers will blend both in marketing to and serving customers. Assessing the transportation impacts of e-shopping – even in the short term, let alone the long term – presents some formidable measurement challenges. Nevertheless, those challenges are worthy of our most creative efforts at solution.

business-to-consumer e-commerce e-commerce shopping behavior teleshopping transportation impacts of ICT 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aoyama Y (2001) Structural foundations for e-commerce adoption: A comparative organization of retail trade between Japan and the United States. Urban Geography 22(2): 130-153.Google Scholar
  2. Axhausen K (1995) Travel diary content: A brief review of its development. Presented at the 74th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, January.Google Scholar
  3. Axhausen K (1996) The design of environmentally aware travel diaries. Transportation Planning and Technology 19(3/4).Google Scholar
  4. Bernardini Od & Galli R (1993) Dematerialization: Long-term trends in the intensity of use of materials and energy. Futures (May): 431-448.Google Scholar
  5. Brynjolfsson E & Smith MD (2000) Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Management Science 46(4) (April): 563-585. Available at Scholar
  6. Brynjolfsson E & Smith MD (2001) The great equalizer? Consumer choice behavior at Internet shopbots. Working paper, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, April. Available at Scholar
  7. Burke RR (1997) Do you see what I see? The future of virtual shopping. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25(4): 352-360.Google Scholar
  8. Burke RR (1998) Real shopping in a virtual store. In: Bradley SP & Nolan RL (eds) Sense and Respond: Capturing Value in the Network Era. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  9. Business Week (1998) The wild world of e-commerce. December 14, p. 110.Google Scholar
  10. Cairns S (1996) Delivering alternatives: Successes and failures of home delivery services for food shopping. Transport Policy 3(4): 155-176.Google Scholar
  11. Casas J, Zmud J, & Bricka S (2001) Impact of shopping via Internet on travel for shopping purposes. Paper no. 01–3393 presented at the 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January.Google Scholar
  12. Chung CJ, ed. (2002) The Harvard Design School Guide to Shopping. Cologne, Germany: Taschen.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen N (2002) E-commerce and the environment. In: Pamlin D (ed) Sustainability at the Speed of Light: Opportunities and Challenges for Tomorrow's Society. World Wildlife Fund Sweden. Available at, accessed August 27, 2002.Google Scholar
  14. Couclelis H (2000) From sustainable transportation to sustainable accessibility: Can we avoid a new “tragedy of the commons”? In: Janelle DG & Hodge DC (eds) Information, Place, and Cyberspace: Issues in Accessibility. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Couclelis H (2001) Pizza over the Internet: E-commerce, the fragmentation of activity, and the tyranny of the region. Paper presented at the Workshop on Entrepreneurship, ICT and the Region, Amsterdam, June 7–8.Google Scholar
  16. Doherty ST, Noel N, Lee-Gosselin M, Sirois C, Ueno M & Theberge F (1999) Moving beyond observed outcomes: Integrating Global Positioning Systems and interactive computer-based travel behavior surveys. In: Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board Conference on Personal Travel: The Long and the Short of it. Washington DC, July. Available at Scholar
  17. Draijer G, Kalfs N & Perdok J (2000) Global Positioning System as data collection method for travel research. Transportation Research Record 1719: 147-153.Google Scholar
  18. Eastin MS (2002) Diffusion of e-commerce: An analysis of the adoption of four e-commerce activities. Telematics and Informatics 19: 251-267.Google Scholar
  19. The Economist (2001) What do consumers want from the mobile Internet? October 11 print edition., accessed October 18, 2001.Google Scholar
  20. European Commission (2001) The E-Economy in Europe: Its Potential Impact on EU Enterprises and Policies. Report of the e-economy conference, Brussels, March 1-2, 2001. Available at (accessed August 31, 2001).Google Scholar
  21. Fiksel J (1996) Design for Environment: Creating Eco-Efficient Products and Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Gould J (1998) Driven to shop? Role of transportation in future home shopping. Transportation Research Record 1617: 149-156.Google Scholar
  23. Gould J & Golob TF (1997) Shopping without travel or travel without shopping? An investigation of electronic home shopping. Transport Reviews 17(4): 355-376.Google Scholar
  24. Gould J & Golob TF (1998) Will electronic home shopping reduce travel? Access (the magazine of the University of California Transportation Center) 12 (Spring): 26-31.Google Scholar
  25. Gould J, Golob T, & Barwise P (1998) Why do people drive to shop? Future travel and telecommunication trade-offs. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January.Google Scholar
  26. summary.html, accessed September 14, 2001. (E-commerce Strategy Manager, Material Planning and Logistics, for the Ford Motor Company).Google Scholar
  27. Handy S & Yantis T (1997) The Impacts of Telecommunications Technologies on Nonwork Travel Behavior. Research Report SWUTC/97/721927-1F, Southwest Region University Transportation Center, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, January.Google Scholar
  28. Hof RD, Green H, & Himelstein L (1998) Special report: Now it's your Web. Business Week (October 5): 164-178.Google Scholar
  29. Hu PS & Young JR (1999) Summary of Travel Trends: 1995 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, December.Google Scholar
  30. Jarvenpaa SL, Tractinsky N & Vitale M (2000) Consumer trust in an Internet store. Information Technology and Management 1(1/2): 45-71.Google Scholar
  31. Jou R-C & Mahmassani HS (1997) Comparative analysis of day-to-day trip-chaining behavior of urban commuters in two cities. Transportation Research Record 1607: 163-170.Google Scholar
  32. Jupiter Communications (1999) Internet shopping is substituting for traditional buying. Press release, Scholar
  33. Kärnä A (2001) Dematerialization potential of electronic grocery shopping. In: Heiskanen E, Halme M, Jalas M, Kärnä A, & Lovio R (eds) Dematerialization: The Potential of ICT and Services. Prepared by Helsinki School of Economics, Department of Management, for The Finnish Environment publication series, The Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland. Scholar
  34. Gard DL & Keoleian GA (2003) Digital versus print: Energy performance in the selection and use of scholarly journals. Journal of Industrial Ecology 6(2): 115-132. Available on the Internet at Scholar
  35. Kaufman L (1995) That's entertainment: Shopping malls are borrowing ideas from theme parks to survive. Newsweek (September 11): 72.Google Scholar
  36. Keskinen A, Delache X, Cruddas J, Lindjord JE & Iglesias C (2001) A Purchase and a Chain: Impacts of E-Commerce on Transport and the Environment. Report of Working Group 3 to the European Commission Joint Expert Group on Transport and the Environment, November 15. Available on the Internet at, accessed May 5, 2003.Google Scholar
  37. Kitou EA, Horvath A & Masanet E (2001) Web-based tool for estimating the environmental impacts of telework. Paper presented at the IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Denver, Colorado, May 7-9. The web-based tool is available at Scholar
  38. Koppelman F, Salomon I & Proussaloglou K (1991) Teleshopping or store shopping? A choice model for forecasting the use of new telecommunications-based services. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 18: 473-489.Google Scholar
  39. Lal R & Sarvary M (1999) When and how is the Internet likely to decrease price competition? Marketing Science 18(4): 485-503.Google Scholar
  40. Lin II & Mahmassani HS (2002) Can online grocers deliver? Some logistics considerations. Transportation Research Record 1817: 17-24.Google Scholar
  41. Lin II, Mahmassani HS, Jaillet P & Walton CM (2002) Electronic marketplaces for transportation services: Shipper considerations. Transportation Research Record 1790.Google Scholar
  42. Manski CF & Salomon I (1987) The demand for teleshopping: An application of discrete choice models. Regional Science and Urban Economics 17: 109-121.Google Scholar
  43. Marker JT & Goulias K (2000) Framework for the analysis of grocery teleshopping. Transportation Research Record 1725: 1-8.Google Scholar
  44. Matthews HS, Hendrickson CT & Soh DL (2001) Environmental and economic effects of e-commerce: A case study of book publishing and retail logistics. Transportation Research Record 1763: 6-19.Google Scholar
  45. Mokhtarian PL (2000) Telecommunications and travel. Millennium white paper prepared for the Transportation Research Board. Available on the Web at Scholar
  46. Mokhtarian PL (2003) Telecommunications and travel: The case for complementarity. Journal of Industrial Ecology 6(2): 43-57. Available on the Internet at Scholar
  47. Mokhtarian PL & Meenakshisundaram R (1999) Beyond tele-substitution: Disaggregate longitudinal structural equations modeling of communications impacts. Transportation Research C 7(1): 33-52.Google Scholar
  48. Mokhtarian PL & Salomon I (2002) Emerging travel patterns: Do telecommunications make a difference? Invited resource paper for the 8th meeting of the International Association for Travel Behaviour Research, Austin, TX, September 21–25, 1997. In: Mahmassani HS (ed) In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behaviour Research Opportunities and Application Challenges. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press/Elsevier, pp. 143-182.Google Scholar
  49. Mokhtarian PL & Salomon I (2001) How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transportation Research A 35(8), 695-719.Google Scholar
  50. Mount I (2000) Just don't spill that latte on my copy of “Sleepless in Seattle”. SmartMoney, February 14. See Scholar
  51. Murtishaw S & Schipper L (2001) Disaggregated analysis of US energy consumption in the 1990s: Evidence of the effects of the Internet and rapid economic growth. Energy Policy 29: 1335-1356.Google Scholar
  52. Nagurney A, Dong J & Mokhtarian PL (2002) Multicriteria network equilibrium modeling with variable weights for decision-making in the Information Age with applications to telecommuting and teleshopping. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 26: 1629-1650.Google Scholar
  53. Neuborne E & Hof RD (1998) Branding on the Net. Business Week (November 9): 76-86.Google Scholar
  54. Niles JS (1994) Beyond Telecommuting: A New Paradigm for the Effect of Telecommunications on Travel. Report DOE/ER-0626, prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research and Office of Scientific Computing. Available from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161, phone (703) 487–4650, Also available at Scholar
  55. Palmer JW (2000) Electronic commerce in retailing: Convenience, search costs, delivery and price across retail formats. Information Technology and Management 1(1/2): 25-43.Google Scholar
  56. Peterson RA, Balasubramanian S & Bronnenberg BJ (1997) Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25(4) (Fall): 329-346.Google Scholar
  57. Rabah MY & Mahmassani HS (2001) Impact of Electronic Commerce on Logistics Operations: A Focus on VMI Strategy. Report No. SWUTC/01/167227, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas, Austin, August. Available through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161, phone (703) 487-4650, Scholar
  58. Salomon I & Koppelman FS (1988) A framework for studying teleshopping versus store shopping. Transportation Research A 22(4): 247-255.Google Scholar
  59. Salomon I & Koppelman FS (1992) Teleshopping or going shopping? An information acquisition perspective. Behaviour and Information Technology 11(4): 189-198.Google Scholar
  60. Salon D, Sperling D, Shaheen S, & Sturges D (1999) New Mobility: Using Technology and Partnerships to Create More Sustainable Transportation. Research Report No. UCD-ITS-RR-99-1, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
  61. Schiffman LG & Kanuk LL (1987) Consumer Behavior, 3rd edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  62. Siikavirta H, Punakivi M, Kärkkäinen M & Linnanen L (2003) Effects of e-commerce on greenhouse gas emissions: A case study of grocery home delivery in Finland. Journal of Industrial Ecology 6(2): 83-97. Available on the Internet at Scholar
  63. Steinfield CW & Whitten P (1999) Community level socio-economic impacts of electronic commerce. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 5(2). Scholar
  64. Tacken M (1990) Effects of teleshopping on the use of time and space. Transportation Research Record 1285: 89-91.Google Scholar
  65. Tanaka J, Springen K & Koshner K (1998) From soup to nuts: Shop for groceries without leaving the den. Newsweek (March 16): 77-79.Google Scholar
  66. Tauber E (1972) Why do people shop? Journal of Marketing 36: 46-49.Google Scholar
  67. Underhill P (2000) Why We Buy: The Science of Shopping. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  68. Vala-Haynes P (2000) What does online shopping cost us? Newsweek (June 12): 10.Google Scholar
  69. Williams E & Tagami T (2003) Energy use in sales and distribution via e-commerce and conventional retail: A case study of the Japanese book sector. Journal of Industrial Ecology 6(2): 99-114. Available on the Internet at Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia L. Mokhtarian
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Institute of Transportation StudiesUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations